If I study 6 years in a field, spend all nighters working through problems it is easy to desire self to be set to A (100%) know. Truth is spend 2 back-to-back life sentences in any field one likely still wouldn’t be A (100%) know and that is before including the fact the future brings new inventions which increase complexity, further decreasing A (100%) know as truth.
People go into careers with A know?
People go into marriages with A know?
Iffing on less-than-ideal comprehension is more truthful yet unlikely to be turned up on the common, confidence factors into delivery and encouragement.
People encouraged might give less than ideal Truth at times, less than ideal value established does not equate to it is more valuable for them to lose their confidence is likely not easy to fully ponder or estimate.
Expect A know from Leadership seems desirable yet it is important at time to comprehend confidence matters and information amplifies less than ideally at times.
Take imagination for instance. I think it is valuable, useful for art, useful for defending people and factoring in other possibilities. Could it be turned up to excess? Yes. I would always know what excess is? No. People will always talk about problems on journeys of learning? No. Might be more of a problem for some than others is likely not fully pondered. Things in combination like drugs I haven’t taken could create problems I can’t fully comprehend? Know an unknowable? Unlikely.
We have had movies, music, and art for years – they haven’t amplified ideally does not equate to Society and God has had zero practice with them, does not equate to Society always talks about or acknowledges all problems possible, or possible in combination. Less know is not established ideally and factors into safety.
What is value added for some situations might be seen as valuable in all situations. Take law for instance, considering both sides and how they affect society, hypotheticals around problems are valuable does not equate to zero-time costs, does not always equate to highest value generated. Someone that says Never Say Die to me or sends me a cease and desist? Both have potential to create value and subtract value – though less suing less reliance on legalism sometimes higher value added, more likely to lead to better communication fostered.
Attempting to deliver A (100%) know, think have to deliver A (100%) know might lead to zero support delivered. I care about defense law, I want less people oppressed, and I also realize that the wrong people more enabled not always a good thing. I invest in Defense Law with Faith God will look out for the unknowns.
I am not the one on the following video, I do find it valuable
I created following notes and art listening, I am not a lawyer the following image and notes on it are Free, Free to create derivative works from
I also think reducing bias factors into Peace and more fair ground established, again not the one on the following video
Hearing about Wars and Problems in the News all the time it is easy to forget it factors into biases potentially in non-ideal ways at times
I find the following video useful, might reiterate the idea categorize and classify is sometimes difficult and biases factor in, and categorizing and classifying possible biases, biases known factors into comprehension of possible. Again I the writer of this vlog am not the person on the following video
An important reminder, I want ideal Peace, I haven’t always listened ideally to news reports over time, I desire ideal Peace does not equate to I know exactly what that is, exactly how to get there
Free Starter Image to help
My Tech Blog 