Humanization

Dehumanization is all too common. People are forced into groupings Republicans and Democrats, those groupings are associated with animals Elephants and Donkeys. Combination not all Humanization amped, combination not all fair amped.

People dress up like cats on Halloween gets upsold to treating them like animals all year round becomes kosher?

Humanization protected get set to easy, it is not easy. Less Oppression gets set to easy, it is not easy. Both are adequate throughput in 2023? No.

Easy to get wrapped up in non ideally. The receiver is fast as a Cheetah can be thought of as a complement, yet has potential to reinforce less that sufficient dehumanization, more associations with animals on the conscious and subconscious levels that factor into and facilitate biases.

Animals are powerful sometimes. Animals are unpredictable sometimes. Someone that is powerful and unpredictable might be upsold to less human and that is not ideal value established.

Lots of advances in Supercomputing and Quantum Computing yet dehumanization and insufficient clean water World Wide is still a problem in 2023. Given the gains we have made in Computing, Big Data, AI, Supercomputing, Space, Manufacturing, and Throughput seems like gains should be much greater. Gives feeling of dehumanization, reduced Throughput might be IBD In By Design. Like cars that consume less fuel, more efficient solar panels that are known yet get blocked. More effective solutions do not always generate greater profit.

Maintenance systems factor into designs, important to consider. If someone creates a solar panel array that will last 50 years without needing to be serviced, will anyone know how to fix it or replace it in 50 years? Future never turns up non ideal reliance on less than ideal, less than sufficient infrastructure due to cut costs, to maximize profits?

Can make money off a system factors into systems that are amped versus not amped. Might be worthy of pondering. Investing, Investment in products are either you decide to invest or decide not to invest. Investing might have maintenance costs that are IBD In By Design, that end up being claimed as lower initially yet end up costing more later. Choosing not to invest might be the wiser choice at times. Value gained versus Value lost is worthy of critical thought. Heavy (like a desktop computer) can make moving harder, make location set more to constant in potential non ideal ways.

A car has potential to be a similar system. No car has value, a car has value.

A hot tub has potential to be a similar system. No hot tub has value, a hot tub has value. A hot tub is heavy, hard to move, has extra costs. A hot tub can also reduce cortisol and make the World and less mean place. Less mean has value not always pondered.

Hard to be stuck in traffic continuously with no car, unless you have long commutes all day and take the bus or taxis. Traffic can be a lot of anger management tests not all in society get. More tests can be value added, less tests can be more value added, and negate society knows or close to always knows when which one adds more value.

People are conditioned for different levels of stress then put in situations with each other. One type of test can be value added for other types of tests, far from all value added. Learn to block the tests on the right side and get hit from the left, learn to block the test from the front and get hit from the back. Dealing with 20 tests in traffic does not equal prepared to lose job, Losing job does not equal prepared for 20 tests in traffic.

Life tendency to puff me up where I am strong at times then hit me where I am weak. Kind of wish that wasn’t the case, wasn’t the norm. Two options presented on the table, the correct answer was the option taped to the bottom of the table you didn’t see. Kind of how my life feels like it amps. Choose left or choose right, you choose wrong is a possible system, a useful system for maximize profit.

The people giving options always only have best of intentions could wrongly be claimed. Black or White not all color amplified. Red or Blue not sufficient Green Amped.

Grouping is useful for Maximize Profit, negate it is always sufficient value added for the parties being Grouped. A good list of politicians, list of the good politicians made today. Now imagine something bad happens EventA. In the future, who was in charge when EventA happened? See the list of the “Good” politicians.

Could have nothing to do with EventA, could have fought similar systems to EventA 1000 times. Lists and Groups of people always effectively raise Comprehension? No. Grouping is useful for Increased Throughput, reduced costs based on Specific Details. Raising Comprehension takes time, extra time costs are Not All Throughput Amplified.

Negate Raising Comprehension will be adequately amplified and maintained in tough times equals people might not should be trusted with Grouping technology that leads to Throughput gains. Can get away with it leads to does get away with it. Can claim sufficient throughput can lead to gets away with insufficient throughput.

But the Good list is to reward the Politicians that did right. Which Politicians got the extra rewards around time of EventA? There are inefficiencies in the way the public reads, comprehends, and acts upon data and those inefficiencies and inconsistencies can be used by a few to max profit at the cost of many.

People need grouping technology. Sick patients and healthy patients. Already helped and helped. No grouping is unwise. People that like to Max Profit and are subject to sinful thoughts and motivations built on limited knowledge, experience, resolution, and obfuscation do not always use Grouping technology wisely or in the best interest of the public.

Politicians that don’t limit relevance for personal gain, where is that group?

If that group doesn’t exist. Wise to give politicians more access to grouping technologies like who watches what videos, who reads what documents online? Necessary for protection? Or necessary for protecting the bottom line?