A like in grade of 100%.
Feeing at A level of hurt is unwise. Take electricity for example. Electricity leads to non-zero number of child electrocutions every year. Yet we don’t require every person to see all the faces of every child every time they turn on the light switch or the air conditioner.
A less punishing world is desirable, far from a given by default. Every time someone turns on the ignition to a vehicle they are required to see the mangled faces of the victims in car crashes? It is unwise to Fee at A level – people don’t like it reinforced on the common does not equate to people don’t always turn up and reinforce something they would not appreciate in return.
A man walks in front of a strip club and is stoned to death with screams of adulterer, he was actually trying to go to the shop in front of the strip club, but details are less than ideally turned up. Doesn’t have to be stones to be set to less, set to less can wreck lives.
Those that fee at A level, might be feed at A level – thus wiser not to fee at A level. Might lead to no car and no electricity. Having a system that is less than ideal equates to necessity for grace and forgiveness, feeing at less than A level.
Pay for the shit you turn up, you need to pay for that, I need to pay for that, we get to assess and judge that are all less than ideal systems.
I don’t want to be Feed at A level every time I turn on the lights or turn on a car and I want to be appreciated for my contributions to society?
Free Starter Image
god of allows contributions to be finned, min-ed?
People wouldn’t want their ambulance disabled remotely before arriving at a critical time, yet cybersecurity that factors into my success is allowed to be limited. What is the power in the loss of a head start, funds lost today that factors into capacity to pay an ambulance tomorrow? The problem is someone might be feeing me at A level, now how to correct without Feeing at A level? I want the problem fixed, not others sitting without electricity or a car.
My Tech Blog 