If I take a landmark, an area in the city, and I imagine a kitten walking on the ground close to the crowd, when I visit that landmark again, I might remember a kitten that walked there. Imagination factors into memory and potential for truth obfuscated.
If I take a landmark, an area in the city, and I imagine a tiger walking on the ground close to the crowd, it changes the dynamic dramatically – Tigers are dangerous, can’t have a tiger close to the crowd. Tigers might be endangered, shoot an endangered animal? Or maybe I imagine a circus tiger, trained to be like an attack dog that protects me. Regardless of how I imagine things, it could factor into my memory of the landmark, perception of truth, perception of potential threats at a particular landmark.
Not real factors into perception, perception of truth, capacity to comprehend, details that factor into threats perceived or not perceived accurately.
If people see Authority, or an Officer as a kitten, or as a tiger, claim either is good? People use similar not exact systems to amplify comprehension, dehumanization amplifies less than ideally – people are not animals, yet in some prisons in the World conditions have potential to convolute that idea.
Imagination has potential for useful for hypotheticals, what would one do if there was a kitten in the crowd, what would one do if there was a tiger in the crowd (Zoos sometimes have animals, not people escape). Having a plan for potential escaped animals might be useful for cops, reminders of the idea every time they visit a landmark might be less than ideal. Trying to listen to a dispute, citizens communicate and seeing a tiger in their peripheral vision could be less than ideal.
Authority having some imagination matters, thinking things have the potential for only happening one way is not always sufficient citizens protected. A child or an adult could use imagination telling a cop that someone released a tiger into the crowd when they might have been confusing a memory they had of the circus.
Levels and balance matters, wouldn’t want people seeing a circus at every landmark. Capacity to control imagination might be greater in some than others is likely not fully appreciated. I like Imagination – great Writing, great Songs, great Art, and great Movies, that said I do theorize there is the potential for problems, potential for problems I don’t fully know, perceive, or comprehend. Inception is a pretty amazing Movie, also a pretty powerful Movie – that said it was not blocked from the public, for better and worse. Less than ideal truth is in by design yet desire to factor in that fact is potentially less than sufficient at times.
Authority and Cops might not always have ideal access to truth. Less proximity (like being on a boat in the Ocean) might be higher value at times than all fully appreciate. Governments never mislead? Always easy to know, always easy to have access to know when Governments are mislead? Access to oversight is valuable, yet likely distributes knowledge, allows for transparency less than ideally – I have capacity to comprehend threats in society might be thought to known capacity to comprehend is far less than ideal not a given. Having a stable government and society might spoil into thinking it is a given, does not need to be fought for and protected, justice is just in by design and injustice never a problem.
Things are the way they are because God wants them that way thought to change, progress is desirable though change and progress do not always protect all parties. Change and progress, inspired correctly not always a simple system. USA political system constantly changes, leaves change in by design, which is less than all value out for training people to create change and progress in more valuable ways. Practice with Change and Progress factors into better Delivery, delivery of Change and Progress that hurts less and helps more. Being on a boat might limit capacity to interact with the system in a way that protects others, a satellite phone plus distance might be less than all support reduced. Seeing as boats for all to avoid a corrupt system is impractical, better to have a stable non-corrupted system.
Risk mitigation matters, reduced proximity factors into risk mitigation might not always be entertained as an option. Unwise to act on fear, might be comprehended as acting on fear, does not equate to reduced proximity is always value out, should be equated to most value out. That is acting on fear has the potential to be turned up in a way that could reduce risk mitigation. Might be turned up in similar not exact systems in ways that could be allot of value out, thus potentially not always stated. Stand by a defendant, the accused to help protect them, or reduced proximity is higher value added? Standing by one defendant might lead to less capacity to stand by another defendant, likely not fully appreciated people have to choose their battles and more helping protect and defend far from all value out.
Christ has ideal capacity to stand next to people and man that is not God does not have ideal capacity to stand next to all people on Earth and on Space Stations at all times. If I am trying to amplify defense law in Dallas, TX I want God protecting people on the Space Stations? Yes. Desire to cover all bases does not equate to requirement to feels good. Houston is close, yet Space Stations everyone in the World’s neighbor?
I would not want psychopaths or murders walking the streets. That said in The Middle East my understanding is they hang people from cranes – gives feeling of system as more of a Tiger than a kitten. Texas government has used the electric chair, and lethal injection – which gives a feeling of more Tiger than I might like to admit. Dehumanization turned up matters, yet we put people to sleep like animals feels ideal?
I am not authority, that said I want all citizens protected, authority and non-authority, less proximity to dehumanization, dehumanizing systems not always value out.
My Tech Blog 