Wars and World Events might make it harder to see that AB Testing, Corporate Strategies have potential to both add and subtract value in dramatic ways
Understanding the concept is important (reminder I the writer of this vlog am not the one on the videos, I do appreciate have videos to reference on AB Testing)
7 A/B Testing Questions and Answers in Data Science Interviews | by Emma Ding | Towards Data Science
All states might not get same version likely not always ideal trust reinforced
Companies required to give ideally similar experiences? Factors into consumer confidence, consumer protection – at least perceived, and delivered might be perceived as zero bias
All technology is somewhat an AB Test, each product has a certain level of variability
Bias and Corporate Profit drives vastly different experiences might not always be ideal for representation in legal cases, in maintaining a fair and equal Society, different political parties not required to get same experience?
Hire two CEOs show each making speeches to a group of people and then pick the one to leave hired at the end? Research Ethics is corporate practices is desirable and delivered far less than ideally.
AB Testing is Powerful, has potential for being problematic, problematic in a way that is not always understood by all parties, all parties that represent truth. Two AB tests might have different numbers and statistics – see which one better couldn’t be amplified?
AB Testing has potential to lead to better experience, better experience is not always amplified in societal environments that allow oppression (that sadly still exist in 2024)
Imagine if colleges had two of the same class, different professors? Class A and Class B then test at the end, claim ideal truth represented ideally same between the two?
Changes might lead to better, better is up to debate at times in non-ideal ways
Most users guaranteed to see things the same way thought to AB Testing known to known does not deliver that way. Truth is not represented ideally is unlikely to be appreciated by law enforcement. One lingerie version for the police one with human trafficking victims might be possible.
Not 50% 50% for AB Tested likely not always fully appreciated. Could be 99.99% and 0.01%. Competition could have their experience robbed in hard to fully perceive or comprehend ways.
AB Testing known reinforces initial path not always set to ideal. Refinement both necessary and valuable many times in products and services.
Ability to have fair and just elections is dependent upon equal and fair experience that is not always delivered ideally
All defense attorneys likely to know technology experience has the potential to vary widely and truth is lost in complexity is not a fully appreciated system?
Strong consistency claimed to be delivered might not be actual experience, especially in an AB Testing World – might be better to say consistency not always consistent
Inability to claim ideal consistency might lead to less provable for FBI, better experience delivered in advance matters in not fully appreciated ways
Looks like no human trafficking, child labor might not equate to reality is hard to fully appreciate without the concepts
Resources that are vastly restricted for government agencies factors into value delivered and not delivered, truth iffed not always good
More costly fix has potential to lead to not fixed, for capitalized on for not fixed
Inability to comprehend value delivered or not delivered might lead to funds reallocated likely not fully appreciated
Funds don’t always equate to money, sometimes funds equate to time, investment in caring
No direct link to government agencies is hard in not fully appreciated ways at times. Value delivered not always acknowledged. Desire for better does not always equate to full comprehension of problems.
Keeping people out of the battle, de-know sometimes is the more protective route. People that might mean well might not always mean ideally well. Win wins possible more power here less power there potentials.
Support delivered based upon ideal ground to not ideal ground known?
Less know on Lingerie sites not always good more know on Lingerie sites not always good? Less eyes on problems always less expensive?
I am not authority or an officer, I do have an opinion as a citizen of The USA and The World:
In the battle against human trafficking, child labor does not guarantee experience A or experience B. Higher cost consistency equates to greater complexity, greater complexity has potential for less-than-ideal investment. People that cooperate with authorities should be valued highly. Valued highly factors into divestment seen as possible and desirable. The past leverages the future more divested from in advance is valuable. Free might be a brighter flashlight in dark places.
Anxiety amps, coping mechanisms are useful
Fend a low, fend an experience doesn’t deliver consistency might be not fully appreciated? (Reminder I the writer of this vlog am not a lawyer, I do care, also a reminder I am a man not any of the people on these videos)
Corporations unlikely to always know the non-ideals they reinforce freedom and safety combined deliver in less-than-ideal ways.
Important reminder people trying to protect crime operations might flag false positives, get people to buy in to see who is not loyal to the operation. The combination likely does not always deliver ideal truth perceived and comprehended. Someone doing wrong does not equal not brilliant level of intelligence. I am smart enough to outsmart high level investment in AB delivered society could be called into question.
There are PhD’s in neuroscience in the World. I have a BS and MS in Computer Engineering, claim I can’t be outsmarted, claim there aren’t knowns in that I don’t know? Heroes with less than ideal know allowed to contribute?
I am also not the man on the following video, I do think it reinforces importance of the concept
Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire – Wikipedia
Accessibility to this document might be, likely is limited. Limited for people that are both victims and potentially leveraged by organized crime is likely not fully respected. In know and out of danger is valuable, hard to perceive and comprehend what people don’t go through themselves.
Aid low is valuable, always allowed to be valuable?
My Tech Blog 