At any point on the road from age 0 to age 100 life can change dramatically. It can go from not having to piss and shit attached to medical devices to having to piss and shit attached to medical devices.
Access to mobility can be limited in the future. Less interrupts like pain and health problems are power for Focus, for ability to capitalize on the day in front of you.
It is easy to upsell the future to there will be time for that, time to make gains, time to change the tide.
Systems like temporary are worthy of consideration.
Systems like permanent likely without breakthroughs that might not happen for hundreds of year are worthy of consideration.
I will just work a job I hate for another 5 years can be thought. Yet 5 years might not be guaranteed.
Holding out for a Superbowl win 15 years down the line might not always be the wisest way to look at things.
Proximity to gains is power. Simplicity that requires less maintenance, maintenance that is far from guaranteed is power.
Complexity is amplified without consideration of what there is to gain and what there is to lose at times. Someone that starts a habit of drinking sugary drinks that are acidic can eat away at the teeth. People have a tendency to think the future will have more support not less support than the past, more support for fixing teeth. Support in the Future can, and has had a precedent in my life for being less at times. Less problems with Maintenance is Power, gets upsold to less. Can rust will rust, unlikely to always have capacity to remove rust seems apt.
It is unpleasant to think about a future with potential health problems, with potential problems caused by the manifestation of corruption and oppression that lead to less support and less mobility. Unpleasant to think about does not equal impossible to happen, that history like with WW1 and WW2, Vietnam, and Iraq/Afghanistan has amped over and over.
Mankind paints the Future as Rosey, builds houses, thinks the best, tries to invest here or there without always considering that talks and plans higher up are in the works about War and Peace, Oppression and Less Oppression that are worth being invested in, that are hard to be invested in.
More Positive Paths early on matter dramatically, one thing might not lead to another does not always equal it does not, if the path veers a little off to the right incrementally it is likely to be far off right without people always realizing it. If a path veers a little off to the left incrementally it is likely to be far off to the left without people realizing it. Small choices, small decisions about what are positive paths and what are positive challenges, what is seen as has the potential to lead to Gains and what has the Potential to lead to Losses matters and is not always pondered.
The future does not always provide adequate Grace, Love, Hope, and Mercy for all Paths chosen. It is a real problem, it is a problem worth investing in in advance. We all have a tendency to think our paths are chosen based on great knowledge and refined decision making, yet our paths are chosen based on limited truth, limited data consistency, and limited visibility, obfuscation, and relevance limiting that is compounded by corruption, oppression, competition, and a system based on maximizing profit without full consideration of the costs.
Thus the path we choose can be one that has more adequate Grace, Love, Hope, and Mercy because we chose to invest in it, or can be one that might lead to less than ideal ends that are compounded by our lack of investment in Grace, Love, Hope, and Mercy.
You might not see immediate return on investments for Grace, Love, Hope, and Mercy, for Encouraging someone that might be down on their luck, does not equal those investments will likely be regretted later. Sometimes it takes time for words to work, immediate responses do not always equal full effect. Profound Epiphanies sometimes take time, thought, and reflection yet we have a tendency to think a person’s immediate response is indicative of how our words will have effected them longer term.
Communication has potential for Memorable. Communication has potential for Long Term Effects, both good and bad. Invested in with more Grace and Love upfront, invested in with a little more active listening and a few less harsh words has the potential for being, Power, Potential, and Oxygen for later that might not always exist.
Also important to remember the words of anyone, on any given day are more than the product of just the words you speak. You might not have spoken the right words does not always equals they were trained to handle the wrong words appropriately. Imperfect people communicating have potential for friction. Friction set to unforgivable, unchangeable, set in stone seems unwise.
My ears, my ability to Read and Write, my Comprehension based on the definitions I value, based on the career I have chosen gets upsold to ideal less than ideally, likely is potentially a problem for others as well. Sometimes words have many meanings, and we grasp onto the definition that fits best to most of the problems and solutions in our life.
Abstract concepts like Throughput can pertain to problems from Reading Comprehension to Cars on the Roadway to Traffic on a Network does not equal those are all exactly similar systems that are viewed in exactly similar ways. Context, and Concrete Examples chosen have the potential for leading to interesting, memorable, and relevant or potentially upsold to less relevant to fields that are lower priority and less worthy of consideration.
People Comprehend in different lights, based upon their previous training and Life experience, not having Mercy and Grace for Heard, Perceived, and Comprehended in different lights, in different ways seems unwise.
Someone that is an Engineer might appreciate communication talked about like Building a Bridge Between two People. Someone that is an Artist might appreciate communication talked about like a dance, potential for an epic display and example for all to see or potential for falling if unpracticed and unprepared.
Communication has potential to be different things to different people. People that know they are being watched, observed, and listened to have potential for talking to other people as well as the person at hand, and while that can be value added it is far from always value added. Being pulled in two directions has the potential for less direct, less freedom with words might lead to concessions for words used that are sufficient for some and sufficient for others yet great for none.
Group conversation has potential for changing motivations in speech, directness, oxygen to speak directly, oxygen to use the best word for the moment. The word that is best for the masses always upsold to the best for the individual? No potential for losses based upon greater throughput desired by the speech of leaders? Knowing Leaders have the potential for less than ideal Throughput for some can be factored into own decision making, potential for helping valuing the key details in ways they were meant versus the way they were delivered. Comprehension can be better for some equals the some it is better for might not always be known.
The Words might have close to ideal value for some, does not equal we always are the ones that factor into the some ideally. Our ability to hear, perceive, comprehend, and actively listen might be less than others in the crowd, others in the audience might be closer to hear what was meant potentially in more ways than one.
A quiet voice might know how it was meant the best. A quiet voice might not know how it was meant the best yet might understand the greatest potential for problems. Lower volume voices not always valued seems unwise, not all are trained to speak out in perceivable ways, comprehendible ways, ways with enough Emphasis to be ideally or sufficiently memorable. Understand the problem, know the solution does not always equal has the potential to communicate the problem the solution effectively, in a way that won’t be viewed with extreme skepticism.
My communication, anyone’s communication required to be ideal to have active listeners seems unwise. People that share and then are punished for sharing are taught a lesson, that if communication is less than ideal it will not be appreciated, it is likely to be disrespected, it is likely to be punished. Potential for that turning up “Stop, there is a cliff 5 feet in front of you” from amping in the future, best not to teach people sharing leads to problems.
Engineering with Non Disclosures, Legalism that says you can’t say that amps things said always sufficiently? People need extra tight ropes to walk on with words at critical times? But the contract, the finely crafted words get upsold to ideal while they do not always provide finely crafted words and oxygen for critical times.
Requirement to speak up with extra snares and gotchas makes things more difficult, amps support less than sufficiently at times and gets upsold to less.
Logic systems that have Exascale Supercomputers that Max Profit for some and all the medical knowledge in the world at their fingertips can’t utilize that to ruin people? Pattern Matching and Logic are systems that max profit for some while leaving others with less, and No, that does not amp ideally, or even close to sufficiently all the time.
The problem, we have not Maxed Profit in a way that will maintain funding.
The solution not generatable?
Max Profit is invested in with a limited set of variables, a limited set of variables not always chosen with ideal intentions and motivations.
How things should have played out and how things did play out are far different systems. Known that is normal, usual, common gives potential for consideration for backup plans. Words don’t always correspond to actions, don’t always correspond to less legalism, communication is valuable, communication based upon words has potential for less value than claimed.
Do the words turn up more Grace and Bridges Built or More Legalism and Protectionism always amped effectively? Always brought into consideration before spoken? Imagine if Politicians were required to ask that question with every sentence they wrote, every sentence they spoke.
Ronald Reagan said “every man forced to look upon a scar”, imagine if he said other men make bad decisions but I being great need to show you how things work. Reagan’s version builds more Bridges has more Potential to tear down walls.
Prideful version is less relatable, inspires rage and a test for the audience.
Relatable and not associated with rage generation leads to feeling of he gets it, his words have potential, potential that are worthy of inspiring trust, hope, and encouragement. Harsh words, arrogant words, demanding words have the potential for less inspirational.
Inspiration and Encouragement that delivers takes tact, has potential for being upsold to less. The same words of encouragement have likelihood for needing to be changed to fit the moment and people that haven’t pondered it, haven’t experienced certain events, or haven’t invested in enough hypotheticals can’t likely get that. If the words “You can do it” won’t deliver what will you say? If the words “Never Say Die” don’t resonate with your audience, what will you say?
The same person that always says Never Say Die might be encouraging until one day hit with a big unexpected problem and Never Say Die might not be the perfect words for the time. Maybe acknowledging the problem and a reminder as the future is never known and not guaranteed for anyone might be higher value added for relatability.
There is a way to say “Never Say Die” without saying Never Say Die, in a way that is more valuable based on context, time, and location. Also an important reminder that the world would have more encouragement and hope amped if it didn’t silence so many voices in advance, it might be a small consolation but others in the world likely would like to lift you up if they felt they could. Likely 10 people would be saying Never Say Die if given the opportunity, but if you saw 10 people give you thumbs up on your daily walk, would you truly appreciate it?
Encouragement needs to be valued to be effective. Volume can devalue encouragement non ideally, lack of volume can devalue encouragement non ideally. Words said too often thus they no longer resonate is possible, words said too few so they seem poorly invested in is possible. Different meanings and word play can reduce value in words, can reduce encouragement throughput. Jokes can lessen appreciated as serious.
People that might want to discourage might use words like Lever Pay Pie. Used enough might reduce effectiveness and throughput of NsdTp! Never Say Die Throughput! Competition does not always desire to inspire Wins in the other team. Encouragement factors into wins, and into people less miserable. People might not say they want the other team to be miserable, but actions speak louder than words.
Do teams really invest in encouraging the other teams to greater potential in their life? Do teams really invest in encouraging those benched, those that never made it on the field? We don’t say we want others to be miserable, but do we actually invest in encouragement more than just with a few words that we can upsell via legalism to we tried our best and that is efficient love and grace delivered?
Time is limited, one can say they want others to be successful, loved, have hope and encouragement for the future, but does the time invested equal likely to actually deliver those results? World with 8 billion people, Church with a subset of that population does not really deliver that feeling, at least in 2023, at least for my life. People invest when convenient. People limit oppression when convenient. Make no mistake, people invest in precedent by the choices they make. Not what you want for your future, might want to change course.
Sometimes someone might have the right words to correct our communication throughput yet might have the wrong position. My position is not CEO can lead to me questioning the value I can add by talking with a CEO. More trained and with higher visibility higher oversight maybe they know better than me. Possibility for others know better than me might lead to divests in less than ideal ways. Attempts to add value are not always appreciated has potential to lead to less attempts made, not necessarily a reduced desire to add value. Complication is hard, not always simple to get right, add complication without sufficient throughput?
Thought through hypotheticals is more than zero investment in possibilities, less than investment in all hypotheticals equals less than invested in all possibilities. Some hypotheticals can remind us of all potential problems we don’t know and thus limit confidence in trying to add value.
The words that would be highest value from our perspective might not always be useful for the current time is likely not fully pondered. What would have liked to be said and what is said is many times entirely different.
Desire to be value added from words does not guarantee to be value added. Encouragement and Grace over extra potential hypotheticals and complications sometimes can be the greater value added system. That is reduced potential in one direction and increased potential in another. That is likely not always fully pondered.
Encouragement and Grace that can mean real Throughput for Win Wins can lead to potential problems not always considered. Potential problems that might be worthy of consideration even if the Encouragement and Graceful words spoken were far more High Value Added. Extra Oxygen and Throughput created via Encouragement and Grace is directional, allowing it to be More Grace and Oxygen in the room for others by considering other potential problems (possibly at a later time or in less discouraging times) seems wise.
Grace and Oxygen equals reduced Pressure and More Ability to Focus, Greater Focus equals Greater Potential for Problems found, will the Problems found amplify the same level of Grace and Oxygen?
My Tech Blog 