Events, a single scene is limited. Number of scenes required for a Short Story? Short Story need be an entire Hero’s Journey to be meaningful?
Men and Cats have something in common, they are both amplifiers of each others support but less than ideal amplifiers
A few strokes of Free Design followed by Fixed design in a Short Story?
As if the Budget was in Time Dollars?
Invest more likely to get more, though this Reality does not Amp Ideally
Cup of Water will In No Way Lose Their Reward. Love is Greater than Many Sins
Small Contributions Respected with Never Say Die Encouragement
People to meaningful contributions without biting off too much to chew that can lead to both non ideal reliance and losses to support?
8 Billions People with knowledge of How to Add Directional Support for the person with the least help on Earth?
Focused Laser of Support couldn’t amplify greater support for World based on weakest link?
People to concentrated support over judging each other has higher potential for leading to less situations of victimization and people judging each other less?
Unexpected can be Interesting, Less Expectation as Mathematical Systems?
Foreshadowing what a Summary of the Short Story Might look like?
Authors that can project the Key Details about story likely to be taken away have higher potential for delivering those Details in an Effective Manner
If man could think 20 times as fast, but all men could think 20 times as fast, how would that change things?
More is Not All More In
20x is not 40x, 40x is not 80x, 80x is not 160x
Future likely brings more potential than we have right now
2023 to 2033 Power in Thought? 10 year of Gains Empowered with Worldwide Supercomputers can be a lot of Power, a lot of Power that is not all 2043 Power in.
Always concentrated on Throughput gains unlikely to lead to ideal appreciation for fact life is short, not always lived
People that spend 100% of their time improving Throughput gains for the World that don’t live always likely to create larger gains than those out living life, critical thinking inspired by a World full of Phenomena?
If a man didn’t invest in greater throughput gains might the world have wound up with less? Yes. If a man didn’t invest in more than throughput gains might the world have wound up with less? Yes.
People put undue burden on themselves to make gains in a system that does not always amp truth. Gains are valuable, without Hubris those Gains couldn’t have been better if support was delivered in other directions, set to given? Gains are value added, required to be sold like fountain of youth to get funding is not all truth amplified.
Sales, perceived as potentially more valuable than reality is in by design.
If I sell ProductA which has a certain amount of support amplification
ProductA = 1 water bottle
or ProductA = 10 water bottles
Both add support, both have potential for being support amplification in different ways, light and head starts matter, did I need 10 water bottles or did I need 1? Did I need 2 water bottles and survived on 1 to help others? Did I need 2 water bottles and give 8 water bottles away to save others?
Money can be spent on Water Bottles. Support is more than Water Bottles, thus purchase of water bottles might be limiting support in other directions.
People without access to resources huddled next to a giant pack of water bottles in a blizzard?
Support is More than Water, Support requires Water too.
Life is More than just Water and Shelter. Bread and water.
Nsdtp! – Never Say Die Throughput!
Not all reminders out that people need Toilet Paper too
People don’t always have ideal visibility to what increases and what reduces support
3 Important Details that Reinforce a Theme that are Memorable over a Short Story can be Powerful
Powerful Wisdom, Stored Away, so nobody else can get to it breaks?
5 deadbolts is less than ideal pots of wisdom protected?
Lets think about this for a bit
ChangeA = Civil War and Abolition of Slavery
ChangeB = Martin Luther King Jr. I Have A Dream Speech
ChangeA+ChangeB = ResultA
ResultB = system that doesn’t protect Diversity, and is known to not amp ideally for Minority or Majority
ResultA is Expected, ResultB is the result after 160 years.
ResultB does not lead to feeling of World will get their act together, that less protectionism is a wise choice. Protectionism amped has consequences. Legalism amped has consequences.
Supercomputers are going to fix instantly what man, including man with supercomputers has been unable to fix for 160 years?
Knowledge of likely to fix, cost to fix factors into cycles allotted for use.
Defense Law as after thought or built in by design?
It amps insufficiently in ways that hurts.
It amps insufficiently in ways that hurts ability to rely upon logic.
It amps insufficiently in ways that hurts ability to rely on less legalism, which factors into throughput.
It amps insufficiently in ways that hurts capitalism and ability to depend on hard work as value creation system.
It amps insufficiently in ways that limits clock cycles and future progress in Real Ways. Documentable, Distinguishable losses that factor into reduced output and throughput. Output and Throughput claimed to be of concern to computer systems.
Trust a system that claims to be invested in Throughput gains, yet is not actually invested in those Throughput gains?
A system less filled with hate an rage at unfair more or less likely to amp data consistency?
My Tech Blog 