I would highly advise people that care about Video and Image throughput to not rely upon Smartphones for Throughput. Smartphones connected to the network can be easily limited via corrupt network practices.
Likely more powerful DSLR and Mirrorless cameras can be limited remotely as well. The cost of oppression is High, likely a very non zero death toll associated with all that.
People that are oking limiting my cameras and support output may God prevent them from amping a message for 10 years to make them comprehend the value they are subtracting.
People that want to continue to profit don’t limit others ability to profit.
Google has proven unable to protect from Oppressive power, Apple has proven unable to protect from Oppressive power. Trusting them with Throughput of Video and Pictures is a Choice.
Convenience does not always amp ideal results.
System learns, Doesn’t Really Learn.
System is headed in Right Direction? Has proven it has made changes, and choices that has the potential to lead to more Ideal Directions? No
Part of Support Network relies upon a system that makes gains in corrupt ways leads to need for real change, real change that is made harder because of reliance on a system that is ineffective corruption out by default.
ProductA is amping ProblemB. But to fix ProblemB requires reliance on ProductA.
Alternatives are harder, costly, take time to learn, in ways that can lead to support reduced in other directions.
Engineering and tech systems should be like a bridge, they should build support and potential for making progress in the future. Should be systems that increase value creation over time, not reduce it.
Engineering and tech systems are more like a car that is claimed to go 0 to 60 in 5 seconds that can’t go 15 mphs. Maybe better to say 0 to 60 in 5 seconds *
>* for some, some that are deemed worthy to not be oppressed
That can be controlled can’t run that at top of the page
Easy to upsell less ideal message to Flash Player for Apple
Can’t run that interoperability required is a useful system, consider the possibilities
Doesn’t Amp Profits, Products doesn’t have to be factored into Search
Backroom deals at Apple and Google?
Tech Elites as Oligarchs?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oligarchy
Oppression that can prevent my family from eating is just a part of doing business? Par for the course?
If you found out an oppressor built your house, do you tear the house down? If you do, now you have lost time rebuilding you could have been amping to reduce oppression for others. Do you let the oppressors that built the house keep oppressing so they can build other houses? No.
Just because a non oppressive company built your product, does not equal they will not oppress others in the future once enabled with gains from your purchase.
Purchasing from a currently non corrupt company does not guarantee future throughput will be corruption free. Like if you give money to a clothing company that takes those profits and reinvests those profits in another company where they think they are increasing jobs in a locality but are actually funding slave and child labor.
Oversight reduced can lead to gains is a common system that fails to deliver adequate results, adequate reduced oppression.
Fixing problems quietly with a High Value Check attached might not always be adequate inspiration for Throughput of Real Change.
Future has High Potential for Amplifying More Light on subjects. Accepting lump sums of money and going own way in amicable way might be less able to be a useful system going forward. Mediation and Solving things quietly leads to Flint Michigan like Water leads to less trust and belief in mediation and solving things quietly?
Corrupt corporations profit in non ideal ways has potential for less trust in Arbitration as a useful system going forward, a less beneficial system for public safety and trust going forward.
Public strings attached and long lengthy painful court processes that bankrupt companies time and effort has high potential for not amplifying feeling of good deal either.
Pain point not high enough has potential for not fully appreciated.
My Java Programming brush limited is one thing, if it factored into lines that take twice as long at the airport, as it taking twice as long to get a meal? Losses that can be felt, without knowing the cause?
Corrupt companies is why lines take twice as long? Consider the implications.