People like to understand why things happen the way they do. It is easy to upsell knowledge to more valuable than zero surface area, no knowledge. Once one opens a door it is not always easily shut. Evidence that is considered has the potential for hard to divest from. Less knowledge has potential to be more, and evidence that factors into true understanding is not always invested in with good reason.
People are likely to know how which doors they open and which doors they do not will factor into future comprehension, thought, and decision making? No. It would be nice to think all comprehension is value added.
One might think it is wise to learn about how someone turns into a Tyrant so they do not turn into one themselves. Then they learn about Caesar and profit imperialism brought to The Roman Empire. History might acknowledge the brutality against civilizations and slaves, yet the Pantheon and Colloseum stand 2000 years later. History allows Throughput gains based upon imperalism to remain intact 2000 years later teaches a lesson to the World, gains made through less than ideal methods live in infamy, are never truly justified and corrected, and will likely not be until the end of the Earth.
Learning wrongs are not justified by mankind, civilization has tendency to not correct things over time has potential for thoughts about will civilization give one a fair deal or not. Surface area given is less than ideal, No Surface Area, Zero Surface Area has potential for things amplifying behind the scenes. As far as I can tell surface area given or not given Wars, Genocide, Evil, and Brutality continue to exist.
Knowledge is Power, Power has greater than zero potential to corrupt. Having checks and balances in place to prevent misuse of power has had a tendency for less than ideal amplification over time. Some with Zero Surface Area might have higher value added to life and society than more than Zero Surface Area in certain cases. Just because knowledge exists does not equal all have the potential to comprehend and use that knowledge wisely, not to max profit, not at other’s expense. Certain sets of knowledge might be more destructive in combination, though it is unlikely for many to know what those sets are, or to be able to prevent others from gaining the combination of knowledge from multiple sets. People that warn, or try to prevent the wrong combinations are few, and have far less than ideal visibility in this World. Obfuscation and Reduced Visibility, Reduced Time to converse, Reduce Ability to Converse factors into potential for non ideal combinations. Something that can cause problems that can’t be talked about is a possible system, likely not always fully pondered and factors into limited justice amplification.
There is real risk that has high potential for not always talked about and that factors into both greater and reduced risk mitigation. Reliance on God for Risks that can’t be seen is a bit of a requirement, and being an imperfect human ability to see, and thus perceive and comprehend risk is unlikely to amplify ideally for self. If Risk is obfuscated for self by default, unwise to think proper level of warnings are sufficiently amplified by default.
Negate life, even if 100 years is ideal time to fully know, see, comprehend, and appreciate all risks involved in life, or even full potential of a smaller subset of risks. Everything goes well can lull people into a false sense of security, thought that no risk exists that can lead to non ideal risks taken like not being safe around high voltage, drinking and driving, or driving tired. Avoiding driving tired has potential for easier in good times and might not amplify ideal risk mitigation in tough times with reduced access to food, health, and time.
People become reliant upon greater throughput that has potential for reduced in non ideal ways in unpredictable ways at non ideal unpredictable times. People that have a car working are always more likely to survive the storms in life? Maybe not. No car has potential for leading to unable to get to a hospital at a critical time, also has potential for not leading to a crash that could take life. Having the option available to drive is nice, has potential for less than ideal reliance in certain cases. Oppression in changes dynamics around cars and not having cars, and knowing ideally seems less likely.
Having a car and transportation in society gets upsold to a necessity, potentially in ways that when amplified over the public at large are likely to produce accidents. A society that always promotes cars and profit, increased throughput with some deaths known in by design, not always talked about is unlikely to talk about other options with reduced risk mitigation always. Not driving at night close to bars has potential for higher value added than police that do their best but have high potential for amplifying less than ideally based upon obfuscated comprehension and not always ideal support.
Reducing probablities does not set them to zero. Society likes to drive a hard line between people that drive by default and those that drive tired or on a cell phone. Yet people driving by default generally know there is a chance, there is probabilities increased for having an accident for self and others. That mentality amplified over the public at large factors into less than ideal decision making taught as useful for increased throughput. The combination of training factors into how people decide with reduced cognitive ability, like when tired, or stressed.
What we turn up in society as should be valued, as matters factors into greater or lesser probabilities over time. Less probabilities does not equal zero probabilities might be upsold to investment is useless, but less probabilities has the potential to save lives, should give more oxygen in the room for more grace and forgiveness for those that do make mistakes though that is not what I have really come to know society for. Bad Decision making, Prioritization, and What to Value is turned up in society yet we punish a few in less than sufficient ways. Just be silent and not inclusive is not sufficient value added. That person that is left in silence might be the one amplifying messages on High Voltage Safety, and they might just give up, think their value doesn’t really matter in the grand scheme of things. Reduced Encouragement factors into Reduced Throughput of Lives Saved to Better a bit of a meaningful challenge for the World.
My Tech Blog 