Criminal 1 Innocent
Criminal 2 Innocent
Criminal 3 Innocent
Criminal 1 Innocent
Criminal 2 Guilty
Criminal 3 Innocent
The change has potential to happen on a computer, does not require notification of Criminal 2. Imagine the same thing with groups of criminals, and potential for set based upon a particular profile. Of Type is not all ideal value added. Imagine a marketing company sets a customer from heterosexual to homosexual add preference. Now Imagine that is someone’s daughter that just turned 18.
Our system as of late has been far from sufficient oppression out, combined with that knowledge the potential combination could be dangerous on a not fully appreciated level.
I like computers, I invest in computers, I don’t want to invest in the misery of others, yet the 3 seem to be intertwined more than I would like.
Representation has potential to be changed, out from under people, without prior notice is a less than ideal system.
Let, met, set factors into get. A no min, A know min?
In fee-d min gets equated to acceptable, sufficient, desirable has potential for less-than-ideal comprehension. Without sin cast the first stone, that said everyone set to a homosexual distribution list could make a lot of people angry.
Kind of awful to think what is possible, and not always considered as possible until you are under the effects of oppression yourself. A few in society might be ramped to anger and less than ideal comprehension is scary.
People that think flipping others sexuality is possible, useful might factor into losses. Possible factors into useful, useful is not always ideal value established or delivered. Increasing potential to defend from attacks could equate to exponential divests, reduce comprehension, and potentially bigger problems. Add in A B Testing, and people don’t always get the same experience might create more than a little friction.
Imagine LGBT gets in charge of everything, and all news reporters are transgender. This could spark confusion and friction in society. This might appear weak to other powers on the world stage, that might challenge while in a position of friction.
Could be some very important points I am missing here, worthy of note Bible and Golden Rule Throughtput, Without Sin Cast first stone Lesson Throughput are both far less than ideal, factors into safety. A way owed thought does not equate to delivered, required to be delivered. Inned could be seen as owed does not require investment.
Society ifs people more than one would like by default, before oppression or actually someone, or some group trying to pursue flipping someone. Know society winds it, wind at tolerable levels might be different for different parties.
Tendency for A let, set to met, without A support set, met, get.
Know it, does not equate to owe it, show it – the combination might be LTI (less than ideal) for all parties. Potential for more adversely affecting those with less and health problems in society, including those in jails and prisons. Fee society and government is likely to min it, fend it. Reminder I am not a lawyer.
People think they know max wind, yet every year technology progresses, medicines available and factored into useful change. Forgivable, in by design weighed as not a problem.
Might be a bigger problem in some fields than others, might create uncomfortable work environments where people do not feel like they are able to speak up and address problems. Potential for society of see A wind as a known. Oppression changes things in far less than ideal ways.
All that said if I used all these words for encouragement instead of trying to increase wisdom on this subject, would it really be worse value? 10d may potentially not always ideal value established, 10 negate say potentially not ideal value either. Potential for up to debate, that said if-ed not all gift.
Political parties set homosexuality to NBD (no big deal), NMP (not my problem). The Bible says don’t judge. That said people have to assess what they consider acceptable for their family to be around or not around. NBD, NMP gets set to sufficient support, sufficient direction for the future. Can’t ideally min it combined with bigger problems on world stage like Iran investing in Nuclear weapons likely leads to NBD, NMP.
Doctors and Nurses set to no homosexuality allowed might lead to male doctors unable to treat men and women doctors unable to treat women. That said A-ing may might lead to dictators setting parts of society to can be re-educated to homosexuals. Less common factors into what society tolerates, mainstream might lead to problems. Less births equates to less practice for doctors, claim it all good, all should?
If a man sees a piece of metal and learns that it is High Voltage, yet there is no High Voltage sign attached to it, the man is making an assessment there is a problem, a problem that needs to be addressed, a problem that if not addressed could lead to death, or pain and suffering for others. Assess and fix has potential to be set to judge and sue.
Claim it does not may, may might not lead to failed expectations? Could be used as a weapon, could be used to de-pride, could be used to reduce credible. Reducing credible and pride might be seen as profitable, in a profit-based world, and profit does not always have the best interest of others at heart, add in potential for subconscious undercurrents determinism is less determined.
Our system turns it up, judgment is not fair, divests set to assessment and not judgment still have potential to lead to reduced support. Precision for some people’s brains might be different than others, hard to fully appreciate society and artists cut close to iffy line to help defend others, prove the points as valid, which has potential to be further turned up by supercomputers. Might be needed and desirable support for those this effects by default in both society and government, which mays, and may for a small subset might turn it up to a larger subset. Fought to greater extent might reduced safety for others does not equate to fought at greater extent is not desirable at times.
I see it has the potential to min does not equate to I know the full potential, when it is a problem, have capacity to address where it is a problem and when it is a problem – nondeterministic seems apt. I see the potential does not always equate to I know the problem, comprehend the problem sufficiently. I shouldn’t, don’t desire to judge does not equate to assessment and reduced potential for pain and problems isn’t desirable to turn up. LTISO divests from sin at times is a desirable outcome yet sin, what is sin is not always ideally agreed upon.
LTISO – less than ideal sin out
Own negate let is less than ideal responsibility at times. Owning negate let does not always equate to stopping from grounds of ideal sin out, yet more ideal sin out might have lessened problems in the first place. Society turns up clubs and beaches where women wear skimpy clothing then blame women for liking other women seems less than ideal. Hard to determine what sin is in this world, claim others, taught Not to Judge are given ideal grounds to make assessment?
Society has had gay for a long time, it has been less than all value added, and with innovation it is not fully deterministic how much, how many tests amplifications towards homosexuality will exist. People know supercomputers and medicine amplify gay, iffy at times yet we as society do not, choose not to divest. Preachers and Priests that don’t address root of problems might not always have ideal grounds to stand upon to set right and wrong around the subject.
Part of the problem – A know is A know, doesn’t have to listen because A know knows everything A know needs to know. This document is not written around A know, this document is written around some know, that might be de-valued by some that might desire power and profit, that might sell self as A know. The future gets set to zero potential is less than ideal.
Writing this document is jading, reading it is likely jading as well – yet jading is because thought of sufficient know, nice to be reminded that I am less than A know, the future has hope and potential. Man that likes bikinis wants to say tisk tisk don’t do that?
My Tech Blog 