Time Management Critical Thinking

What people maximize throughput of time for matters.

Balance matters and is not always ideally turned up. One could maximize time throughput for more fun, yet that might not be all work and rest added. One could maximize time throughput for more work, yet that might not be all fun and rest added. One could maximize time throughput for more learning, yet that might not be all fun, work, and rest added. What people factor into balance matters, and balance set to easy to get right is not all true value added.

Times and Environmental conditions factor into prioritization and balance. Natural Disasters equal potentially less time for rest and learning, more learning in advance, rested in advance has potential for power likely not always full comprehended. Preparations matter and curveballs like peace to wartime are possible, like no natural disasters to flood, droughts, and tornadoes are possible.

Too much prioritization has potential to waste time.

Less adatable plans have potential for less than ideal reduced momentum in wrong directions.

Factoring in New Data is valuable for Time Management. Factoring in New Data is not always currently available and people do not always like waiting for newer, fresher data. Desire to move forward has potential for not always ideal forward momentum created.

If one thinks every task is of type A or B. Known data factors into categories, and thus classification of each tasks. If one finds a task does not fit into categories A or B, that a new category C is needed people and systems might not always ideally factor in different. Changes required to the system to better describe data are not always made, are not always invested in. Change sometimes requires time and resources that people, groups, or systems do not always have. Complexity is reduced via Simplification does not equal Simplification is ideally done, or is zero cost, unconsequential.

Investing in a processes, systems, and idea of thoughts that are flexible, changeable, and adaptable have potential for being value added and less than ideal value added. Rigid properties might equal more reliable. People like bridges they can walk on. People like comparing ideas, concepts, systems, and practices to like a bridge potentially in less-than-ideal ways. Bridges subject to fast changes, not the same tomorrow as today seems less than ideal, yet systems and ideas that are thought of as bridge like would be potentially considered less valuable if not adaptable, if not subject to change. Technology is like a bridge, that constantly changes, might be less than ideal comprehension amplified.

Reliability and Maintenance invested in advance does not always lead to More Reliability and Maintenance. Reliability and Maintenance invested in advance usually has the potential to equal less time costs. If you see a tire that needs to be replaced potential for saved from a crash that could cost allot of time and potentially health problems that are also less than ideal time losses reduced.

People considering getting a car might not always think about time losses that amplify via required maintenance. Oppression has potential to make maintenance and supported right a less possible system. Time costs upfront, time costs like investing in reduced oppression, like investing in better maintenance has potential to be allot of time savings. Investing in less to maintain in advance has the potential to be value added, potentially less than ideal value added. Maintenance, maintenance task performed consistently factors into ability to maintain in the future. More practice maintaining is not all reduced ability to maintain in the future.

Working out today, going for a walk today is potentially costly to time. Yet more steps today factor into health and energy tomorrow, that might equal more empowered time. When someone is 80 years old if they were a millionaire, how much might they pay to their 20-year-old self to start walking 10,000 more steps a day? We have the potential today to invest in a potential better health version of us later, in the years where every bit helps. No guarantee one will live to 80, walking could equal getting hit by a car. Living in fear of rare cases might be less than ideal life lived, might be less than ideal health amplified, might be less than ideal practice dealing with traffic and busy streets that have the potential to factor into future throughput. Best known choices are not always zero risk. Low risk equated to zero risk might be less than ideal risk mitigated.

Some thoughts listening to

---

Reminder I am the writer of this vlog, not the person on this video.

On a different note, I just used a bit of V8 low sodium with my ramen noodles instead of the salt packet. Salt factors into hypertension (high blood pressure) from what I understand and thus finding ways to decrease salt intake not always a given. Ramen with salt and V8 separate might equal more total salt intake then mixing together. More healthy options with less salt not always available, all options available not always known or thought of in advance.

Microwaved together tastes a bit like Spanish Rice. V8 is high in potassium, like two glasses of Orange juice if I remember correctly. I have been in the Emergency Room and they have given me potassium tablets, low potassium has potential to cause problems.