People tend to split hairs over the money vs love of money as evil.
I am thinking more in just terms of money.
If 20 people that are arguing each have 1 million dollars. They likely might not have to work much. A lot of free time on people’s hands can be used wisely, is not always used wisely. When you aren’t dealing with your own problems, trying to deal with the problems of the day it might give more time to concentrate on past wrongs, concentrate in a way that might not be all evil out.
Less resources has the potential to cause problems too. Having a million dollars can lead to inflated sense of self worth. People with greater amount of resources are treated nicer, given better treatment. This can lead to feeling of entitled, can lead to one thinking their life more valuable than another. Guy having a heart attack in a Penthouse Apartment or a guy having a heart attack that looks like a bum with no money, potentially a drug addict that has been seen without funds and resources for weeks in the park? Where will the careflight be sent to? Problems like this never arise? Who will actually pay their medical bills doesn’t ever factor into who lives and who dies?
Money, just having money, despite loving it or not loving it can lead to better luck in some situations, and that better luck can be upsold to a given, deserved, a default. Privileges gained are not always free of belief privileges are by default. One that leads and delegates has higher potential for delegating to others in different situations, situations where they are not the leader. Leadership qualities, delegation is easy to turn on and off like a light switch is likely to deliver less than sufficiently at times. People are trained ways to speak, ways to interact in management and leadership that become second nature and thus not always easy to even notice one is doing. Same advice that factors into Confidence can be perceived as demanding, capitalizing on right, silencing other voices in the room. Confident people are not always appreciated and people that are not confident are not always appreciated. Life delivers fair value on that is not really true value added.
I have a mind. I am trained with a certain amount of schooling. I have the ability to use reason and logic. I am required to infer meaning at many points in life thus it is easy to do, easy to do in non ideal ways. I am not trained in all fields, thus the way I think of something can be much different than the way someone else thinks of something, communicates about something. Imagine an artist is going bankrupt in the city, their experience is unique to them being an artist and is relatable because going bankrupt is scary. Imagine an Economist is going bankrupt in the city, their experience is unique to them being an Economist and is relatable because going bankrupt is scary. The experience has the potential to change both in vastly different ways, ways that are far from all value added. It is easy to theorize or postulate about how someone with different training might take or work against bad news, yet people comprehend problems in different ways and solve problems in different ways.
I have a tendency to think my way of thinking about things is the right way to think about things, the only way to think about things, if there is another way, a better way to think about things God would have let me know. We are required to act on Faith at times given unknowns. Upsold to ideal value when having unknowns because of have to act on unknowns seems unwise. God makes training and teachers important. I have not been trained or taught by all that have the potential to add value. Upsell my current way of thinking about things, my current comprehension to ideal is generally more of a requirement of confidence and faith than establishing true value. There is a requirement to act on Faith at times, take for instance a High Voltage Sign. I can’t always see two pieces of metal that if are touched could be fatal. I have to work in confidence and rely on the training that I have to say if there is a High Voltage sign, there is a potential of death, potential that is worthy of warning others about. Someone that knows better might know a circuit is low voltage, might be able to check with an Amp Meter, might know the circuit has been locked off in another place. Tough times can lead to people having to act upon limited knowledge about dangers that exists and do not exist. Doing the right thing does not always equal ideal resolution. The combination could easily be upsold to choices that one given better training and more information would not make, would know not to make.
I have added words here I think are valuable. Do not upsell them to the only words that are valuable. Do not upsell the way I think of things to be the only way that is valuable, that is the way with the most potential for value. Trying to add value does not, never did equal ideal capacity to add value. Problems are many times fixed with the best solutions at the time. How the same problem will be fixed 10 years, 20 years from now? Might be better, might be worse without investment.
My last paragraph has the potential to sound less confident. Many times won’t be added by writers, yet likely should be in most if not all cases. For the sake of confidence and message valued people and writers incur responsibility and liability potentially while not actually incurring responsibility. The book of a dead man can’t be sued. Yet his family might be able to be? Kind of how the World seems to work at times.
Too high of cost for delivering Warnings, like High Voltage has the potential for less Warnings delivered. Less Warnings, Less need to sound confident might be less lawsuits. All Warnings are thus not invested in, as sounding confident sometimes has a cost. A society of “no good deed goes unpunished” is likely to wind up with extra dangers.
A society that makes cost of real conversation too high based upon Public Image is destined for problems. Real conversation could lead to progress, reduces problems. Yet if that is what people wanted, that is what they would invest in.
If conversation is being limited based upon Image, then there are likely dangers that are not being fully versed and younger people are not always aware of this. If I am young and here gossip there might be drugs at a party, do I put my public image on the line based upon gossip potentially endangering the image of all those at the party? Now consider cocaine might be at the party and someone you know has a heart murmur, say something or not say something? People don’t always talk about their heart murmurs, people don’t always talk about dangers for edge cases. Bad men might constantly fail to deliver, does not equal a good man with his image on the line will always deliver either. The idea people are good, you will know when there is dangers, think better of others amps less than sufficiently.
Judgment equals sin “do not judge”, one that judges is a bad man? People are not perfect, people do not amp close to perfection, people amp reliance on less than close to perfection upsold to perfection. Everyone as a good man that relies on a body that is not trained perfectly, that has far less than ideal resources and nutrition at times that cannot always be readily seen? Maybe saying someone is good or bad is a judgment in itself? Saying someone good as sinful as saying they are bad?
Will there be good people or bad people at the party? Will I have to worry about drugs there?
People that give an answer will be sinning?
Treat others as you wish to be treaded, Golden Rule, combined with Don’t Judge and Situations that are Critical and Require Assessment?
Problem with drugs is those that use them get attached to dealers, dealers to cartels. Useful proximity has the potential for being upsold to useful at present time or at a future date. That is not always versed or talked about. People are told to trust God and not to worry yet that seems to amp less than sufficiently at times. Legalist might say “they were going to a party that is out of God’s control, they wanted to be around drinking thus they know what they are getting into”. Off the hook for having to warn people has potential for common, considered useful at times, all people that might have had a voice to warn might have been told repeatedly to turn down the warning, the warning is not appreciated.
And don’t forget the power of an over zealous white horse trying to use situations to paint pictures about right and wrong, to teach a lesson.
The guy that says something and is not appreciated? I can relate. Potential for silencing overtime is not always pondered by society. Society does not right the past, does not right the wrongs of the past, does not equal society won’t test you in the future (will they speak up when it counts?). Combination is Jading. Combination has high potential to lead to some deciding to no longer take on tasks with greater liability, to no longer have the capacity or health to take on tasks with greater liability.
Kind of gives bad feeling of everyone’s life as a potential time bomb that will go off when they have to blow the whistle on something, losing everything including image in the process just to do the right thing. People make financial decisions based upon new salaries; do they always consider they might have to blow the whistle on something 2 weeks in?
The combination kind of gives feeling God does not really desire me and my family to be successful. Reduced self-worth and resources are zero cost to family is not really true value added. Your family going bankrupt is not in anyone’s best interest and is not always fully talked about in the World.
My Tech Blog 