Comments

Some of my comments have been made at times recovering from very hard times in my life. Trajectory of words and comments might likely be vastly different had I not experienced what I have. That said, some of my comments could have been orchestrated in both value-added ways and less than ideal value-added ways. Oppression set to ideal output seems unwise. To fully understand some of my past writings one might have to experience what I have, and I would not recommend that.

These are different times, I would likely say things differently knowing more now. Value added via increased communication and comprehension is not always easy and straightforward to apply to past comments. Original value delivered might have been less than ideal value established at times – relied a bit on God will give me the right words and the right times as a measure of faith not sure how to coincide that with the concept education and improved skills are both possible and useful. Also, reality man is LTISO and LTICN – less than ideal sin out and less than ideal comprehension in – equates to words might not always be perfected by God.

If God would always gives the right words, always will give the right words to coaches to help win the game, lawyers to win trials, politicians to win office? God plays sides, in a system of Golden Rule?

I feel less than always adequately equipped with the right words at the right times. Maybe more words, better words would have been more profitable for me and not others, potentially a compromise society is willing to make? Profit and Corporations, Golden Rule delivers LTI less than ideally, and fact better language and words matters.

Purpose of this document originally was to say problems in my life have factored into delivery of words in the past that have likely been less than ideal value at times for all parties – to what extent I need to apologize, I do not know, for the unknown aspect I am sorry.

More words is sometimes, not always the higher value-added system. Less words to read is not always more reading comprehension, reading comprehension that factors into capacity to read High Voltage signs. Words are non-null time costs, and when there is a lot going on in the world other directions for problem solving is sometimes high value added, might even prevent saying the wrong things, having to step back comments at times.

More words might equate to more tests at times. More tests are not always greater value added. Less tests are not always ideal grace established. More tests are not always ideal grace established. People set to know how much to test when to test is not always true value added, grace for the testers not always simple.

Part of the purpose of a blog is words, words that profit, words that communicate, words that profit both self and others, words that have the potential to teach, raise awareness, all in potentially LTI less than ideal ways, less than ideal profit for all parties. De-let if it doesn’t profit me seems unwise, words that someone else is speaking might lead to World Peace, save the world. De-let if it robs me is a bit more convoluted system, thinking about limited amount of stage time, popularity, and potential for robbing while still technically following the law – legal ground thought of as ideal value established and delivered does not equate to ideal value established and delivered at times.

Imagine someone is about to release a book, and supercomputers and AI are used based upon an early copy to make 5 books of similar topics, all to be released at the same time. Sufficiently different to follow the law might not equate to authors always valued. Authors squashed by more powerful systems, including realization that the government has early access and copies of work in advance doesn’t give feeling of all favorites out, ideal value established. Less fair playing field matters, factors into value, of what people will value in the future.

If I use descriptive writing about a mountain side, beautiful trees and an epic blue sky – a supercomputer can generate art based upon that description. Systems, including systems of words set to have to value all ideally in a profit-based system is not true, less valued is not always ideal value established. Paper and pencil vs word processing, spell correction? We invest in systems that have potential to replace us. Words, art, waiting tables, building cars….

Can’t ideally min it, can’t ideally fin it. Innovation delivers less than ideally for all parties involved equates to some on the streets homeless and some in penthouses gives feeling of laws, and profit established and delivered has amplified less than ideally over time.

Less required to deliver equivalent value (at least equivalent value perceived) is a consequential system. Same work of 1000 employees done by 100 – 900 employees without paychecks gets set to progress, ideal progress established and delivered. Our World has the potential to deliver more real value, more real value might equate to 100 doing the same work as 1000 yet should also equate to those 900 protected and re-enabled in real ways, ways that don’t devalue their humanity and service. One could question at times how much real value society desires to generate – we sometimes lag progress because we have yet to ideal that same problem. If we valued each other more, solved the progress LTIs for all parties problem we might already have a colony on Mars and Jupiter.

In a system that devalues like it does, and utilizes dangerous products, products like nuclear power to achieve ends – AC (Air Conditioning) as owed by the system, as a requirement, human right seems apt in a Global Warming World, especially in Texas. Might be causing future generations of family to mutate or have to dismantle dangerous weapons shouldn’t factor into greater access to air conditioning today?