A few things to consider:
- I think Anger Management is Important
- I think tests associated with Anger Management are Important
- I think tests associated with Anger Management are far from
- Always value added
- Gauged and Delivered correctly
- Have the potential to compound with real life tests in non ideal ways, 1 test is one thing an extra test on top of 100 others could likely be high value out in not fully appreciated ways
- I just listened to a YouTube video that I thought was valuable that talked about replacing angry thoughts with better thoughts of helping others and changing expectation and feeling of privilege. I think the video was valuable and useful though most anger management videos don’t always discuss that less tests from society have the potential to be value added in not fully appreciated ways at times. Many talk about changing personal expectations, yet the idea that personal expectations are always unreasonable seems potentially reduced value as well.
Being cut off while driving likely is a good anger management test, being cut off 10 times in a row likely could exponentially increase potential dangers for traffic whether the person that was tested had an angry outburst or not. Anger Management is a tool in an arsenal of tools to create a safer and more friendly society, yet out of balance could likely be disastrous in not fully appreciated ways.
Zero Tests is far from all value added. If someone is never tested then gets a funny look from someone else they might fly off the rails. One would venture to say that person might need or find Anger Management useful.
Anger Management Tests are useful for helping make society better and people always getting their way could reinforce privilege in non ideal ways has potential to lead to reasoning that people should or can be always tested, and never get their way – and that is the highest value added to society.
That is not the highest value added to society. If I search for something and I get the top search result, I am getting my way. By the logic of negate privilege and increase Anger Management tests one would say never give people the top results, punk them, give them bad results. If I was searching for a Safety video on Electricity that could lead to fatal misinformation and loss of information.
Results Matter and Tests in Balance Matter and Negate they are always ideally turned up. More Tests has potential to save lives, and less tests has the potential to save lives. People never getting their way ever is a very bad idea, use a credit card – never works, try to open a car and key never works is dangerous, and I have seen some of the danger first hand in my life.
I have seen first hand tests misused – of course maybe they were systemic problems, not meant as direct tests. Another problem with Anger Management testing is it is not always easy to differentiate tests and testers from the rest of the population meaning the test have the potential to misdirect anger in less than sufficient ways.
A boxer likely has many Anger Management tests in the ring. A football player likely has many Anger Management test on the field. Testing outside of a ring, without a field, outside of a known setting has potential for problematic when extended to excess. Given that Artificial Intelligence is becoming more common place, we all might venture to consider limiting potential tests turned up as useful by Artificial Intelligence in advance, at least outside of a field, outside of a ring. Getting hit nonstop, getting tackled nonstop outside of a ring, outside of the field by super intelligence Exascale level computing seems like it could be problematic in not fully appreciated ways. Projections, Graphs, and Charts that could ruin lives, ruin careers are likely not only possible have potential for becoming common place if not addressed early and often.
A system with trillions of calculations per second plus and the combined knowledge of all encyclopedias and medical knowledge on the brain couldn’t misuse temporal and spatial summation of neurons in less than sufficient ways? People tested to excess seen as useful to less useful has potential to be allot of value added.
The Don’t Judge part of The Bible is likely to become more important as time progresses further. We are increasing potential exponentially yet we are not increasing oversight at the same rate, thus the system is non-deterministic. More Breakthroughs possible likely mean most people might not be able to know all the way things can happen or be amplified. Breakthroughs that can change the World for better or worse can happen each and everyday, and nobody likely has full comprehension of everything being created, or every path of thought that has the potential to be evoked.
There are likely many systems that have been created and have yet to be created that both pose some of the similar good qualities and problems that Artificial Intelligence has the potential to bring. I think addressing Artificial Intelligence is important, that said just addressing Artificial Intelligence is not enough to tackle all potential systemic changes and additions. Relabeling to escape regulation might be a potential problem.
My Tech Blog 