Pretty -> Much

Pretty, much

1000 documents to emphasize on

or 1 document to emphasize with

People have potential to take on a lot of complexity in life at times. Our society pretty much revolves around it. Tons of complex classes in college, many times one just trying to get to the next to get the diploma.

Value creation around writing leads to requirement for volume of words. Value creation for typing skills revolves around volume of words. Greater volume is useful is some scenarios can lead to people thinking it is better in all scenarios.

Bigger House equals more space more room to breathe and live potentially less collisions less friction. More space can reduce complexity in some ways while increasing complexity in others like maintenance proximity to be able to hear conversations.

Trying to learn can equal time costs. Learned material can lead to value creation. Quality has potential for high value added and reduced quality can lead to unable to trust, less able to rely upon. Time costs in learning are an investment that usually are likely to create value yet are not always likely to create value.

People might try to over simplify, take on too little at times, that can also amplify the Beauty and Prettiness of Much. Only addition? No subtraction, multiplication, and algebra? A slippery slope to proofs in Numerical Analysis and PhD dissertations in Mathematics?

It is a saying that applies to more than one topic where context matters greatly. Some learning paths for some people could be dangerous. Many learning paths for many people likely have the potential to reduce danger in some but potentially not all cases. Understanding physics could lead to better understanding and ability to react in traffic. Someone that might not know physics might immediately jump to the correct action to take. Knowledge adds complexity, useful complexity potentially not always useful complexity specifically in times that require fast reaction times.

Easily able to categorize and classify via simplification factors into throughput on a common basis. More categories might be available sometimes does not always equate to it is useful to consider the extra cases always. People knowingly choose to reduce Much, reduce complexity in certain cases potentially at the cost of correct decisions, potentially enabling much greater grace than might be available if some other cases were potentially considered.

Lagged Throughput is less useful than faster Throughput, known that many will likely rely upon it versus always considering extra cases that factor into truth might be useful in considering how things are likely to play out in society. Life has potential for less than a fair system, just because something might be classified as legal in a grey area doesn’t mean all will see it that way or society might always have the potential for considering it that way in the future.

Labeled as safe might not always be safe has potential for less useful in societies where people rely upon a safe label. Have to trust things to some level can lead to over reliance on trusting things potentially when a system shifts from stable to unstable at some point in the future. Easy to think stability leads to stability, society as a functional bridge one day will lead to society as a functional bridge tomorrow. Governments and Politicians around the World rely upon the idea stability and order will be maintained and have incentive to control the narrative around it especially in times where stability and resources might be more questionable.

Invested too little might be consider less than appreciated at times as well, dynamics matter in society and are not always easy to gauge. Squeaky clean might not always be appreciated, there might be incentive, potential protection for not looking squeaky clean. Potentially harder with someone who likes to amplify truth in society, does not always know what there is to lose, potentially for thinking can speak freely off top of head without costs and consequences. Society sometimes turns down truth and that is far from zero cost, we need people to provide valuable information that keeps bridges functioning in society. Professionals inspired to provide the right information while holding close other confidential information based upon Non Disclosures has potential for many times amplifying less than sufficiently. Non Disclosures are complexity, are Much, Much that have the potential for being less than sufficient value added at times and that is not always pondered or versed in real ways. Real discussion costly potentially many times divested from in advance.

Potential for a well informed whistleblower to lead to clean water supplies. Potential for a misinformed whistleblower to bankrupt companies potentially companies that create water well drills and clean water supply. People take on jobs and work because they have to pay bills, need a place to live. People don’t always have the ability, or feel they have the ability to easily divest from situations where they might be required to blow the whistle. Tests against Moral Character are stressful, have the potential to put one on the street with insufficient resources, potential for not always versed as the real reason, potential for made out to be crazy and illogical. People have a family to feed, they don’t always have ideal capacity to say shouldn’t have made a family and then I wouldn’t need a job that has potential to test me in complex and excessive ways. Complexity has potential for compounding.

Bar can be set too high, Bar can be set too low, and those that judge the bar are not all human imperfection out, max profit and competition reduced. Judgment by humans is many times less than ideal based upon the desire to improve throughput, potential value added for pondering what complexity we choose to take on in life. Divested has potential for less than all value added as well, less conversation not always more conversation.