There is injustice in society. I don’t know how to stop all of it. That should not be equated to I want injustice.
There is ambiguity at times in government messages. I don’t know how to stop all of it. That should not be equated to I want ambiguity in government messages.
Things have potential to be perceived and comprehended in ways not intended. I don’t know how to stop all of it. That should not be equated to I want things perceived and comprehended incorrectly. Sometimes might work in my favor, sometimes might be creative, does not equate to I desire it or it will or is likely to always amplify that way.
Less than ideals factor into people’s profit in life. People don’t know how to stop all of it. That should not be equated to they want less than ideals factoring into profit. If I buy gas I might need it to go to the store or to work, or even to buy solar panels. CO2 emissions contribute to global warming does not equate to I or others desire global warming. Continued use of gasoline by Police Cars and Ambulances – both of which save lives, might fuel less energy independence, continued reliance on The Middle East, that said Police and Ambulances should not be equated to desiring global warming, desire energy dependence that empowers less than ideal regimes.
Awareness is raised less than ideally. Awareness raised less than ideally should not be equated to desire. Raising awareness in the right ways, in the way that actually leads to change requires building bridges over demonizing, demoralizing, and discouraging people that might see things another way. I desire more green tech, more energy independence for our country, and less global warming, I might not know how to raise awareness in ideal ways, should not be equated to I desire to discourage others.
New technology does not always deliver. Selling people on the gains matters and has shown precedent at times for amplifying less than ideally for all in society. Supercomputers have been in by design for a while, Homelessness and People on the street have been in by design regardless that Supercomputers have been in by design – what is sold as has potential to make all peoples lives better sometimes only delivers for a portion of Society. Inclusive path forward Matters, and has shown precedent for turned up less than ideally. Green and Less Global Warming should profit all, making implementation desirable and practical factors into real gains.
More Energy independence could equate to less desirable GDPs for some nations which is less than desirable. I want Venezuelan people less oppressed not more poor – though financial power generated via petroleum has not always amplified less oppression ideally. Paths forward that sound good, that are desirable from an environmental standpoint, do not always require less change for those that are hurting.
Reduced Energy dependence equates to less leverage for other countries on The World Stage, combined with Governmental instability compounded by reduced financial power has shown historic precedent for amplifying less than ideally. Is the United Nations and The World prepared for the costs associated with reduce dependence on oil? People (including me) desire Less Global Warming yet I am not sure practically People of The World (including me) are ready to make sure it amplifies ideally for all nations it will affect. Looking at The Middle East, partially idealed seems to be delivering less than sufficiently. True cost of change without Humanitarian crises?
My Tech Blog 