Imagine there are two people both handcuffed to different sides of the room and a key is left in the middle of the room further than either have potential to reach.
Negate May does not establish ideal value.
The words may and may not have a lot of range that might change value.
I don’t want to sound patronizing, thus example choice matters.
I may go to the store, I may not go 200 mph on the Highway.
World leaders may not go to war, may make peace – it is sounds good, but will they listen to me? Trying to say may not drop bombs on little girls (like Vietnam poster), may find ways for international trade that equates to people with cancer are saved.
God could tell people that are against me (and I don’t know who that would be) where there is gold located at the bottom of the ocean. God may factors into reduced losses for self and enemy protected greater, isn’t that part of Christianity? My enemies insufficiently invested in might be part of the problem and God has the gold reserves as a known? Extract resources turn up heat, not something worthy of pondering as a potential problem? God of pay half, increase pressure, pay fourth, increase pressure not really God of an overfilling cup.
Money and Gold does not establish value ideally is part of the problem. Price gets set to end of cost, buy software does not equate to bug free software, software who’s full implications are known, have capacity to be known. We rely upon throughput in the system does not always equate to we challenge values set and get in the system. YouTube is nice, but do we go to their facilities, get a PhD in Computer Science and examine every line of code? Reliance is a less than ideal system. Excuse me if this sounds rude, I am potentially speaking to the audience like I would to another Computer Scientist. I have been both a whistleblower and outed from the industry on far less than ideal comprehension and communications – so someone that is trying to add value, is disallowed, thrown in jail, expect ideal value established and delivered in Silicon Valley? Negate (thought about using Fee or Claim here) we rely is ideal know, ideal oh. Claim would have inspired more thought, fee it, charge it does not always establish ideal value, negate seems apt.
Figured I would attach some encouragement to this post
Free Starter Image (outside of sanctions countries)
People need to understand the problems that they face not fully graced? Negate may factors into grace, may factors into grace. Ideally graced would be ideal, claims of ideal would not be ideally graced. Things like grace and forgiveness are powerful systems, worthy of turning up in advance, will can be iffed through resource reduction is a problem worthy of turning down. Will set potentially not always get when people are tired, worn down. Artists required to tell both sides of the story is not always nice, spiced light – giving each other grace and forgiveness is possible, iffy close to the line art is not test free potentially not always ideally divested from. Imagine you are a professional sports player, and you just lose a game and then someone shows up and says I want you to meet my new supermodel girlfriend. Know set to may not always ideal ray.
Fee-d thin not always free from future mins. See loss see wins claim it ideals fins? Appearance of a Yacht does not equate to having a Yacht, weigh no camera in? We see sets to A’s mins is less than ideal comprehend.
My Tech Blog 