Reduced Quantity is Power
Creative Problem Solving, Write a Story
Choose a Villain
1. Dragon
2. Vampire
Choose a Villain
1. Giant Spider
2. Titan
3. Medusa
4. Kraken
Having More choices does not always lead to faster delivery, faster ability to deliver on the fly.
Memory factors into Recall Speed, options available has the potential to factor into Recall Speed.
Compare and Contrast between Two Options can be Cheaper from a Processing Standpoint than Four Choices, or Eight Choices, or Sixteen Choices
Variety can enable, can be an enabler does not equal it is always an enabler
Ice Cream shop with 4 flavors or 50 flavors? Too many options can be overwhelming
The song is Delightful, Blissful or
Tranquil, Immaculate, Brilliant, Radiant
Simple choice less conversation?
Head Starts Matter, Latency lagged is not always Throughput Increased
If you have two books to read by end of the hour
One will lead to 70% prize money and One will lead to 90% prize money, only if you finish either. Do you delay choice?
People delay choice at times in non ideal ways that limit actual potential in not fully appreciated ways.
I could write 5 more sentences here, or
Fast choice on Words and other Systems can generate value more swiftly and variety can delay choice
Choosing swiftly not always easy, confidence factors into ability to deliver swiftly. Preparation can have Placebo effect? Likely. If you aren’t prepared your choice is less sure, then you are delayed when trying to make decisions.
Outlines factor into Confidence. Outlines are Ideal Direction Chosen? No. Outlines Enable Greater Throughput? Yes
Compass that spins for 15 minutes, 15 minutes of lost reading has potential to be a few pages of reading lost.
Like someone had an electromagnet next to it?
Supporting Topics are not always ideally invested in
People don’t always realize if the point of a paper is not a math lesson but relies upon teaching and amplifying comprehension of math, that math comprehension might be amplified less than ideally.
Relies on Calculus for results does not equal always delivers ideal Calculus Amplification?
Electromagnetism is useful for making my point here. I chose the lower time value because the supporting point plays a supporting role, not meant to play the lead role so to speak. There were longer videos closer to 15 minutes but I chose a 3 minute video. Does not equal electromagnetism is less valuable. Raising Comprehension of why I choose a video length matters, is useful value and feedback for the world.
The idea is the time spent on prioritizing choosing optimal choice is not time actually added to throughput of future paths. Two paths in the woods be stopped by left or right? Two paths provided sometimes leads to belief those two paths are optimal, were optimally provided. Maybe I need to fly over the woods, or dig a tunnel beneath them or even walk back in the other direction.
Easy to upsell the choices in front of us to the only choices available in Non Ideal Ways.
Investing in Time Management can lead to Time Savings, delaying investment in Time Management is Not All Time Savings Amped
A productive day spends more day in Throughput or more day making decisions? Both are valuable skills
When to know when choice is being delayed too long set to known?
There are a lot of choices that are not life and death in life.
Choices that are less than life or death like clean room or do dishes.
Choosing either swiftly has potential to faster delivery than delaying choice for hours deciding for the best route.
Decisions with more weight are different.
Imagine you have two paths to choose in the forest and one path would take 2 months and one path would take 1 month but you don’t know which path will take 2 months vs 1 month. Schrodinger’s cat with 1 month of time?
Buy In Cost factors into Throughput and Prioritization
One path around the mountain and one path through hot coals?
Choice of riding somewhere with no motorcycle helmet
or Walking
Where walking takes 5 hours?
Similar Not Exact Systems are Useful
People Enable greater risks for Higher Throughput at Times
They upsell convenience gains to 10% chance for fatal to be less of a big deal.
People Amp Risks sometimes Non Ideally
People Try to Limit Risks in ways that drastically reduce throughput at times Non Ideally
The man that set speed limit to 10mph now in an ambulance on that street choking? People can make choices for improving safety that can lead to less appreciation for that choice at later times.
Risk Mitigation can be an enabler is Not Always an Enabler. Concrete examples help 5 dead bolts is NOT all fire safety in. 5 Deadbolts or extra money for a printer for a High Voltage sign in society? Potential for more value from High Voltage sign.
Risk Mitigation can be turned up Non Ideally in some limited directions while reducing Risk Mitigation Non Ideally in other very important directions and it is not always easy to perceive, comprehend when that is.
Systems have trade offs, and people like to upsell it to less.
3 seat belts or leather seats
1 seat belt can increase safety
3 seat belts could limit safety
leather seats can increase experience
experience null costed can be huge
power in dichotomies can also be huge
Leather Seats or Increased Safety that can lead to Reduced Safety? A point that is both valid and could be used for a false dichotomy?
Logical Fallacies can be iffy.
People like Better Experience, Less Pain, and Adequate Safety that Doesn’t limit their Throughput to Zero.
Experience Throughput Matters and gets upsold to less non ideally, life is more than bread and water, bread and water is not all life in
If I were the Competition would I want to increase safety to non ideal levels to reduce ability to deliver? Computer Processor supply lines require Throughput to be competitive in 2023. If I said the competition had to spend 5 hours a day concentrating on Electrical Safety, then I spent 10 minutes of time teaching Electrical Safety at the beginning of the week, which one would have greater throughput?
Safety can be a useful tool to reduce Throughput of Competition Fully Pondered, Respected?
Non Ideal Requirements can be amped for those that limit Throughput Non Ideally
Safety in Excess, Requirements in Excess can add weight, be a Safety Limiter instead of Enabler
System of Profits Off Broken IP Law that limits throughput for some while allowing corporations with expensive lawyers to skate away scot-free?
Is Capitalism Broken in Real Ways? Yes
Factors into Experience of Life, Throughput of Better Quality of Life
Special Unique Matters, 한 줄을 한국어로 번역하거나 다른 언어로 번역하면 해당 줄을 독특하게 만들어 더 기억에 남습니다. 기억에 남는 특별한 고유한 요소, 기억.
Special Unique Matters, if I translate one line to Korean, or any other language it makes that specific line unique, and thus more Memorable. Special Unique Factors into Memorable, Memory.
My Tech Blog 