I am not a Doctor, or a Lawyer – some thoughts
Levels of contrast required for action get equated to sufficient representation – a wheel might need to squeak loud to get fixed does not equate to highest level of contrast, contrast that will lead to action, action such as will fix is always truthful or ideal representation established. It is understandable someone or a group of people might desire sufficient levels of contrast perceived and comprehended to get action, yet over amounts, stronger amounts might be generated in pursuit.
If someone says they have pain that is 4 on scale of 10 might not get fixed. If someone says they have pain of 10 on a scale of 10 more likely to get fixed, equated to pain of 4 not a problem, 10 was likely ideal representation. People that have potential to raise comprehension of problems better might be more likely to get their problems fixed, thus using voice to help others is potentially more valuable than people always ponder. If 4 is not respected, blame someone for claiming 10 when fix is desirable, and 4 is known not to deliver? Society (including myself) potentially reinforce non ideal truth by requiring high levels to perceive and comprehend need for action.
If someone else has a problem with an unknown level, say it is a 4 on scale of 10 or a 10 on scale of 10? Desire to help others, implement Golden Rule might never obfuscate truth? Well-meaning people that fight for each other might convolute truth, not all good, and not all bad. People that get their problem fixed might have extra freedom (and their problem fixed first might have or might not have been ideally established) thus carrying it forward to help others seems wise.
Less than ideal representation factors into problems solved does not equate to more adequate representation is always likely to be turned up at another date. Speaking in generality, think of the fact that stories and movies can highlight really important problems in society, yet might highlight them in a very shocking way that might lead to problem perceived at a much greater level than actually exists. The actual problem is a problem, the problem perceived at much greater level is sometimes terrifying.
The loudest voice, the voice that sways the most hearts might be set to the one with the most ideal capacity to perceive and comprehend truth non ideally. Delivery of Charm does not require ideal truth delivered initially. A leader has potential to be charming, truthful, yet what is required for them to give ideal representation of truth might be obfuscated from their view. Accurate representation of what is said in a movie, YouTube, or article might be directly correlated to accurate representation. Well-meaning people that speak truthfully do not and are not required to ideally track down the most truthful representation.
Most truthful representation might require probing line of questioning, yet Golden Rule might state probing line of questioning not really how others wish to be treated. The most adequate representation of truth not always the most morally right? The most adequate representation of truth factors into reason and logic, thus reason and logic while sometimes ideal is not always ideal.
Leaders that win via Charisma might be set do ideal paths to start pursuit of Truth. 2024 equates to we are past potential for relevance limiting and obfuscation due to being charmed? It’s nice, desirable to think the future, technology ideals political systems though I don’t think that is how the future and technology have amplified at least during my lifetime. Progress and Change is forward never backwards, up and never down is a nice thought though not really full appreciation for the continuous work required to make change and societal gains have greater throughput for the future. Change that is more maintainable is more sustainable.
My Tech Blog 