Poor Leadership

YouTube like multiple other services and infrastructure I have depended upon have left me robbed of support in a critical time.

Do I want them to spend time in Jail before critical times in their lives like they have allowed to happen to me? No. Why? Because having support built up is far from a guarantee in this World and spending time and Jail will make it even harder.

Losing the encouragement from my YouTube account is one of many services that have been limited from me, services including access to call 911 in an Emergency. Limited access to networks factors into confidence, encouragement, hope.

I desire others to go what I have gone through is not true value added. Justice delivers inefficiently, reduces throughput. My services being robbed is monstrous does not equal more monstrous is likely to lead to a better society.

Being an artist and being robbed of contributions after I have spent days out on the street, in storms, robbed of dignity time and time again, being robbed of contributions at critical moments is high discouragement amped.

My time since graduating college has reminded me, life on Earth is far from an ideal system, upsold to the long term main attraction will fail to deliver. Beautiful Clouds and Beautiful Days have the potential to momentarily make us forget that evil is still a real part of Earth and lack of support networks.

YouTube might not reverse their decision on my account but that is likely due to less than sufficient training, less than sufficient realization that their actions are hurting in real ways, with high potential for game changing consequences long term.

It would be nice if they learned their lesson before doing it to someone else that is less forgiving, potentially less fortunate than me. Support Output losses, like Support Output losses that factor into funding at critical times, that factor into Grace available or Not Available in the Future are being amped and likely being claimed as zero consequence for society.

I can’t see the corrupt strings that are helping call the shots against my life does not equal the support output losses will enable the Future in more ideal ways. A future with support reduced due to an unseen enemy is in the works, stopping it requires visibility I do not have.

Same kind of support, same people doing this are likely in financial institutions, places where people invest their savings. Ties to reduced support has high potential for taking hard earned gains and turning them to nill.

Lack of protection has potential to snowball into greater lack of protection in the future and is likely to only get worse if the course isn’t changed immediately. Iceberg dead ahead does not always equal others listen, actively listen in a timely way.

Robbing me today has zero potential to lead to those robbing me having their investments robbed in the future? Setting precedent has consequences.

Full course ahead, necessary without grace and exceptions not usually the wisest system.

Mercy for the merciful, Grace only for those that give grace seems unwise to turn up. Humanity is less than ideal judgers of what constitutes grace and mercy.

Only water and bread for life could be considered grace, could be considered mercy. Not really what I would call the Golden Rule Amplified.

I need to decide on this or that has potential for amping less than sufficiently. Specially without visibility or support. Wise to continue to decide with vastly obfuscated access to relevant details?

Visibility is reduced not always with clear knowledge or clear perception. Relevance is limited on the common. Requirement to make decisions is important for Throughput. Requirement to do something does not always equate to wise to do it.

Knowing when to stop making decisions based on iffy throughput of relevant details due to lack of support? Weather the storm in similar far from exact systems is possible.

Decisions have potential for being consequential. Decisions made can be higher value added than no decision made, does not always equate to original decision made is higher value added. A bit set to 0 or 1 is a starting point, set between 0 and 1 makes it harder to gauge, has potential for reducing throughput dramatically. Decisions with less grace and zero eraser has high potential for problematic.

Strong decisions are useful, that is why they are turned up many times. Strong decisions do not always equate to right decision. Right has potential for subject to change, has a bit of a precedent for it.

People build plans based upon Strong decisions. Important to build on rock, and less strong decisions are not always considered rock, potential for considered shaky ground. Faults admitted, wrongs admitted are not usually dealt with in just ways, while those that many times are trying to get others to admit wrongs might claim they are.

There was a mistake in the paperwork. Then other paperwork gets called into question. Mistake in one place potential for a mistake in another. If authorities’ paperwork is called into question, if the systems they rely upon are called into question, then elections and judgments, decisions can all be called into question.

Our society is sufficiently graceful to allow leaders to recant their mistakes? Is taught to say they apologized and are trying to make it better? Not sure society is really taught that, not sure leaders and politicians really amp that by default. Able to correct mistakes is turned down, Image is more valuable than Truth to maintain power has consequences.

Grace matters, throughput is all that matters is amplified on the common in a way that hurts many. Throughput is a broad term, throughput of Grace is important though not all talk about that.

If I give grace to 5 people, and only one person passes that grace on to others. Is that sufficient throughput of Grace? Would life be better without that one person passing grace on to others? Output based upon a sequential line of people, comment made to A to B to C to D etc. has higher potential for lost than made to A B C and D. All it takes is one bent out of shape person to reduce grace throughput for all?

Anger tests, tests that Anger compounded over time is less than ideal value added. I prefer to be Grace, Hope, and Encouragement, and what has been done to be is unlikely to manifest in ideal ways with anyone. I am not Christ, and that has potential for reminded in Non Ideal Ways.

I am not all intelligence out, and I am not all intelligence in. I am not all wisdom out and I am not all wisdom in. My value creation is less than ideal, anyone on Earth, that upsells their value creation to ideal is likely selling you on a perfect image that is likely to amp less than sufficiently over time.

Negate people as Perfect, negate people as always ideal amps. Hypotheticals are useful, can be used to think about where we might make mistakes, where our anger might be brought to unreasonable levels, where our logic could be clouded by emotion and the events of the day.

God left to right wrongs has higher potential than decisions based on events of a day, events of the day that have high likelihood for being judged without reasonable capacity, where too close to a problem is turned up by default, where details, details that could make one regret their decisions are not always provided.

People taught a lesson like to teach a lesson and that has potential for teaching about unknowns and lack of sufficient support and training in non ideal ways.

God might not always right wrongs in a way we can see. God might not always right wrongs on a timeline we like. That does not mean it is wiser for us, us that have had our perception clouded and access to relevant details reduced to take judgment into our own hands.

Even if God never rights a wrong, does not equal man would right it correctly or wisely. Unknowns that are not always revealed sufficiently factor into decision making. Health problems are huge but if we don’t experience those health problems first hand do we really have sufficient capacity to judge how someone in their shoes might respond? Negate ideal capacity to comprehend all health problems sufficiently for judgment.

Each person is different, a combination of good training and less than ideal training, health problems, hopes and dreams, support provided and support negated.

People that are trained less than sufficiently make decisions. Decisions they have the potential to regret, decisions that have consequences, that are made with a requirement to be a strong decision. The wrong might not be righted does not equal there is zero potential for shame, zero potential to weigh on consciousness. Seeing a mistake made painted and repainted with no power to stop it can be heart breaking.

Have capacity to make a decision does not always equate to will have capacity or power to right it.

Engineer could forget to install a safety valve, potentially turned up due to pressure by business and a max profit fast paced society based upon Throughput is all that matters. Engineer could choke to death before that safety valve is added to the design. Easy to upsell future to knowns non ideally.

“There will be time to fix that” is a projection, projection based upon unknowns.

Increased pressure, increased interrupts, less ability to Focus factors into support. Person is handling A great, give them B, C, and D as well has potential for amping less than sufficiently yet is turned up on the common.

Throughput is all that matters, Profit is all that matters teaches less than ideal lessons. Rest factors into ability to think clearly, amplify support in meaningful ways. Imagine a trucker that needs to get a shipment across. Society that teaches throughput and profit is all that matters, that support won’t be available if throughput is reduced factors into decision making. A trucker low on sleep is likely to sleep to protect the public and the roads or is likely to take caffeine pills to get the shipment there because throughput and profit means support vs no support?

Society that amps grace and forgiveness, positive choices rewarded would be ideal. Yet this world is far less than ideal. Roads could be safer with more grace and a system that is less hell bent on max profit.

People left to feel unloved feeling like there will not be never be sufficient grace and oxygen in the room for them is a problem in 2023. Will it be a problem in 2025?

How awareness is raised upon a problem factors into appreciated or factors into generating more of the problem. Comprehension is amplified in Non Ideal Ways has potential to generate More Comprehension is amplified in Non Ideal Ways.

The World can establish a mistake cannot be made, will not be forgiven if made has potential for reducing confidence when mistakes are made. Confidence reduced can lead to more mistakes made. Raising awareness without compounding problems is not a given, is not guaranteed.

A system that teaches a man that mistakes will not be forgiven, will never be forgiven and fires that man has been taught a lesson. Setting that precedent factors into support for their families, friends, and future coworkers. A system that teaches that way thinks their support output is ideal, always sufficient for mistakes never made, and that is a weak way to amplify support.

Set communication throughput at 100% equals need to say it twice? Say it, but say it in a way they won’t hear it, won’t comprehend it is an impossible system?

“They knew better” has high potential for partially true, know 5% of implications does not equal 100% of implications 100% that is not always vocalized. Say enough to meet legal requirements does not always equal sufficient love. Tell someone don’t do this will call it ProblemA. Given 5 minutes of conversation and then forgotten, or comprehension actually raised to a meaningful level where ProblemA is more unlikely?

Older people, people with more experience likely have the ability to comprehend more problems generated by ProblemA over 10 year, 20 year spans. Just because their comprehension is raised on ProblemA does not always mean it is vocalized, or if it is vocalized will always be heard or appreciated.

Less time and experience does not equate to less intelligent. More time and experience does not equate to more intelligent. Intelligence alone does not always equate to sufficient knowledge for ideal amplification, Intelligence that values that is not always turned up sufficiently on earth.

Intelligence might lead to ability to open the door to a maze. Experience has more potential for getting one to the exit swiftly. An intelligent person might be able to know to eat bugs, how to think of a way to build fire and something to hold water, yet someone that has walked a path for years has higher potential for getting to safety.

Experience gives knowledge of some possible mistakes, yet there are statistical anomalies, cases that can’t be factored in where intelligence has the ability to save the day. Experience does not amplify knowledge of all problems, ability to creatively solve unexpected problems I would consider intelligence.

Past has tried to walk certain paths and failed does not equate to the Future is guaranteed to fail walking those paths. The Future not taking into account years of wisdom and experiences has more potential for seeing the same problems, required to solve the same problems. Required to solve same problems has potential for less ability, throughput, time, and resources to solve the other problems, new problems, unexpected problems, the same problems that likely limited the past that were never solved, never vocalized.

A man that walks through the forest and gets lost then found learns to bring a compass with him in the future.

An intelligent man would say having a compass is useful if I am venturing into the forest.

An intelligent man would also say losing a compass is possible. Reliance without a backup plan has potential for amping less than sufficiently.

Every case unlikely to be accounted for does not equal it is wise to negate all wisdom and experience. Knowledge that every case is unlikely to be accounted for should factor into desire to have increased Intelligence and decision making capacity. Focus on turning up generalized problem solving and creative problem solving, critical thought is not always sufficiently invested in.

A man ideally equipped is not guaranteed to make it through. Support is valuable, the road to the Future is unexplored. Perseverance in spite of failure, sufficient encouragement matters and is worth amping in more ideal, more sufficient ways. This world throws monstrous things at people, saying it always amplifies sufficient support and encouragement would be unwise, saying that others are always sufficiently trained to amplify support and encouragement in others would be unwise.

Leaders can be trained in different ways. Leadership is competitive, competitive can lead to support reduced rather than amplified. That is a problem for society. LeaderA that teaches the public they don’t want LeaderB to be successful, and LeaderB that teaches the public they don’t want LeaderA to be successful seen as ideal leadership training as ideal support long term seems unwise.

Invested in competitors making better decisions, better decisions that could mean the difference between life and death support in the future is not amped sufficiently from what I see in 2023 and before. Correlating Leadership to football, the losing team does not sufficiently amp great decision making capacity in the winning team. Politics is different than football, yet the desire to win and max profit seems to be amplified in very similar ways at the dismay of many.

If the opposing party wins will they be trained with sufficient grace, trained to sufficiently provide for the others in society that did not win? Losing is hard, pride is easy to get caught up with specially when opposing teams amp less than ideally less than fairly. Able to distinguish pride from poor choices of new leaders has high potential for amping less than sufficiently.

Need to set the score straight has potential for being less than an ideal amplifier of time. Wrongs that are allowed to set for years are unlikely to be fully appreciated by others in the room, others that are concentrated on the current moment and future. Real Wrongs happen does not equate to they will always be righted in the ways we expect. People upsell initial comprehension based on vastly limited resolution to sufficient. The wrongs of the past might effect us differently with more or less knowledge.

Different could be worse, different could be better. Reality is different than hypotheticals. Greater observation, greater access to observation is less than sufficient at times. Leaders with better views at ground level might have made different decisions. People at ground level view with better ability to view from the leaders perspective and knowledge might have made different decisions.

Leaders are privy to knowledge others like myself don’t have access to. Ability to see from the eyes of the person with highest probability to perceive and comprehend truth is Power, yet will society turn up their voice sufficiently before problems arise?

Top of the mountain, bottom of the mountain, two vastly different perspectives that are not even close to all perspectives. Negate ideal position for observational capacity to sufficiently claim grounds on ideal truth.

The telescope can be put in the wrong place ever pondered? Position factors into ability to comprehend truth vs see images on the wall (Plato’s Allegory of the Cave).

There are tons of optical illusions based upon light and position in the world, think our ability to see a planet from far away has zero potential to amplify reduced comprehension? Details the size of humans, the size of skyscrapers, the size of rocks, the size of dust, at the microscopic scale factor into true comprehension, yet we theorize about ideal comprehension of worlds we have never visited.

Phenomena and unexpected events happen on Earth, things we can’t easily comprehend or explain. Think planets many times the size of Earth have no potential for similar events?

Potential for unexpected anomalies in Space. Universe is big, our realm of comprehension is small. Even if life experience allowed us to experience comprehension of 1% of everything on Earth, which has potential for unlikely, 1% leaves a lot of room for improvement.

We base intelligence and wisdom on scale that is based on point of view. Point of view of this time in history. 500 years from now what is considered intelligence and what is considered wisdom will likely factor in more. More might not always equate to ideal capacity to deal with more. Complexity has potential for growing at a faster rate than our ability to comprehend and utilize it in ideal or potentially even sufficient ways.

The past could have dealt with the exact same problem we are facing at this time in history, yet the detail might be hidden away in a book that is in a library forgotten and never touched on some shelf. Knowledge exists does not always equal knowledge is sorted, indexed, and ready for use. Knowledge that is a gem, that is hard won, has potential for lost over time.

There is potential for knowledge to exist and society or those with that knowledge to hide that knowledge, knowledge that could be critical from those who need it. Knowledge is power, and people don’t always like sharing.

Knowledge in a max profit system is not always amplified sufficiently or in a timely way. Taking that into account in decision making possible? probable?

Consider a path from A to Z and people that have already walked the path see that person on H and know there will be a problem at T. Will the people have a sufficient voice to amplify comprehension to the person at H? Problem known could be more value added, could be less value added, might be wise to turn up yet those that know there is a potential problem might not have adequate support for getting the message to the person at H.

People that are trying to help don’t always get a message across, do not always get a message across in loving way, way that will be perceived and comprehended sufficiently right. And not all people are trying to help.

Unwise for society to amp and re-amp negated support. Teaches a lesson about what is considered a right choice and what is considered a wrong choice.