Categorize and Classify with Images
Categorize and Classify with Images and iffy is likely not a fully appreciated system. Misses are possible, misses have potential to be turned up as useful. Like misspellings added on purpose.
Someone I know in the image or not someone I know in the image?
Details reduced, get obfuscated by design. A shot or video surveillance from someone behind where you can’t see their face, no potential for might be this person or that person?
Truth ideally established to known truth gets less than ideally established, gets reinforce in by design by systems like CFB – Cute Funny Beautiful
A (100%) feed may?

Claim ideal hear of words written before?
Encouraged feels good, encouraged has potential to lead to less attention to detail
Distinct differences matter, factor into better accuracy
Requirement to verify is less than ideal, is less than ideal time costs reduced, what if I post the original image again, instead of something different

Clearly distinct, and clearly similar, without ideal capacity to verify either image hasn’t been changed the slightest bit
A (100%) maintenance maintains verification by default? Sounds nice, many times delivers that way

Same image or different image, different position on the page or not different position on the page, different position matters or does not matter?
No obfuscation in beauty?

Spatial and Temporal locality factors into Summation (from not a neuroscientist)
Neuroscience and Art, occipital lobe pondered by non-doctors and non-nurses potentially not always amplified
All the images on this page are Free to download, Free to use, Free to create derivative works from
Sealed with Oxytocin generating Free Love?
