If one family has 1 child, and 9 AI children.
If another family has 4 children, and 6 AI children.
Both families are allowed to learn? People are allowed to invest in people and systems that learn, yet people that invest in more people have potential for protected better – with likely both ideal and non-ideal implications. Have to have 15 children to be able to profit and survive might be less than ideal value established.
People are greater than systems, systems that can learn have the potential to be limited, in ways that might profit some parties over others.
Biggest Catholic Family, versus woman with only cats in a system that limits who people talk to? Value out can be limited for some, increased for others is a less than ideal system. Capacity to invest can be reduced for those that don’t have sufficient number of children seems less than ideal. Single voice to less is consequential.
I don’t want big families devalued, and I also don’t want single people with less support devalued further. System that claims sufficient value added is subject to debate?
One person pursues a large family, another person pursues a field in research and science. The one that pursues research does not have to be sufficiently protected has potential for turned up at times in life. Set to mad scientist, human test subjects is possible less than ideal contrast. All investments, success are bit of a test for society. Most supported person in room required for support is a less than ideal system.
My Tech Blog 