People write with the idea ideal perception and comprehension is possible. If one thinks the way others will read something will lead to problems, perceived and comprehended and detrimental lights, in ways other than originally intended there is a high potential for desiring to write less.
People are different. We write as though we are writing to someone with similar comprehension levels of ourselves, with a similar past with similar historic precedent and categorization and classification. If I write to someone thinking they will perceive the word Circle as no corners and the word Square as four corners, we build on a common understanding. Circle and Square are basic examples, but there are many other norms that have historic precedent set that we rely upon. What is Right and Wrong, what is Biased, what is not Biased. It is easy to think self has ideal capacity to see clearly, to see all things needed to judge Right, Wrong, Bias, vs Not Biased in ideal ways.
Self-experiences a small set of the experience’s others are going through every day. 8 billion people on Earth equals 8 billion Unique experiences all being compounded by increases of technology and a knowledge base over time. Imagine the day before the filament for a light bulb was discovered. Imagine the day after the filament for a light bulb was discovered. The World likely looked much of the same to most parties involved yet it was changed in a dramatic way that catalyzed events and progress never known as possible.
Being in the know is valuable, and with 8 billion people that is allot of out of in the know. People in the past likely have thought they have seen it all, won’t see any new experiences before they die. The system, life is upsold to static comprehension. Yet make no mistake, each new day can surprise you, the system is dynamic.
The was a day before antibiotics and a day after antibiotics. Infections never lead to hallucinations? Rates of hallucinations, those that experience hallucinations in society have the potential to be reduced in dramatic ways while not eliminating the possibility all together. More of a statistical anomaly can equal more likely to factor out as a possibility. Factored out as a possibility does not equal guaranteed to not be a cause.
What is factored in is rounded at times for the sake of throughput. You know 3, it is the number 3. Rounding is no big deal if the actual value is 3.14? Rounded values factor into judgment, right and wrong, biased versus not biased perception. Perception has potential for easily upsold to ideal comprehension, especially in iffy times.
Fighting for survival such as in the case of Health problems equals less potential, less likely to be able to fully differentiate between numbers and rounded numbers for truth, between 3 and 3.14. Numbers and judgment get rounded under pressure for greater throughput, not always in truthful ways, not always in ways that lead to ideal forward momentum for truth.
Rounding that is useful for increased throughput has the potential for turned up as relied upon in tough times has the potential for amping less than sufficiently for all parties, especially in a max profit system. The rounding in the system causes zero problems for people? Might think again.
Do not have the Energy to judge with sufficient resolution is a possible system. Truth obfuscated, Resolution Limited, Relevance limited, Max Profit, and Profit factor into message delivered or not delivered on any given day, on lessons and warnings delivered or not delivered on any given day.
People that think they have been given ideal clarity and resolution from God to decipher situations correctly factor into Judgments delivered or not delivered on any given day. Iffy judgments have the sake of being upsold to ideal in the name of Religion and sake of Greater Throughput on any given day.
8 billion people, given same information and same experiences I might have made similar decisions? Easy to think self or one would make better decisions given limited data. Increased data, increase comprehension is useful, necessary to make ideal judgments does not equal it is close to always delivered.
If I wanted to stop terrible things from happening in the future, I might limit the awful experiences that could be used to catalyze awful events. That said sufficient data about awful experiences is not sufficiently provided on the common. More knowledge does not always drive less of more of the same. Less knowledge does not always lead to better outcomes, more knowledge does not always lead to better outcomes. The idea is more information and knowledge will drive better results. Many times, that is the case, it is far from a guarantee, and has tendency and historic precedent for being upsold to sufficient to project in ideal ways that have shown precedent for not always delivering in ideal ways.
If I catalyze someone to the importance of the Drug War, Cartels, and iffy authority in the USA and Mexico. Will it lead to more potential for value added to the World, or another body bag with potential taken before their prime? Researcher that could cure cancer is killed by a stray bullet? Not possible?
Knowing the level of a problem can lead to weight of desire to get involved. Getting involved is usually a system with less-than-ideal resolution that has the potential to amplify in both ideal and less than sufficient ways at times.
God allows Evil to exist in the World. God allows Limited Comprehension, Knowledge, and Obfuscation as In By Design, In By Default. Set level of Evil currently in the World to upsold to known? God of doesn’t prevent Gas Chambers, doesn’t prevent Mothers dying in childbirth by default gets upsold to will always prevent stray bullets? What is allowed and is not allowed, what is possible has the potential for upsold to known less than sufficiently.
Evil is In By Design, In By Default, Insufficient Beginning Definite? IBD?
Iodine Beats Deficiency, too much iodine not a good thing
Installed By Default, Instigated By Definition?
Clear Number System or Central Nervous System? Both increase value?
My Tech Blog 