Dignity

Current system is take dignity, take power, then expect ideal results.

Eliminates conversation. Make access to knowledge about what choices are right and wrong iffy. If you get A right, blames for B, if you get B right blames for A. Blame factors into max profit, in to equitable relief.

A system of Oppression profits at my and others’ expense. One could make the argument that any that profit from proceeds equal indebted to those that are oppressed by that same system. One could also make the argument that is just how the chips fall, profiting from an oppressive system does not always equal indebted to those it oppresses. Potentially unwise to turn up any that profit from an oppressive system are in debt, as the World, Humanity is an oppressive system. Golden Rule would deliver otherwise. If a system profits while a few are oppressed and wrongly imprisoned in Jail, then the system, the people that profit from that system owe them.

Making things right by people is not always easy, and is thus not always invested in. Making things right is sometimes, many times disregarded for the sake of throughput, they were oppressed equals yesterdays news. Calling out wrongs immediately, in a timely manner factors into ability to actually guage wrongs and thus factor into correctness of justice and judgments. If correctness of justice and judgments is called into question those wrongs can be deferred in a limited resource justice system for cases and problems that are more easily judgeable or at least give the appearance of better results for money and resources invested.

Not commiting wrongs against others is high value added. Trying to add flex and cushion in for a system that amps far less than ideally creates value in not fully appreciated ways. Settling wrongs quickly with real conversation is higher value added in many cases (some cases, many cases people aren’t equipped to discuss wrongs in just way on their own) and far from always invested in. Thus walking a safer line might appear more costly than it is. Being divested, such as deciding to not go to a party, not going out on iffy nights has potential for a lot of value added not always fully reliazable. If I don’t go to a dangerous party I might theorize about what might have happened if I did go. If I don’t come home from a dangerous party, won’t be much processing power to theorize about. Easy to think self always equals high value output low problem input, realization that even self has potential to perpetuate or create cascades or catalysts of events is not always fully pondered.

Less is upsold to less, when sometimes less is allot more.