System Reinforces Oppression Perceived

Oppression factors into who has money and who does not.

Oppression factors into oil.

Oppression factors into food lines.

Oppression required to be 100% reduced would lead to inability to deliver anything.

That said

Purchased perceived as oppression matters

Imagine there is someone who has been wronged by a system dramatically in a way that would cost that system billions in liabilities to pay out sufficiently.

Now imagine that person does not fight to get that massive payout because they know others in the system need it.

Imagine that person is payed a small government wage – a concession potentially less than ideal less than ideally established.

Now imagine that person wants to buy Oil. Less than ideal oppression reduced not allowed from those that use government wages, fully comprehended?

Fair delivered always equals fair delivered? Fair perceived based ideal grounds? Not a cop, not government always valued as not a cop, not government? Not a cop visits lingerie stores, no potential for slippery slopes? Not a cop buys cat food with their government funds when they know cats reinforce non ideals?

Grade of A (100%) Oppression reduced desired as ideal could lead to starvation. Not good enough go back to the drawing board, with throughput?

I get to control, reinforced not always a good thing

Not a cop from a military family, might not always feel like ideal government reduced – Not a cop might be perceived as a cop not always fully appreciated

From a cops family, also equates to not a cop that might be perceived less than ideally

Citizen that works with the government but is not in the government? Not a cop yet proximity factors into classification?

Desire for making the world a better place requires ideal conversation with ideal classification? Well meaning people might amplify less than sufficient conversation for purpose of protection.

See funding iffed, investments limited in ways that reduce throughput.

Imagine if one woman, determined to stop adultery wore a hazmat suit and a sweater in the Texas summer to reinforce modesty. Even if this one woman did that – which I don’t think is wise to do because heat stroke is very possible, that does not equate to everyone else would. Impacts made in meaningful ways matter, ways that are safer matters. Real conversation matters, when it doesn’t deliver sometimes people go to great lengths in not always ideal ways.

How sin is valued matters, as something we all in part add to or as a reason to pick up stones. ”Those without sin cast the first stone”, similar far from exact systems matter an amplify less than ideally, harsh words could feel like a stoning, might inspire them. Sin leads to death, or perceived we all contribute to sin leads to life?

Adultery kind of in by design feels less than ideal, beats people being stoned to death. Some sins valued higher than others feels both right and wrong at times. Lies and white lies might seem like no big deal. One day someone accusing might lie, limit relevance when you are on trial. Lies might factor into choices for violence, lies limited correctly not a given. Truth known to deliver and be established less than ideally factors into reminder we all contribute to sin, life beats incorrect assessment and judgment. If ideal truth factored into a person who lies life, society will go back and correct the lies and training from the original delivery first? Fail to stop at source, fix in correct way does not equate to ideal justice delivered. Lies don’t equal murder, lies can lead to murder, yet murder for good reason is valued differently than establishing truth less than ideally.

Does the system amplify sufficient oppression reduced in your life to justify it using the death penalty, asked to every person on Earth and in Space? Put them under oath? Claim to have ideal grounds for Justice, not verify it?

System that is less than ideal lies out is unlikely to be able to protect my life, those lives I care about ideally. Enjoying each day matters, not a guarantee. System might not be ideal does not equate to hasn’t given me many good years. Could be better matters, less than ideal matters, appreciated for value added matters. All value added appreciated not always easy with less-than-ideal truth in by design. Gratitude with truth iffed harder, still important. How much should the Church be appreciated? Truth factors into valuation, truth comprehension and perception is less than ideal factors into valuation. We all know enough to accept words from the Vatican as God in flesh speaking? If I perceived and comprehended better I might accept that, if I perceived and comprehended better, factored in potentials for humanities less than ideal nature I likely would not accept that. Fee pride matters, fee I can’t ideally see pride matters. I see ideally equated to pride? Don’t judge, assess value out from Church as valuable vs not valuable? Fee see met seems apt, reminder though I am not a lawyer

I can’t always see all the value The Church adds equates to I get to limit it seems less than ideal. Value added seen required for value added not always wise.

Support that matters not seen might equate to left in Jail or Prison is seen as sufficient support added. People with vlogs, easy access to post have more capacity to show contributions to society, more proof. Proof and Truth amplifies in ways that is more useful to some than others unlikely to always be ideally appreciated. You added value you have to prove it? No resume equates to no support added? Society and Corporations reinforce not on the resume, doesn’t have to be factored in. Hard to deliver more ideal throughput of Golden Rule without Think Better of Others. Reasons to have examples heard matter and there is only so much stage time to hear all examples. 8 billion people all examples heard to value a life unwise. CFB – Cute Funny Beautiful might not lead to important examples heard.