20 More years of training, innovation, resolution increases in various lights and potentially history obfuscated from the sands of time might deliver a better document than they following? Yes. Easy to upsell current comprehension to be sufficient to write a document, to say everything needed to be said and refrain from saying anything that could cause problems for others. Not sure that would be adequate, this document is some level of support, has to be used in the right ways to actually be support ive, and is far from ideal, might need editing and might have not thought about all significant combinations.
Support Matters, and we don’t know always what we are supporting on the short term, mid term, or long term. Supporting others with food and medical services, housing is an investment in faith. Others that are supported have the potential to go on to do great things and terrible things.
People have ideal comprehension of what or who they are supporting? No. People make decisions on vastly limited resolution and vastly limited knowledge. What appears to be the right choice to some might not be the wise choice for all. People’s brains are wired differently and raising comprehension on reasoning takes time, takes time that is not always delivered. Iffy systems are in by design, avoiding iffy systems might not be all protection for parties that are involved in iffy systems. Investing in iffy systems might not be all protection for people that clearly choose a side that is more pronounced and less iffy.
Both sides set to valued sufficiently is unwise. What is said and what is delivered is many times different. People don’t always have to say something to create momentum in non ideal directions. Intentions can be inferred or implied, projected in ways that not all people comprehend. Iffy does not amp ideally, and people don’t amp ideally, specially with iffy systems. Summation takes time, more complexity does not always equal less need for increased time processing. Making decisions quickly is not all good, deferred decision making is not all good. Combined elements can lead to value added and subtracted, properties that are unlikely to reduce complexity, always make assessment simpler.
Provide harbor to a military that hurts others? Support equals zero responsibility? Equals full responsibility? People pay taxes, people don’t always have a sufficient voice to combat oppression. People don’t always have sufficient comprehension oppression is happening, or even possible. What actually amps and what does not amp are vastly different systems. Paying taxes is an investment in Faith, and investment in Faith that has a precedent for being abused on more than one occasion in the past. All Roman citizens were happy their taxes were being used for crucifixion? Easy to fight paying taxes in Ancient Rome?
Avoiding oppression is harder than people fully appreciate, has momentum people don’t always fully appreciate, makes action, choice and wrong based on visibility and resolution that is far less than ideal at times. Fight something when you know only 75% of the problem? Not fight something when you only know 75% of the problem? Equate decisions made based on 75% knowledge to ideal on either side? Decisions are made without fully comprehension of possible results, does not equate to always fair, and not appreciating that life is not always fair would be unwise. Less than ideal decision making factors into assessment, and assessment gets confused with judgment. Don’t judge is wise, yet we are required to make assessments on a day to day basis.
My thoughts are based upon reports I hear that are chosen via bias, bias my sources are sufficient my interest and choices are sufficient. My thoughts do not, should not be consider to amp ideally for all. I provide support and words as an act of faith based on far less than always sufficient at times resolution and knowledge. I know 2+2=4 yet in the right circumstances I might be better looked at like someone that does not know, more of a 2+2=? so to speak, not dumb just inadequate insufficient knowledge, the two are different.
Truth is not always appreciated. What is truth is up to debate at times. Truth that is not always appreciated provided is not always higher value added. Truth and Opinion has the potential for being mixed. The Bible is upsold to truth. Do not murder is upsold to Truth, and I am glad it is. The truth has complexities, just like a light switch is on or off has potential for complexities. Truth is based on perception, if a light is on, then it is assumed the light switch is on, yet there are possibilities that have the potential for making that not true, the circuit could be cut, provided by another circuit. Words said confidently with reason are not all opinion are not all truth. Just an opinion the light switch is on? Just an opinion factors into valued or not valued, people want High Voltage to be comprehended as dangerous, set it to just an opinion? Not all wisdom added.
My Tech Blog 