Without sin

Christ has a teaching “without sin cast the first stone”, used to protect a barbaric crowd from stoning an accused woman

Imagine someone tells God their sins and repents, or goes to confession. They have been absolved of their sins.

Are they now without sin?

Potential consequences – Priest that sees self as freed from sins sees self as allowed to throw stones, torture confessions out of people that deem to be sinners. Medieval Catholic Church and Salem Witch Trials the potential for riding the white horse of justice is there, is less than ideally turned up in history.

Absolved of sins and forgiven of sins does not equate to one is without sin in manner allowed to stone people, has ideal capacity to perceive and comprehend all relevant details, has turned up ideal reduced sin in society and trained all sufficiently to justify throwing stones.

Don’t Judge is also in The Bible, will it be viewed of greater importance than the words “Without sin”? Not a guarantee.

Golden Rule is also in The Bible, will it be viewed of greater importance than the words “Without sin”? Not a guarantee.

Some words valued higher than others matter in critical ways, not always entertained as desirable, necessary. It proves my point, all conversation and agreement necessary has already been delivered – is a possible less than ideal thought.

Free Starter Diagram based upon Christ’s Teaching “without sin cast the first stone” – I believe the diagram I created adds value, set to ideal unlikely to lead to progress that is desirable made – there for don’t set it to ideal, don’t set useful to ideal

Prosecutors taught to turn it down a notch might factor into less need for Prosecutors, fully pondered?

Desire to deliver justice might stem from desire to claim ideal perception and comprehension. I have high ground to call this or that out set to less might factor into greater safety for many, likely not always pondered, likely not always turned up as desirable, time freeing path.