If something is labeled as Christian Content or Christian Art, expect it to get to people in areas where Christianity is oppressed? 1.4 billion people in China less supported is not what I want, Christians less supported is not what I want. Not labeled as Christian content might let others think Christians have no friends, might be able to be abused (like a Star of David in Nazi Germany). Labeled as Christian content might lead to people thinking it ideally inspires and instills Christian values, is ideally free of sin and if not, the publishers may be punished as if the Pope was committing sin. Making buy in cost harder is consequential, not always valuable.
I have questionable content on my vlog that is not suggested for all audiences, and I have Christian art on my vlog. Ideal separation might lead to one internet for Christian content, and one internet for everything else – which would likely create a divide, and create reduced proximity in concepts, concepts like Don’t Murder and Lingerie Shops. Greater separation has potential to lead to sandboxing – people running human trafficking rings might say sandbox all the Christians.
I don’t want Christians to be left without friends and support and I don’t want others to think they are justified in judging or punishing me based upon unknown, not fully invested in data. I have 3500+ posts, reading all of them as a requirement before trying to punish seems like a worthwhile requirement. Even if one does read all of my posts, that far from guarantees ideal perception and comprehension of what I have been through in my life.
Labels are powerful, iffed on whether to add a label Christian content or not Christian content feels like less than an ideal gift at times. Everyone on the news to required to wear a cross if they are a Christian, want to re-amp Christian values like don’t falsely accuse, without sin cast first stone? Would that really be ideal protection for people that don’t wear crosses? Not wearing a cross really ideal protection for Christians, inspiring Christian values?
Feels LTI in combination, less-than-ideal.
I am a man, I am less than perfection, I realize the following is an offset, a less than ideal offset, an offset that might lead to one person, if only one person making one less sin
Free Starter Image
Separation of Church and State is a less than ideal system. I realize some officers in the world are Christians. If they wore crosses that might scare people thinking there is less separation between Church and State. That is scary, thinking of Religious Theocracies like Iran. Yet officers not wearing crosses might be sending less reminders to follow the ten commandments. Claim the combination is ideal? Golden Rule assess it as ideally free of sin in combination?
Actors and Actresses, CEOs, Politicians, artists putting a cross at top of painting? Be inclusive not inclusive has shown precedent for amplifying in society. We all reinforce non-ideals in society yet we blame a small portion of society for sins we deem as more important?
Terrorists that hate Christians, might be protection in not wearing a cross. Golden Rule factors into me not wanting fellow citizens decapitated in an LTI world. Golden Rule factors into me not wanting fellow citizens depreciated in an LTI world.
DEPRECIATION Definition & Usage Examples | Dictionary.com
Not everyone can afford expensive Jewelry, one with a wood cross appreciated as much as one with a platinum cross? Better for nobody to wear a cross?
I don’t reinforce it, but I am glad someone does – as a collective (including self) societal sin?
Have to be ideal, reinforce only ideals, or set to zero value added is an LTI system.
Representation is less than ideal worthy of factoring into forgiveness, worth factoring into ground for all including self is less than ideal rock at times. High ground to a less knowable system factors into “without sin cast the first stone”, Christ’s teaching having more throughput.
My Tech Blog 