Caution Adult Content, reliance on YouTube adult vs not adult and system in a currently oppressive world thus child protections potentially likely to be less than ideal at least from my perception and comprehension
From a writer, not from Hollywood, not in the business
I like Movies, that said they add value, set to ideal value would be less than sufficient grace and forgiveness amplified in the world.
Movies are about capitalizing on less-than-ideal representation for profit. Movies are about capitalizing on less-than-ideal representation to convey messages, teach lessons without being held to the same accountability as teachers. Movies are about entertainment, encouragement – time used in a more enjoyable yet not always more valuable way.
Acting, ideal representation or not ideal representation?
Special Effects, ideal representation or not ideal representation?
Interesting, Cool, Cute, Funny, and Beautiful, ideal representation or not ideal representation?
Encouragement, ideal appreciation for details or less than ideal appreciation for details?
Narrative Control, potential for driven by profit, or never driven by profit?
A superhero that can fly can jump off a building yet I should not. Ideal or not ideal representation? Matters or does not matter?
Not all content for all people matters. Gets turned up less than ideally. Becomes harder in tough times like oppression, natural disasters, and wars where time costs are more expensive, and teaching is turned up less than ideally.
Movies are like rock stars, might sing a song that keeps me from being left in a corrupt jail. Movies are like rock stars – they turn up less than ideal representation that should not always be trusted, relied upon as solid ground. People that write Horror movies are not required to have psychology degrees – consequential or not consequential? My name is Jason, a name that has been used in horror movies – consequential or not consequential. If my name was Jack, think that is ideal reminders of Jack the Ripper out? What is delivered is based upon less-than-ideal teaching – Friday 13th was written years ago, not think there have been improvements in comprehension of the brain in 30 years?
What is written today will be, is likely to be ideal representation for those in 2054? Factor in all time costs for people watching enjoyable entertainment, CFB – Cute Funny Beautiful worldwide factors into doctors, nurses, police, and politicians of tomorrow?
Movies are in by design, in by design is set to useful, useful delivers less than ideally for all parties in the world. There is room for improvement.
I like movies about vampires, I like movies about dragons. I know what norms in storytelling and society turn up less than ideal representation, without conversation? No. Requirement for ideal conversation gets turned up before stories are written? No.
“But my job is to protect the public” said from a cop or politician, that never speaks to writers and content creators about value added and subtracted? I don’t have to comment on that, harder to comment on that gets set to ideal value established and delivered.
There is some content in libraries that I do not entirely agree with, and I do not know where that content is always. Lots of books in the world, requiring anyone to read all of them seems less than ideal, does not equate to in by design is not consequential. Calling out one in particular might be both useful and perpetuate injustice.
Question how one movie did things, that factors into personal gain? Personal gain dependent on calling out one movie (Jason – Friday the 13th), might factor into capacity to call out other movies? White coat on a Hispanic cartel drug lord (Lord of War reference) – ideal value added for South American politicians wearing white or not (this movie might not be in public domain yet, worthy of note I give allot of content away on this vlog yet I am not sure how kosher for that particular content – thus not free).
The following video is not mine to give away for free, useful to for comprehension
Might be less than ideal representation for people wearing lab coats.
I enjoyed the movie and the movie conveys some meaningful information about problems in the world. Less than ideal value does not equal no value.
Makes one see problems with profit at all cost, relationships driven by profit and lies.
All that said representation that matters might be turned up in meaningful ways at times. Green attire usually military in white is different, might be more important for others than myself to perceive and comprehend. Requirement to protect others might be less than ideal representation delivered for self. Less than ideal representation might saves lives does not equate to it is always established with precision.
I have watched allot of movies, remember some lines, far from remember all lines – yet that detail is memorable. Like Wolf of Wall Street shaving head (again not mine free to give).
The following video is not mine to give away for free, useful to for comprehension
Representation of Bankers and Profit Systems like Corporations is turned up less than ideally in a world that also delivers value insufficiently for all parties, time of this movie was around time of Occupy Wall Street.
Shaving head is resonant of military contributions though not sure I would want to claim that as a motivator. Potential for correlation to societal topics on a subconscious not conscious level for both writer and reader? Cusping always meant not meant? Extreme that is useful, entertaining might be less than ideal for all parties?
Tech problems, cybersecurity problems and oppression factor into less capacity to listen with headphones likely not always fully appreciated.
Bandwagon appeal less than ideal, reinforcement in men as less than ideal systems, less than ideal leaders?
Movie fans are valuable. Readers are valuable. People that review Art and Listen to Music are valuable. Turning up message is valuable, has potential to lead to lives saved, has less than ideal throughput by default.
Knowledge of what is In By Design, comprehension of what has been delivered is not always amplified. I think this commentary is valuable, others might too thus I write it. I also think there are many useful critical thinking and defense law amps that are inspired by movies. Movies have capacity to deliver on comprehension of complex topics in ways that entire courses of study might fail to deliver. Sales factors into delivery?
If one wants to have an inspired company, a place considered enjoyable to work at without becoming like The Wolf of Wall Street (again not mine to give)?
A value set earlier, under oppression feels less than ideal to have to recommunicate on a daily basis. Time costs that are more valuable to some get turned up in non-ideal ways. Not referring to movie here, complexity in combination has potential to feel snaky. I give away free content on this vlog, like knowledge, yet the ground between what is free to give and what is not free to give is iffed constantly, thus it feels like time losses are inspired that are less than ideal thus I use the term snaky.
It is hard to ideally value complexity in characters. Likely a lot of thought went into each of these characters represented here and they are just a few of the many many movies and books. Claim I ideally understand the power requirements of a cartel lord, need to remind all parties of dominance? Claim I ideally understand the power requirement of CEOs to not reinforce that concept? Complexity is in by design, complexity is in by design that I do not always perceive or comprehend, and that might factor into bias and loss.
Investment in comprehension requires investment in perception, and neither are time cost free. If I understood these characters better I might be able to add more value to the World than I currently do.
I haven’t played the game, does not equate to I think the trailer does not add value (again, not mine to give for free) useful for comprehension
Less grenades in hands of children might lead to less tyrants?
Imagine a supercomputer or someone amazingly familiar with Movie content could refer a perfect Movie for me to watch based upon this writing. What would it be? Gains have potential to lead to greater gains? What I say might convey knowledge on what I lack, and that might be less than all value out?
Each day supercomputers get faster and faster, ability to summarize content like books gets better and better. Recommendations today might be less than recommendations tomorrow. Head starts matter comprehended, head starts delivered does not equate to zero room for improvement on comprehension matters. Will recommendations be based upon zero bias? People that want you to succeed might not always have others best interest at heart. Winning matters, winning is not all that matters, in combination has potential to lead to less-than-ideal losses and less-than-ideal wins. Fee better is less than ideal better for all parties seems apt, reason for Forgiveness and Grace.
Learning factors into Wealth and Power. Wealth and Power factor into Greed. Teachers to ideally turning up learning without turning up Greed?
GREED Definition & Usage Examples | Dictionary.com
There is a certain amount of greed turned up by learning. A certain amount of sin turned up for power. That always factored into reasons for forgiveness, mercy, and grace? Government offsets always installed ideally? Grain surplus comes to mind (giant piles of food being unused, left to waste). I might be confusing the concept, a picture from the past comes to mind. Maybe price protection is what I am thinking of. Too much supply leads to lowered prices and profitability equates to supply delivery reduction to raise prices, keep profitability yet seems awful when a picture is put on it. Forgiveness turned up by learning potentially like that giant pile of grain, set to undeliverable?
Forgiveness and Grace set to higher cost to maintain profitability?
The following is some artwork I have created, Free for download and to create derivative works from
It is an offset, I realize it is less than an ideal offset. If I said it was ideal, would that be adequate humility appreciation for life requires more than art, one piece should not be set to ideal delivery?
We talk about the sins of some individuals at times without always talking about greed that is in by design based upon learning that is claimed as turns up ideals. What sins are focused on factors into high ground, potential for profit.
Attractive actors and actresses or more ideal representation of reality. Greed or no greed factors into representation?
The following video is not mine to give away for free, useful to for comprehension
Less refined representation might turn town homosexuality, yet also might have less throughput
Hollywood on Directional Profit? People like Art and Beauty equates to Throughput for Peace > amplification of Greed?
Free Starter Image
Some thoughts before rewatching the movie Seven on March 8th, 2024. Again reminder free content on this vlog does not include Movie Characters and Names I do not own.
What would a movie that is made up of all Red Heads, Gingers look like to Society?
Less ideal representation, artistic representation sometimes appreciated (like the Movie Sin City).
Complex topics between races might be able to be called out in less offensive way with Gingers talking about other Gingers?
Enough Gingers actors and actress available for sufficient representation? Maybe not.
New different, not always done sometimes has potential to move and inspire.
Combination of similar might turn up appreciation for different?
Ginger actors and actresses don’t need extra work?
Other actors and actresses don’t need extra work?
Actors and Actresses can’t dye their hair?
Appreciation for Red like a Bull Fighters cape always turned up?
Orange, more like prison jersey’s, parking cones?
Continued thoughts after watching the movie Seven.
Share an idea that might be accepted less than ideally?
Brad Pitt, Morgan Freeman, and Kevin Space reinforced as ideal representation of man, authority, and power consequential or not consequential? Cop with Orange hair always set to look the part, useful as an extra? I wouldn’t want other actors or actresses to play the parts does not equate to I think who plays the part is inconsequential, has zero potential to turn up reinforced non-ideal representation. Looks the part matters, gets set to less. On the plus side the Villains were not Ginger – cuts both ways. Pale skin doesn’t really look like a villain vs vampire movies as common?
Seven is more awful than I remember, possibly heightened by increased knowledge and time on this earth. Learn more and sometimes stories resonate in more awful ways than before. It easy to set to ideal value delivered based upon old content, yet the world to amplifying less evil does not amplify by default. Old content rewatched later might lead to valuable insight that might otherwise be missed.
Some of the words in that Movie and likely other movies might seem as almost if foreshadowed by the film itself, like inspiring the thought of the comment before it is delivered. Creepy resonance sometimes capitalized on likely many times by design.
Doesn’t matter if someone is Ginger or not, representation amplifies less than ideally is consequential to all.
Gluttony in that movie doesn’t seem to be as gross as it likely could be in my mind. I have tried to reinforce less bias toward overweight people does not equate to zero bias present – I am less than perfect, stand on less than ideal ground to call out others sins does not equate to I know how to think about it ideally. Cops sometimes referred to as pigs equates to desire to turn that down, health problems sometimes lead to overweight equates to desire to turn that down.
Lust kind of makes me want to vomit. Sin owes more sin is an awful concept – Evil repaid with Evil more awful than likely fully appreciated. De-amps are powerful, not always pondered – after watching that movie might not enjoy going to a lingerie shop or club with less conservative dress. Imagine every time you get in a car you see all of the worst car accidents in a video in your head, likely to make a safer driver or likely to lead to divesting from driving completely?
Movies from the past have potential to seem more consequential. One at 40 might see greater value in movies seen at 20. One at 60 might see greater value in movies seen at 40. I likely have not capitalized on all gains from Movies I have watched previously. Capacity to see sin, reinforce it less generates value.
The concept from The Bible See No Evil with the movie Seven? Bible reinforces sins as bad, the horror movie reinforces the sins as bad (less than ideally), humans reinforce sins are bad (less than ideally). See the evil without seeing the evil in seeing the evil? James 4:17 in regards to See No Evil? Movie Writers desire readers and viewers to comprehend Villains as Evil, desires readers and viewers to See the Evil in the Villains so people desire to combat it in society. Claim Golden Rule delivered for Movie Writers without Seeing the Evil in representation that is meant to represent Evil? Aid shark fin wind that is delivered by writers trying to profit?
My Tech Blog 