Discouragement Limits Throughput
The Church teaches the Golden Rule. If the Golden Rule had ideal throughput, when someone else succeeds we would all be happy, be supportive – that is not how the World seems to work.
One fixes ProblemA, yet ProblemB, ProblemC, and ProblemD left unfixed? What if you are or your support is ProblemD? It makes sense people desire support and seeing others supported when they are not has potential to be hurtful.
That said if someone fixes ProblemA and then are demoralized, discouraged expect ProblemB, ProblemC, and ProblemD to be fixed once the wind is out of their sails? Proclaim the injustice or reinforce the good while attempting to minimize the bad without obfuscating truth?
Supernovas, Blackholes, and Galaxies the Universe is a beautiful place. Yet the Universe and The World is not always a beautiful place. It might be desirable at time to make everything cleaner – organization, everything in its place factors into encouragement, clear thought, and clearer direction. The combination might lead to never desire to get dirty, never to incur liability by getting involved, trying to help others.
No Risk No Reward is somewhat useful saying to inspire Love, taking on increased risk by choosing to fix ProblemA, ProblemB, ProblemC, or ProblemD first. Fix one problem first one will risk increased liability increased visibility of not fixing other problems. Curing injustice in the system doesn’t find the cure for cancer, curing cancer doesn’t cure injustice in governments. Demoralize and Discourage the person that tries to reduce injustice because they don’t cure cancer? Demoralize and Discourage the person that tries to reduce cancer because they don’t cure injustice? Try to solve both claim zero love? claim ideal love?
Success has potential to bring Critics. Success also has potential to save lives, make things better. If I was the person with ProblemE I might desire to call out the injustice, yet it might be potentially more wise to reinforce the good in the successes. Problems left set to unknown does not ideal, problems known and acknowledge not fixed is discouragement, demoralization of its own, those that have potential to fix problems demoralized, discouraged, and limited has potential to factor into less throughput, into reinforcing perceived as less throughput by choice.
Being a Critic does not always ideal, problems not acknowledged does not usually ideal – criticism might not always amplify in encouraging way does not equate to problems less known is always higher value added. Problems perceived and comprehended without perceived and comprehended as discouragement and demoralization not a given, right words and grace matters, forgiveness for unknowns matter, don’t judge factors into what needs to perceived as in need of being forgiven. Acknowledged as a problem might leave something in the air, bring in thought paths that are non-null time costs? Should I forgive or should I not forgive, what is the level of the problem, is there similar problems? Thought paths that take time and do not always amplify less judgment, judgment that is in direct contrast to don’t judge.
Feedback delivered in right way, with right level of grace and kindness factors into problems solved vs not solved. As someone that likes tech, I want others problems solved as long as their problems solved does not equate to others hurt or with more problems.
My Tech Blog 