The words fee and claim have potential to be used interchangeably yet with vastly different meanings perceived and comprehended.
One might say if they don’t know something, fee I get it wrong. Another way of saying it would be if they don’t know something, claim I get it ideal?
I potentially use the two interchangeably without fully comprehending implications. If someone says Fee them if they get it wrong (at least when I am saying it), I am not saying charge $1000 for every mistake. I am saying weight the value as less desirable, less than ideal grounds have been established.
Might be wiser for me to say claim I get it right more often than fee if I get it wrong. Turning up sue, hold bar too high, accountability too high, increasing burdens might be amplified by reiterations of fee. Know A, Fee A does not equate to will know A, will show doesn’t know A, will not lead to Fee A. Required to know does not equate to know, required to know does not equate to won’t fee too high.
There is potential for growth and improvement in communications that could lead to vast improvement potentially not always pondered. Improvement to communications might not always be seen and known by self. Fee might sound smarter than the word claim, but is it?
Weighted might be wrong, there is a cost, versus weighted buyer beware? Fee might exude confidence, confidence where confidence is not always meant. Set to less-than-ideal grounds might equate to thought cost is unknown, less likely to be a cost. Comprehension is always less than 100%, ideal equates to costs and fees thought to be known might not be acknowledged.
Fee society always gets reduced oppression right, versus claim society always ideals reduced oppression? Which one is more likely to lead to reduced oppression? One calls people to fight oppression or factor it in, one calls people to factor it in, acknowledge it, or not. Different levels of freedom, different levels of momentum.
With communications there is likely safe ground to walk on and less safe ground to walk on, and one might not hear from a writer or speaker for a while after they fall on less safe ground. Compounded with World Events and Health Problems, know results of communications far from a guarantee. I want others to have positive results based upon reading my documents, not negative ones. Language is a less than ideal system that I wish would amplify more ideally for all in the world. Language is a for profit system, and there are some on streets and some with Yachts. Juxtaposition has potential to increase comprehension. Own fee see range?
Might be potential for a class on weighting words including words like these.
Fee society needs to replace falling electrical poles, or claim society ideals electrical poles? Which one is more likely to inspire change? Claim rays may. Claim I get ideal iffy ground right? Beats getting fee-d for it, fend understand why? Reminder I am not a lawyer.
Imagine there are two possible outcomes, two different arguments
Imagine you could see a visual representation, and one looks more attractive than the other
Imagine you are a numbers person, and you are given two numbers
1000 or 0
High Numbers better
Low Numbers better
Situational weighting
Imagine there is a choice politicians could make, and supercomputers could show the representation of the projected results as the combined images and personalities all persons represented by the change. Two people – reminder the results could be biased, could be misrepresented, yet supercomputers are relied upon for best guesses. Both could be homeless – if the choice is one that equates to a projected future with either outcome as homeless, maybe there is other more important data to be considering? Relevance limiting and less than ideal data are both scary, have potential for being factored in, less than ideally factored out. Weighed see ideals mins? A trip to the park I just made factors into inspiration for this paragraph. Weighed hear ideals mins, weighed read ideals mins?
The perfect piece of art could lead to someone staring endlessly into it for hours, the right music on repeat could lead to never changing the radio station, the perfect book could be read and re-read at the cost of listening to updates. Thus I think it wise to say in a system where stage time cannot be ideally identified, idealing mins is close to impossible. Golden Rule in The Bible says min nobody, ideal mins, treat everyone how you wish to be treated, all 8 billion plus? If someone is hugging someone else on the other side of the planet, they are adding valuable service, valuable service that is both less valuable to me and of great importance. Others winded should not be set to all reduced gift.
Video I took while on that trip to the park
My Tech Blog 