Humans set a price

Humans set a price, does not equate to price set is right, reasonable, or desirable.

The Bible proclaims Golden Rule. James 4:17 says knowing and not doing is sin.

Is Golden Rule always, or close to always delivered in process, systemic processes? No.

One party wins and another party wins gets equated at times to the 8 billion plus other people on Earth are 3rd party profiteers to the win win.

The Lord’s prayer says “Forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us” – forgiveness is desirable, grace for others is desirable. The problem I see is that does not always fix or repair all the losses that sin, less than ideal delivery of Golden Rule delivers on the common.

God has potential to fix, chooses not to on common feels less than ideal.

Lord’s prayer and Golden Rule in practice leads to zero lawsuits, zero lawsuits really ideal protection for lawyers? Golden Rule might at times lead to Golden Rule not delivered? Too legalistic way of thinking?

More sins happen on this day, same problems don’t get fixed, giving a head start to potential dictators of tomorrow, yet we say the same prayer?

We know reliance on foreign oil is problematic in certain respects. James 4:17 says knowing and not doing is sin. Yet change is hard, and repeating “Forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us” is easier.

Feels like sin is IBD, in by design, no real plan to solve, not call it out, let it to be set to sufficient on the common?

Capacity to limit sin is limited, directional – judging and assessing people should give way to fixing systemic problems theoretically, yet men and women that are sinful are less than ideal judgment out, less than ideally convolute the line between assessment and judgment at least from what I have seen.

Oil and gas leads to progress. One could say we shouldn’t rely upon fossil fuels because it hurts the environment, pushes money into the wrong hands. Another could say progress factors into protection, and people need protection in a World that is not ideal nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons out. Golden Rule is not always easy to deliver on, does not always have ideal reason and logic out on both sides of the argument, reason and logic that is further convoluted by money and profit.

The combination factors into wins and losses on this day, who is forgiven and who is not, who winds up on the street and in penthouse apartments. “Forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us” rings less true when real change and progress is not delivered.

People on either side of the issue required to call out strength in each other’s arguments? It is profitable to know the strength in the opposition’s arguments, it is also Golden Rule to want others to succeed and that is convoluted by desire to profit, desire to be right, to win. Both opponents calling out each other’s strengths might lead to less clarity in differences, relevance limiting for audience not of consequence? Win Win Loss is common, reinforce it by choice?

Doesn’t reinforce my point of view equated to less-than-ideal delivery of Golden Rule, and thus a trespass, a trespass that has potential to easily be absolved through a prayer, a prayer repeated on the common “Forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us”? Golden Rule leaves problems unsolved?