Could AI lead to increased comprehension of Physics?
Safer Roller Coaster vs Nukes?
AI as a special name is likely not fully appropriate, many systems in the World are not fully deterministic.
I don’t want to be nuked and non-deterministic systems might factor into me not being nuked.
Some people have potential to profit more from learning is likely not fully appreciated. You stop working on that and I keep working on that is not likely to be a fair and just system in all cases. Better equipped not required to deliver better for all parties kind of in by design in non-ideal ways at times.
Fee fair delivered. Fee justice delivered. Fee capacity always delivered seems apt. Fee comprehension delivers in way that makes fair and justice comprehendible always seems apt. Aid delivers better for me, or worse for me, a truly comprehendible system? Negate ideal comprehension not of potential for dire consequence? I deserve A level comprehension others deserve A level comprehension, yet in practice I don’t think system delivers that way.
Some thoughts of Marvel’s Avengers and Warnings from Hollywood lost in Charm of Special Effects. Villains in Movie not seen as real matters, potential for real likely not always entertained.
Inned feed (as in fee) more is expensive, not always ideally turned up
What is disclosed and not disclosed by corporations factors into support. Boston Dynamics is useful for example yet far from the only corporation worthy of more ideal investment in monitoring for safety and research ethics concerns.
People get old, comprehension has potential to be leveraged.
Ultron with a medical degree might save my life?
A future that is not deterministic will be attempted to be determined
Companies see all tech that other companies are working for? Combinational awareness potential for less than ideal. I know how it works to I don’t know how it works possible in new conditions, different environments. 8 billion people, lots of companies, combinational possibilities set to ideally comprehendible? Not all knowledge that is known (knowns amp less than ideally) is factored into design, fully appreciated?
Marching forward like in the case of arms race is not always left with ideal capacity to turn down
Engineers that have more knowledge might have their visibility limited at times for both good and bad reasons. People that profit factor into perception of good and bad is gray not fully comprehendible.
Those Robots used in searching terror tunnels in Gaza? Perceived as can’t get away with might factor into less desire. Mine clearing robots not a new idea, reminders we are in 2024 potential for allot of new gains not fully comprehendible not always turned up.
Imagine there is a company named Jason’s Robotics. My name is Jason, just giving an example. Should that company be required to expected to benefit all of humanity because it is capitalizing on useful technology, game changing technology, technology that has potential to be non-deterministic and dangerous? Setting precedent matters, less than ideally turned up. People always agree ideally on what is the benefit to most parties? All parties always required to be acknowledged and taken into consideration?
Who sets bars matters, who sets societal benefit met matters. If I am in Jail I might not feel like Boston Dynamics is meeting the bar I set? Could happen to a future Boston Dynamics employee, or someone from a similar company, worth acknowledging the potential.
Engineers and Research Scientist likely to be feed at A grade level not turn up A level protection and prevention? Trustworthy might create the company does not always equate to trustworthy will have ideal capacity to keep the company out of the hands of Evil.
Imagine my opponent and myself are both twice as smart as we are today. Greater intelligence, more possibilities known factors into potential for Peace over War. Should I invest in opposition based upon known possibilities, or invest in training for both competition and self to increase number of possibilities, better trajectories? More comprehension turned up as a desirable system.
Does Comprehension and Knowledge amplify with Sufficient Love and Grace? Trying to find a puzzle piece might not equate to ideal desire to make sure that puzzle piece, the puzzle being completed benefits all of society, not just some of society. I put the last piece in the puzzle always leads to show others the completely work? Can a bluff be delivered without desire to deliver a bluff? Yes. See I don’t have all the pieces, yet I might desire to look like I have all the pieces put together? Let it stand could be equated to lying, relevance limiting? End of conversation chosen by man leads to ideal Truth? Don’t know what to fix, don’t know have to fix is likely to be in by design.
Reality at the level Truth amplifies less ideally I am surprised we don’t have more problems than we do, another potential reason to believe in God.
My Tech Blog 