Active Listening Emphasized

Active Listening Emphasized has Potential to Create Value by Decreasing Miscommunication, and Increasing Clarifying Communication Throughput.

Active Listening is Power

Emphasis is Power

Active Listening Emphasized is Powerful for decreasing Miscommunication, and Increasing Clarifying Communication Throughput

Easy to Non Ideally set Observational Capacity and Resolution to Max Possible Throughput. Gains are not always easy, does not equal Gains are Not Possible. Gains are Possible and worthy of pursuing, factors into Peace, Encouragement, and Hope for a New Day

Multiple Videos exist to turn up Active Listening and Observation does not equal they will ever be ideal. Better is not ideal. Room for improvement gives reason to Hope

Responding over Reacting has potential to lead to longer conversations. Angry reactions and outbursts have potential to create silence. Silence is not an ideal communication throughput enabler.

Angry outbursts are tests for others. Others set to do not have enough stress without those tests would be unwise.

Stress and Anxiety has the potential to Non Ideally Compound. Tests don’t always arrive without other Tests. Less Tests upfront can be Power that is Not Always Fully Appreciated.

Some people that don’t have sufficient health care exist lets call them GroupA. Some people think it is wise to test a group of people, GroupB to see their limits. God has clarity to realize GroupA=GroupB does not equal people always comprehend that GroupA and GroupB are the same group or a group with heavy overlaps.

There is no guarantee the person one is testing is not a 20 year old that just got diagnosed with cancer. People turn up tests not always knowing they are turning up tests.

Need to validate they can be trusted without training them the importance in being trustful

Testing without Teaching is problematic

Being a Leader is Testing on others

Delegating Tasks is Testing on others

Asked for an Opinion on something that has the potential to be perceived and comprehended in Non Ideal Lights is Testing on others

Freedom of Speech has potential for not sufficient Tests Reduced. Freedom of Speech is Important does not equal it has zero potential to cause problems, problems like being tested too much

Surrounding self with less judgmental and more encouraging people is a possible system. Choice has potential to leave some with less support in ways that compound non ideally.

Being sufficiently encouraging is difficult at times, life does not always deal ideal hands. Friends that forgive fast, that are less judgmental are higher potential for long term support.

Being surrounded with people that are judgmental, condescending, that are disrespectful has the potential for weighing heavily over time. Has the potential for turning up judgment that it is unwise to hang out with those friends.

Some people just don’t match well together, just being around each other has potential to turn up less than ideal qualities in both or several. Who you surround yourself with has the potential to lead to more angry outbursts or less angry outbursts. More angry outbursts can turn new potential friends away. Potentially unwise to be close to a venting dragon.

Even if the person that is angry is in the right, has good reason to be angry, does not equal their anger seen and heard is appreciated, looked at like a system others want to join, want to be around. Not testing to anger in the first place is a lot of power. Making your friends angry has the potential to lead to less opportunities is likely not a fully appreciated system.

Anger is hard because it is impulsive, what generates it usually is a surprise and comes out of nowhere. We try to invest in better anger management, yet that allows us to process somethings better and possibly have less visibility of things that can really make us angry.

Compounding unfair losses are unfair. Unfair seen as a good reason to be angry has the potential to lead to a lot of anger. Requirement for life to be fair and just to be less angry has potential for a lot of anger. Repeated negated justice is problematic, not just because it allows friends, family, and self to be robbed, but also because the anger has the potential to rob twice.

Imagine an election stolen, peoples votes robbed. Robbed election and corrupt officials has the potential to lead to health problems, people you love and care about robbed of healthcare and put out on the street. That generates a lot of anger, a lot of anger that can lead to people you care about yelled at, even possibility of a heart attack. People that didn’t commit the wrong can be damaged greatly by the wrong compounded with anger.

Unfair creates Anger. Anger can lead to unfair treatment. Unfair and Injustice has potential to compound in not always seen ways. Injustice can amplify more Injustices in need of Justice, thus is it really fair to require Justice from those that were treated unfairly in the first place?

Fair hinges on a dime when there a many systems that weigh in on the scales of the value comprehended and executed upon. PartyA wrongs PartyB, yet PartyC could have prevented PartyA and PartyB from being around each other. PartyD could have given PartyA a different more fair opportunity that lead to PartyA and PartyB never meeting. PartyE could have given PartyB a different more fair opportunity that lead to PartyA and PartyB never meeting.

True Justice possible without weighing implications of all parties and values on system? Factors into what message is turned up and what message is turned down. Message Comprehended and Heard Matters, Relevant details never recalled factors into Message Not Comprehended and Not Heard.

PartyF’s message could have lead to PartyA never wronging PartyB. Yet PartyF’s message was robbed. Limiting access to sufficient training and opportunities and claiming justice is unwise.

Disagreeing in a less confrontational more inclusive way, possible?

A great friend is a quality not attributed to all. Being a better friend has possibility for amplifying a lot of value in others and in self.

Disagreement voiced before hearing someone’s entire story has potential for reducing communication throughput. Communication that can be clarifying.

If someone is on the path to talk about PointA, PointB, PointC, and PointD and you strongly disagree with PointA high potential for not getting to hear PointB, PointC, or PointD. People have the potential for non ideally reducing access to information, information that can clarify PointA or allow the listener to comprehend why speaker arrived at PointA.

Hearing someone out before making judgments is power, power that is not always capitalized upon in a fast paced society. Some points have to be disagreed with out of principle, Image, Image that is generated dependent upon bugs and surveillance. Has the potential to not lead to ideal communication, and relevant information divulged. A friend that does not disagree swiftly has the potential for putting those they are listening to at risk.

People don’t always hear each other out, for good reason at times, and that does not always amp ideally. Hot button topics upfront can lead to lost communication. Hot button topics can lead to weight, to excess emphasis that takes over what details are seen as valuable.

People like to make swift judgments on friend or foe. Hot button topic like a coin flip. Heads or Tails. If Heads agrees with your point, and speaker is Heads keep listening. If Tails agrees with your point, and speaker is Tails keep listening. If choice disagrees with your point, others that are on your team might not fully appreciate you listening further.

Listening to people, giving oxygen to their communication and message is not always seen as zero cost. Too High of cost to listen can easily be non ideally turned up. Fostering a society that lets people hear each other out before making judgments is far from a given. Sounds bad can lead to smells bad that leads to lost jobs is a real threat to viability of life and throughput.

Villain Level Contrast is easy to have non ideally turned up, and is hard to turn down compounded with corporate images that like to stay squeaky clean instead of doing right by people. Costs too much to help them, to talk to them, allowed by CEOs not the wisest thing to turn up.

Corporations had a chance to protect and chose not to. Chose a different route. Fully comprehended how that will factor into future losses?