Deferred Judgment

Better wait until one gets all the facts before Judgment?

Problem with deferring judgment is one might be given facts, facts that might make one think judgment is sound, a good system to turn up.

The Bible says don’t judge.

Turn up the possibility of judgment? No potential for temptation in that?

I don’t need the facts, the facts might make me think I can judge sufficiently.

Is it a fact, that facts always lead to less bias?

Facts are based on review by sight

Facts like the following image exists

Zero potential to bias, zero potential to obfuscate truth?

Review all relevant data only once, when some data is so cute? Review only once or multiple times, claim ideal bias reduction?

A system that is biased by CFB – Cute Funny Beautiful might not always be ideal bias out.

Who determines relevant data matters, might be less than ideally turned up? Reminder though I am not a lawyer.

A see one doesn’t owe? A like in grade of 100%? Yes or No equates to judgment, judgment based upon less-than-ideal grounds?

Know is not all good, not all should. Is that a fact? Biasing facts based upon learning, I warned you about that. You did? I did now.

Defend reading comprehension as a value-added system? Able to read warnings like High Voltage sign outweighs potential evils that are in books? Books that are LTIEO (Less Than Ideal Evil Out) have potential to teach other LTIEO systems like Acronyms, and Art. HP, High Potential, we can’t have our potential smoking pot – representation has potential to be changed in more useful ways depending on circumstance is less than always ideal value added. Candidates might be set to HP and competition might lead to less than ideal representation? Acronyms – I can choose a more useful representation to enable greater throughput?

HP4GTp – High Potential for Greater Throughput

The use of the word high, definition represented serves my purpose better?

Repetitions in Society matter, HP4GTp

How Potential for Greater Throughput? Use of word How instead of High might lead to more learning. One might use the letter A for an Example, a Variable, or an Answer? Set precedent of no consequence, words don’t have to be words? Say Golden Rule ideally delivers on representation that is LTI established and delivered? Technically utilizing what is allowed might deliver in less-than-ideal ways? Representation that is less than ideally straightforward gets set to fair game. Language not a system that has to be perfected to win.

Expectation of ideal use and representation of language seems to be too high of a burden to place on anyone does not mean the consequences feel all good. LTI delivery of Golden Rule IBD with competition and fact language and representation amplify LTI. Less than ideal delivery of Golden Run in by design with competition and fact language and representation amplify less than ideally.

People on different sides want to win, expect them to let each other win because that is what the other side wants (The Golden Rule)? Competition factors into which facts are found useful and relevant potentially not always entertained as important.

Christ of “seek and you will find, knock and the door will open” keeps information hidden for sake of fair game, equal playing field? Potential for find with delay, delay that prevents wins?