功率恒定无法理想地模拟电气系统
Power as Constant Fails to Model Electrical Systems Ideally
电池输出功率为 10 瓦、100 瓦、300 瓦，潜在的附加值不高
The battery has output of 10 Watts, 100 Watts, 300 Watts, potential for not true value added
提醒人们重要的是功率是能量传递率，而不是能量传递率
Important to Remind people Power is Rate of Energy Delivered, Not Energy Delivered
300 W = 0.3 kW
过去不存在可以运行 300 瓦的便携式 40V 至 120V 电源，这些现在可以通过太阳能电池板充电，随着时间的推移可能会发生变化有可能以并不总是可以理解的方式改变事物
Portable 40V to 120V Power Sources that can run 300 Watts did not exist in the past, these can now be charged by solar panels, possible changed over time has the potential to change things in ways not always comprehendible
Run for 2 hours = 2 hours * 0.3kW = 0.6 kWH
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilowatt-hour
1 kWH is 3.6 MJ = 3.6 Megajoules
300 Watts ran for 2 hours is = 0.6 kWH*3.6MJ = 2.16 Megajoules
1 Joule
1000 Joules = 1 kilojoule
1,000,000 Joules = 1 * 10^6 Joules = 1 megajoule
可以在 2 小时内提供 2.16 兆焦耳的便携式电源是我们过去没有的电源，可以通过提高电源效率、100 W 灯泡到 10 W LED 灯泡和更大的流明来进一步提高？
Portable power source that can deliver 2.16 megajoules over 2 hours is power that we didn’t have in the past, that can be further turned up by Power Efficiency gains, 100 W Light Bulb to 10 W LED Bulb with Greater Lumen?
超级电容器和通过长期投资提高短期电力输送的能力就是力量
Super Capacitors and Ability to Ramp Short Term Power Delivery via Long Term Investment is Power
可以为超级电容器充电的太阳能电池板有助于生火吗？
Solar panels that could charge a super capacitor useful for starting survival fires?
树木覆盖可能导致充电更加困难
Potential for Charging more difficult with tree cover
改进的超级电容器、改进的电源效率、改进的电池充电——每一个都非常强大，所有的组合都可以改变游戏规则
Super Capacitors Improved, Power Efficiency Improved, Battery Charging Improved – each alone is powerful, all in combination can be Game Changing
人们不理想地将投资和收益设置为线性的、一维的
People non ideally set investment and gains to linear, one dimensional
而不是像现在这样的 4 维+指数
Instead of 4 dimension+ Exponential like they are
可以以更快的速度计算的最短路径与更好的模式匹配相结合，并具有蛮力和组合学的力量？
Shortest path computable at much swifter speed combined with much better pattern matching turned up with power of brute force and combinatorics?
永不言败 Say Die Never
死说永不 Die Say Never
永不言败（叮叮叮777）Never Say Die (Ding Ding Ding 777)
可以通过设计导致鼓励可能、最大利润和收藏夹的组合学，难道不认为使用计算机系统无法产生劝阻吗？
Combinatorics that can lead to Encouragement Possible, Max Profit, and Favorites In By Design, Not think Discouragement can’t be turned up using Computer Systems?
我们不仅需要投资于尊重、鼓励、宽恕和宽容，我们还需要投资于反不尊重和反恶棍级别对比技术。
Not only do we need to be investing in Respect, Encouragement, Forgiveness, and Grace we need to be investing in Anti Disrespect and Anti Villain Level Contrast tech.
随着时间的推移，错误的人想要以非理想的方式自杀的可能性更大
Higher potential for the wrong people that want to turn up suicide over time to be enabled in non ideal ways
我们不仅需要投资于尊重、鼓励、宽恕和宽容，我们还需要投资于反不尊重和反恶棍级别对比技术。
Not only do we need to be investing in Respect, Encouragement, Forgiveness, and Grace we need to be investing in Anti Disrespect and Anti Villain Level Contrast tech.
逻辑谬误、不一致的数据、更好而不是完美的支持、设计不理想是默认情况下在设计、竞争、贪婪之前默认包括最大化利润的邪恶。
Logical Fallacies, Inconsistent Data, Better Not Perfect Support, Designed less than ideally is the Default before Evil In By Design, Competition, Greed that Maximizes Profit is included by default.
打击邪恶、劝阻和支持因腐败而加剧的金融系统，一个远非完美的系统被推销到维持收益的理想状态。 考虑到组合学的所有输入，正义声称并不是真正正确的，理解是动态的，远非理想的投资。逻辑本身，正确这个词，在非理想的方式中变得不确定。 系统不会为自己增加信任。 我会说 System 并不能理想地增强对自身的信任，但这会把它推销到比人类历史现阶段实际应该给予的更多的信任。
Combating Evil, Discouragement, and Support out Financial Systems that are amped by Corruption and a far from perfect system upsold to ideal for purpose of maintaining gains. Justice claimed not really true given all the inputs into the combinatorics, comprehension is dynamic and far from ideally invested in. Logic itself, the word Right, becomes iffy in non ideal ways. System does not amp trust for itself. I would say System does not amp trust for itself ideally, but that would upsell it to more trust than should actually be given at this stage in human history.
下面的视频被放大了，消息很重要，消息的放大不能理想地推销系统以在全民基本收入上取得和维持收益。 一个产生依赖但没有能力实现这种依赖的系统并不理想。
The following video gets amped, the message matters, and the amp of the message can non ideally upsell the system to gains made and maintained on Universal Basic Income. A system that creates reliance without ability to deliver on that reliance is not all ideal.
资本主义，创造 31 万亿美元债务和失败的基础设施的系统？ “经济将投入转化为价值”——资本主义真的崩溃了吗？ | TED Ed |YouTube
Capitalism, the system that creates 31 Trillion Debt and failing infrastructure? “Economies turn inputs into value” – Is capitalism actually broken? | TED Ed | YouTube
从未来偷窃可能被认为是完全赞赏的？
Stealing from the Future likely to be thought fully appreciated?
技术潜力
Tech Potential
没有可能以牺牲 99.9% 人口的生活质量为代价非理想地增加 0.1% 人口的指数收益？
No Potential for Exponential Gains that have the Potential to Non ideally amp 0.1% of population at expense of Quality of Life for 99.9% of the population?
Max Profit 无法获得资金来购买目前在德克萨斯州被放大的水瓶。
Max Profit without access to funds to purchase water bottles currently being amped in Texas.
从好的方面来说，如果我早死，就不必再长时间处理支持系统了
On the plus side, if I die early won’t have to deal with the support out systems for much longer
权力可能需要被弹劾和更换，不确定我现在是否真的有能力这样做
Power likely needs to be Impeached and Replaced, not sure I am really enabled to do so at this time
世界应该相处得比理想的要差得多，不确定为什么会这样
The world should just get along delivers far less than ideally, not exactly sure why that is
人们喜欢打架，人们喜欢戏剧，和平很难，重视小贡献和尊重老师并不总是那么容易
People like to fight, people like drama, peacemaking is hard, small contributions valued and teachers respected is not always easy
最大利润有时是有用的，有时是必需的系统，但并不总是很容易知道什么时候有用，而且当知道时，也不总是很容易从设计中的贪婪、竞争和邪恶中解脱出来
Max profit is a sometime useful, sometimes required system, and it is not always easy to know when that is, and when known it is not always easy to untangle from greed, competition, and evil in by design
销售需要支持吗？ 导致所有购买都是理想选择的？
Sales required for support? Leads to all purchases that are ideally chosen?
出于必要，销售量被放大了很多倍，而不是为此优化消费者或销售人员的价值。
Sales are amped many times out of necessity rather than optimizing value for consumer or salesman for that matter.
库存，移动库存等于理想的采购，不移动库存等于公司未来的理想吞吐量，公司成功交付所需的是社会的理想价值吗？ 公司总不能倒闭吧？
Inventory, move the inventory equals ideal purchases, not moving inventory equals ideal future throughput for company, company required to succeed deliver is ideal value for society? Company can’t be bankrupted always amps ideally?
我不想失去我所依赖的公司，我不想启用错误的金融系统，而且逻辑似乎并不理想。
I don’t want to lose the companies I rely upon and I don’t want to enable the wrong kind of financial systems and the logic does not seem to line up ideally.
未投资的公司将无法提供服务。 我很欣赏这样的服务，比如有车而不是步行，不等于拥有适合所有人的理想汽车放大器，零问题（如车祸）的放大器。
Companies not invested in will cease to be able to provide services. I appreciate services like having a car over walking, does not equal having a car amps ideally for all, amps with zero problems like car crashes.
选择的距离和舒适度因素。 便利驱动利润并不是所有的利润最大化。
Proximity and Comfort factors into choice. Convenience drives Profits is not all Maximize Profit out.
每个走路的人都会被推销到糟糕的体验，但有些步行会被推销到没什么大不了的，以保持一些更好的体验。
Everyone walking gets upsold to Bad Experience, yet some walking gets upsold to no big deal to maintain better experience for some.
人们从不公平的制度、不公平的司法制度中获利，这是生存的必要条件。
People profit on an unfair system, an unfair system of justice, and that is a bit of a requirement for survival.
推动社会更好和积极的变革并不等于更好和已经建立的变革。 可能的更改被追加销售，以非理想方式交付更改。 对进步的理解和可见性是有意限制的，并不理想。
Drive towards better and positive change in society does not equal better and change already established. Change possible gets upsold to change delivered non ideally. Comprehension and Visibility of progress is limited on purpose non ideally.
将金钱因素纳入社会成功以获得正义，获得更多资金和资源，可用于扩大更好更方便的舒适体验和“正义”。 富人比穷人更能起诉盗窃。 知识产权法以牺牲许多人为代价来实现少数人的利益。
Having money factors into success in society for getting Justice, for more access to funds and resources, that can be used to amplify both Better More Convenient Comfortable Experience and “Justice”. Rich can prosecute theft more than the poor. Intellectual Property law enables a few at the expense of many.
梵蒂冈长期以牺牲世界公民的利益为代价，但并非所有人都对基督教充满信心
Vatican that leaves bolt in gear long term at expense of citizens in the World is not all trust in Christianity amped
律师帮助解决公司之间的纠纷有时会被律师推销，这是理想情况下不理想的公司支持的放大器。 律师需要工作，而公司并不总是同意在不考虑双赢不保护的情况下将其推销到理想的双赢。
Lawyers help settle disputes between companies sometimes gets upsold to lawyers are ideal amplifiers of support in companies non ideally. Lawyers need jobs and Companies don’t always agree gets upsold to ideal Win Win without thinking about those the Win Win does not protect.
富人争论谁拥有什么，同时基于不公平的竞争环境掠夺穷人，而梵蒂冈和新教教会坐在看台上。
Rich men argue about who owns what all the while robbing the poor based on an unjust playing field while the Vatican and Protestant Church sits in the bleachers.
过去被推销到理想的写作。 压迫导致吞吐量增加、金字塔、罗马道路、水道，而不是摧毁这些收获，因为邪恶帮助为它们付出代价（斗兽场不是所有的奴隶制、屠杀和帝国灭亡的吞吐量增加），世界说现在我们有水了 喝酒和过去那些使这些收益成为可能的人都是怪物。 没什么大不了的虚伪很有可能以不理想的方式回来咬人。
The past gets upsold to written ideally. Oppression leads to Throughput Gains, Pyramids, Roman Roads, Aqua ducts, and instead of tearing down those gains because evil helped pay for them (colosseum not all slavery, butchery, and throughput gains for empire out), the world says now we have water to drink and those in the past that enabled those gains are monsters. Hypocrisy set to no big deal has high potential for coming back to bite in non ideal ways.
一个压迫帝国的孩子们基于这种压迫获得水
Children of an oppressive empire who get water based on that oppression
孩子们需要水，压迫远非未来的所有价值
Children need water, and oppression is far from all value amped for the future
人们可能不喜欢这样的想法，即他们最初的培训是在远不理想的腐败支持下进行的，他们本可以在其他方向增加更多价值的想法
People might not like the idea that their original training was in the presence of far less than ideal corruption out support, the idea they could have added more value in other directions
不理想的童年是影响现在和未来成功的因素
Childhood that is was less than ideal factors into present and future success
PartyA 和 PartyB 是在压迫性政权帝国中长大的孩子。 甲方和乙方的经历和培训截然不同。 系统以不同的方式向甲方和乙方传递不公平。 未来被推销到零摩擦的可能性。
PartyA and PartyB are children that grow up in an Oppressive Regime Empire. PartyA and PartyB have vastly different experiences and training. The system delivers unfair to PartyA and PartyB in different ways. The future gets upsold to zero potential for friction.
现在可以变得舒适可以导致混淆的观点，这可能导致积极的变化被阻止。 看到的愿望并不总是理想的，世界并不总是美好的，看到你关心的系统中的腐败并不总是令人愉快、鼓舞人心、没有问题的可能性。 看到腐败很难，有时必须寻找腐败，而寻找腐败可能是危险的。
Present can become comfortable can lead to Obfuscated view that could lead to positive change prevented. Desire to see not always ideally amped, world not all pretty in, seeing corruption in a system you care about is not always enjoyable, inspiring, potential for problems free. Seeing corruption is hard, has to be looked for at times, and looking for that corruption can be dangerous.
可见性、真实性、更少的相关性限制、更少压迫的更美好未来被视为与人性相关的理想放大器，而不是真正的价值。
Visibility, Truth, Less Relevance Limiting, a Better Future with less oppression seen as amps ideally with humanity not true value in.
My Tech Blog 