Defending Writers

I like writing, I like writers. Greater communication is possible, practice factors into knowns and unknowns.

Words written are sometimes written for story. Story is enjoyable experience that amplifies better for some than others, fireman reading a book while a building burning down?

Writers knowing what they can be blamed for amplifies less than ideally. The World is less than ideal Word Play and Puns out. The writer does not have to comprehend all possible ways something read has potential to be comprehended.

Less than ideal comprehension, less than ideal training, less than ideal knowns all factor into what is written and not written, words chosen and not chosen. That does not even include less than ideal perception – I might write something that in combination with 8 billion other people, writings, and news doesn’t jive well. Benefit of doubt amplifies less than ideally and factors into grace available.

Writers would be wise to turn up grace as it factors into their ability to not be left in tatters. Words written are not always built on ideal health or ideal comprehension. Words written are not ideally typed (typos happen), writers are not required to have ideal grammar, not reinforce non-ideals.

Linguistics and Words is not a system that is left in stone. God said build on rock, yet that could be convoluted. Rock Music or Rocks? Gravel? Shifting ground possible, people not required to comprehend all World events at time of writing. Same goes for Art, I might paint a painting that might be seen 10 years from now and someone might think how on Earth, why on Earth would they paint something like that. Context required to be ideally understood is not true, and that as a known is not always understood by artists or writers at time of initial investment. Past has potential to gift future in non-ideal ways is not something that should be ideally turned up.

That said might lead to feeling of less requirement of responsibility for writers and artists. Artists and Writers left free with no feedback not always corrected in course and direction might sail into dangerous waters, claim ideal Love and Golden Rule without discussion?

I like painting flowers for instance, I might post some of my paintings. Does not equate to it might not be unwise on a day there are funerals, people dying in the world. Yet everyday there are people going to funerals, dying in the world should be equated to never post a picture of flowers?

I am not a Chinese national, I do like the candles in the sky festival they have

Claims of A (100%) unique writing and directionality chosen, negation of derivative works? There is potential likely with 8 billion people that someone else has written the same sentence before, make the writer find that before writing it? Unique combinations required feed may feed may not? Same book different cover unique or not unique? Always said about same book?

There are certain countries in the World where oppression equates to not all things written are published. Since the writer can’t read those writings, and does not desire to capitalize on non-ideal ground that less than ideally values the oppressed? Equates to the writer should not write anything?

I don’t want to amplify oppression and if someone in North Korea wrote something similar to what I am writing, I wouldn’t know, owned? Not required by the law, ideal Golden Rule, love for others amped?

A (100%) fin (shark fin) negate silence possible, not wise to turn up

Owe A didn’t deliver A – not a useful known? Trappable. Legalism and Law to protected freedom rather than reducing it?

I know dehumanization is wrong and I like thinking about myself like this dog? I don’t want to be viewed as an animal and I desire to be free. If I were more fluffy people might like to trap me less, fully valued?

Can’t do it alone, following video might help