I have had cybersecurity problems with this site in hard to fully appreciate ways. Makes me want to potentially go back and re-read content to verify though reading back has made me aware of potential liabilities, and aware that some value that was meaningful was set to less public access. The combination equates to value and established and delivered was not deterministic.
Already was that way to a certain point, but imagine if you wrote a book, and then the publisher changed some chapters dramatically, then someone else read and changed words and republished again. Original value far different than delivered value potentially hard to fully represent.
I have provided free content, I wanted to provide a lot of free content and training yet I was limited and oppressed. Oppression factored into stating that all content on this vlog was free at a certain point (I think, can’t find it and oppression including cyber security problems has made that more difficult). Historic record on this site set to far less than ideal seems wise and jading. Some content is free, others is not mine to give away including videos from other sites, yet some is learning which makes capacity to claim ideal ground on copyrights and IP law more convoluted. In combination it is all jading.
I feel like God has sufficiently established value and consistency on delivery, appreciation for my work would be untrue. Oppression made value out less in hard to fully appreciate ways would be a bit of an understatement. Just because one might deliver A level work (and while I don’t believe all of my work here is A level work, I think some is high quality, high quality that could lead to more peace and less oppression, more people alive at the end of the day) does not equate to A level work is maintained. Statue of David never gets graffitied because nobody protects it? Protection for artists closer to the Vatican might be hard to fully appreciate.
The oppression and less than ideal determinism cannot be guaranteed was not Ultron (Marvel Comics, not my names thus not free to give – require everyone to state this while referencing and alluding?) level AI.
The future might be more considerate of artists and positive paths. Laws and a System that is jading might lead to more artists in bars than painting, fully appreciated? Art a path that is positive and far less than ideally invested in to remain ideal positive output seems apt. I could go to a bar, or I could spend my time making political art, giving the world more potential to see oppression?
Knowing output is 1% of the value it likely could have been if left unoppressed? Not all ideal value to say that 99% of value desired to give to make society and the world a better place was limited likely factors into defense for all people on this day and day forward. My judgment, assessment is less-than-ideal, might be greater than 1%, does not equate to my capacity to verify limited is ideal value either. Volume knob tells how loud something is, in for a reason, does not equate to we know how things are heard by others. Verified met is less than ideal, met and requirements blocked not ideal either.
If my value output is LTISO (less than ideal sin out), think I can really afford being limited to 1% of volume meant?
I think some of the dreams I listed, wrote about have been modified in non-ideal ways though I can’t verify this, this far in the future – experience significant health problems back then. Keeping backup copies and realization backup copies could be modified under oppression is likely not fully pondered. More than one source of truth factors into less-than-ideal time costs.
Reading some of the content also makes me a bit concerned about other content on the vlog, how it could change – life and death topics equates to set wrong could be problematic in not fully appreciated ways. The combination might be a way for oppression to limit value out. Imagine having a prisoner manifest where records were set to names like Ipee Freely – less security might lead to all prisoners free might not equate to best value for society.
My content is a drop in the bucket compared to God’s content, miracles. That said some of my content included re-amping videos on Hostage negotiations, helping free people stuck in jail. I am not God, I can’t deliver miracles, that said having support I meant for the world limited is potentially problematic. I don’t know how much value I add, I don’t want to say my support limited might have made things harder for people, that said support limited is consequential. LTISO can’t add support would theoretically equate to nobody can add support. LTISO – less than ideal sin out. LTISO people get upsold to Innocent, because people don’t always justly deal with others that are LTISO being LTISO themselves.
People’s paths are directional. If they see it is too hard to make gains in adding support to the system, they might think the only way to fix it is by removing it wholesale. There is value added in enabling LTISO (lets call them Innocent) to add value to society. How one sees self-factors into confidence, confidence that is likely to work in people’s favor. I support the system, I don’t rob and oppress a thought pattern that is reinforced is valuable.
Oppression that has been leveraged against me has potential for being used in my defense. Can’t say it was all good, does not equate to I can’t turn it into a win win, does not equate to I want to make it common ground, factored into expectation. Everyone has to be beaten, made miserable so Authority feels sorry for them is a possible system I would not like to turn up.
My Tech Blog 