Subversion

The term G in the urban dictionary says Friend, also refers to Gangster

I don’t want to be rude or reinforce racial stereo types. I have heard the phrase G-ing something to refer to messing something up, making something non-deterministic, and looking for synonyms in the dictionary found the word subversion.

Undermining principles sometimes useful, sometimes common. Law gets set to ideally established and delivered on ideal grounds with ideal comprehension with ideal Golden Rule amplified for all parties subject to a particular law.

People sometimes have words and phrases that are taught, without always being given other choices of words, other paths that might lead to less problems, less financial losses. What people reinforce matters, gets set to has been delivered ideally by default.

Investment in learning matters. English and Language, Communication is one place where people have the potential to learn yet is not always valued to the level it should be. Less valued does not always equate to ideal capacity to argue or defend one’s points of views.

People that have hard hearts, that are set in their ways, have no desire to make peace or a positive path forward for all parties might be subverted at times via systems like CFB – Cute Funny Beautiful. There is reasons at times to reduce seriousness, reduce belief that system and practices have been delivered in ideal manners with ideal problems reduced. Subversion has potential to remind of the need for grace, test people that might be hard nosed, that might want to remove all flex from the system.

I don’t always make things less deterministic on purpose, I have potential to add randomness without that being my goal. Rockstars, People on Stage, and People that Grab Focus are all examples of things that might make life less deterministic. If I go walking down a street and there is someone performing music on the side, it is inspirational, nice to hear. It also makes the experience less deterministic. Walk from point A to point B with no problems nothing new is deterministic, yet deterministic seen as the more valuable path is not always true. That said non-deterministic systems can be miserable as well – imagine you have your life set out in front of you, instead of the determined path you are thrown in jail for a non-deterministic point in time. Altered path sometimes desirable, not always desirable.

Re-branding is useful, subversionist to Value-Added Randomization Rockstar? Celebrated for randomness I add without belittled for it? Public Relations and Re-branding exist for a reason and are useful, win wins are a potential problem solving path not always ideally entertained. Permanent labels are problematic, have potential for less than ideally set.

I am a programmer, I use vars, value-added randomization, set sometimes, not always equates to get

Reliability that is the same results for 99 days does not equate to the same results for 100 days. That does not equal it is, that does not equal reduced capacity and desire to verify is a non-consequential system. People might revisit cases more often given that as a known, does not equate to people likely always question reliability of evidence, evidence that’s comprehension is dependent upon underlying system’s reliability – reminder though not a lawyer or expert witness.

Ideal value established reinforced on the common is a consequential system in my opinion. Not usually a problem for me gets set to sufficient, sufficient factors into repetitions, repetitions reinforce claims to truth, potentially in non-ideal ways. Triple modular redundancy – truth in more than one place is sound truth?

Updated March 23, 2024 – was thinking a bit on this post. I do not want to reinforce racial stereotyping or undermine the seriousness of the topic. Truth is people with less training, less in the know might refer to someone as G, and they might mean that as a friend, as a gangster or subversionist. I know it might amplify less than ideally in practice, inflection in voice, thus I stray from the term might not equate to all people know. Encouraging better communication might lead to bridges and peace built tomorrow, likely not always pondered in a fast paced world that is far from ideal competition and desire to maximize profit reduced. Desire to be less jading to the world might not always equate to trained the ideal words to be less jading.