If man, that is less than ideal sin out, calls out hypocrisy in others, is he himself not being hypocritical? Hard to fix problems that when called out reinforce the same system one is trying to divest from.
Our system capitalizes on, reinforces image as useful makeup, masks, signs on buildings, corporate image. We all profit from it, not call out the hypocrisy in that?
Be less hypocritical said from a man in a power suit might ring less true. Yet we shouldn’t judge based on image, image like one that is delivered based upon a power suit. Man has potential to ideally divest seems questionable at best and seems to be reinforced as an ideal system for society at times.
Claim we don’t profit from people looking better, art looking better than it is at times? People (including self) that turn up truth obfuscated by charm and beauty get to claim ideal grounds on consistency of message and truth delivered?
I didn’t want it to represent all of the awfulness not relatable and I still care about truth delivered and not delivered?
Free Starter Image
People holding two contrary positions seems both hypocritical at times and in by design.
Each thorn injected into the scalp of Christ might make more doctors and nurses, yet I think my route is more encouraging, seem less like I am valuing pain as a value-added system. Claim ideal ground established and delivered, seems unwise. Better is not always better in all directions. Sorry green, red, and orange you got to take one for the team – stated silently?
God should have paved over all beauty that was built on former oppression like Pyramids and Roman buildings, streets before bringing me into the world? The past gifts the future on repeat. Throughput based upon past oppression stands the test of time might feel like a less than ideal lesson for people in history class? Slave owners, Nazis, taught themselves?
Course removed it might start sounding like a great concept again. Everyone in makeup, masks might devalue the oppression caused by makeup and masks? I know I add, might lead to less stones “without sin cast the first stone” – Christ. In by design equates to harder to ideally divest, has potential to make people think why invest in the first place at times. A little truth is not always sufficient truth. Truth to a less value system is consequential. People might think drugs and alcohol are in by design, can’t stop it, why not join it – is a less than ideal path to turn up. Drugs and Alcohol like reduced Truth, reduced Truth like Drugs and Alcohol? No one ever goes to the bottle based upon lack of answers, lack of answers established by reinforcement of devalued truth?
Let’s talk about classified documents. Truth limiting as a useful system as in by design is consequential. I have ideal time to review, perceive, and comprehend documents released to the public that were classified in the past? No. Less than ideal time and less than ideal training might lead to inability to assess released documents correctly? True. If others were to summarize the documents, they would have zero political campaigns, desires to profit from how the details are delivered? No. Truth Limiting that is In By Design leaves some people on the streets and some people in Penthouse apartments. Many CEOs and millionaires have likely worked hard for their profit, that does not equate to there is zero relevance limiting that works in their favor in by design.
The design is consequential, factors into NDAs (non-disclosure agreements) in companies that are generally tailored to benefit companies over the public at large. Reinforcing silence has potential for not always a value-added system. People aren’t given classes on whistleblowing in College – at least not when I was in College. We are teaching you a skill but it might lead to others leveraging your life in a way that requires loss of property, financial standing, good grace with others to protect society might inspire less than ideal completion of college? It will all just work out at critical times claimed to valuation of better training and verified comprehension not a given.
Truth limiting that is in by design does not always work against me or for me is likely a valid defense for anyone on this planet. Limiting relevance for those on the ISS, that’s just not right. Again, reminder though I want people free and I am not a lawyer. Courts are not required to factor in this non-lawyers opinion on right and wrong, thus what I see as a valid defense might not be fully invested in by Courts (wherever they may be).
If someone asks “How are you?” – how does one respond. Does one talk about the way society is oppressing them, potentially endangering others and self-more? Does one that might be doing less than fine and does not want to have a longer conversation always want to open up the door for time losses due to lengthy conversation? Is it a lie to say “I doing well” with a smile to encourage others, remind people I am grateful that I am breathing? Truth amplifies less than ideally by default, I reinforce it via some of my practices does not equate it to I think it is inconsequential and I care about Truth vs Not Truth. If someone lies when they put a High Voltage sign up, they might put one up in the wrong place. Vastly different systems that reinforce each other in non-ideal ways? It is important sometimes delivered less than precisely is less than ideal.
People don’t always defend each other. Providing each other with truth is not always used wisely for the other parties. Defending each other better might equate to less temptation, temptation that might be delivered via real truth. People don’t always reinforce trustworthy with truth, otherwise Christ might never had to say “without sin cast the first stone”. Call things out in a way that endangers other is Golden Rule, sufficient love?
Golden rule might deliver truth better for two parties, does not always equal Golden Rule for all parties that are beneficiaries of truth. Complexity feels as though is delivered less than ideally. The woman caught in adultery was left unnamed in The Bible at least from what I know. I am not sure it would be fair to leave anyone as the poster child for a sin in society, when society by default turns sin up. That said ground is iffed a bit in society with Hitler, Stalin, Caesar, and Nero. Leadership and Forgiveness, Grace less available is likely worthy of note – people aren’t always aware of why leadership needs more grace and forgiveness (self included). Won’t be forgiven factors into relevance limiting, relevance limiting does not always lead to ideal value established.
People are not always close enough to leadership to know what is a problem or is not a problem. Limiting grace based upon limited visibility potentially not always wise. I need a problem fixed might lead to not always treading lightly, though leaders do not always respect those that are less bold. Bold and filled with grace done right likely has greater potential for results. Timid does not ideally deliver, hurt does not ideally deliver.
Imagine you have a personal audience with a world leader and you have an important request. They are dealing constantly with others, on important matters, not interrupting is important, and the important request is important, how important? Potential for less bold delivery to equate to not delivering. I do not have an audience with world leaders currently (outside of connection to Christ), at least to my knowledge, I do believe hypotheticals around respect and grace, accessibility and boldness are useful for preparing.
My Tech Blog 