Requirement

Requirement to be all value added

has potential to lead to no value added

People are limited value added, spending time on A is not spending time on B or C

Telling people they have to be ideal value for A, B, and C at same time can lead to zero value added to A, B, and C

Easy to get Engineers to believe that just because they don’t add value to B and C value added to A does not matter, just because they don’t add value to A and C value added to B does not matter, just because they don’t add value to A and B value added to C does not matter

Requirement to be value added to many systems at once can limit throughput for A, B, and C

Not to mention D,E,F,G

This post is not all ideal value added for all

Ideal value added such as a system with no injustice is only ideal for a while, not fielding tasks for a long time can lead to inability to field tasks, and excessive tasks required to be field can lead to long term divests

Cat that shits on floor every 6 months

Cat that shits on floor every day

Every 6 months, rare occurrence cleaning up less of a big deal, every day, let them in the house?

Excessive tests can be turned up because people NEED to field tasks to be VALUE ADDED

Iffy tests where you get blamed, you chose to help A but you didn’t think about B and C or even consider D,E,F, and G

Iffy tests where you get blamed, you chose to help B but you didn’t think about A and C or even consider D,E,F, and G

Iffy tests where you get blamed, you chose to help C but you didn’t think about A and B or even consider D,E,F, and G

Negate Optimal Amplification of Support Ideally Possible in Unjust System

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/injustice

Choose A blamed for B, Choose B blamed for A is perfect cover for not all C fixed

Saying Yes and saying No are options, Options that have potential to allow those asking questions to control paths, Questions Evoke Process