October 24th, 2022 Pt 2

Associations for different people are built in different ways over time, expect things add up in same way for others that had different access to content based on different interests?

Different Compare and Contrast Training, Different Priorities, Different Categorize and Classify

Support for Questions Turned Up In High Contrast Non Ideal Way in 2022 likely many years in the past as well, Questions and Comprehension support seen as adequate likely will fail to deliver in Not Fully Appreciated Ways, Requirement to Turn Up Contrast to Increase Probability of Answers does not always equal Problem Solving Contrast enabled with less Logical Fallacies, Pressure to turn up support in Non Ideal Ways does not always lead to increased Power, that is Accurate and Clarifying. Pressure might move from 2+2=? to 2+2=-10 to 10, not really all ideal for getting to 2+2=4.

World likes to throw curveballs, curveballs with potential to waste time and block support, Not Factoring that into reality Unwise, High Potential for Woe

I can comprehend my iffy Paradoxical puzzle piece a little better, does not equal I comprehend it Ideally better

People required to understand everything ideal? Musicians in Orchestra required to know what was going on in everyone in the Orchestra during the same performance? Will fail to deliver

Man in the audience sees things a different way? Percussion thinks differently than Trumpets?

Add in Shifting ground people can’t fully comprehend?

The Football Stadium Not the Orchestra Hall? Location Data based on Expectation, always ideal?

People need to line up puzzle pieces in ideal way, people seen as were promoted to line up puzzle pieces in ideal way will fail to deliver comprehension, more comprehension does not always equal less comprehended as less resolution

I have better question support in one direction that others do not have, and I am being prevented from enabling it ideally, likely similar for many on earth

People create walls, walls for dialogue, limiting dialogue in non ideal ways that can prevent comprehension in Not Fully Appreciated Ways

That Answer Really Matters to me can’t be turned up Non Ideally in Non Ideal Ways at Non Ideal Times?

Inspiring Better Communication, Bridging Dialogue and Divides in fields is Not A Given and can be High Value Added, people able to appreciate each other more, people that appreciate New Conversation and Defer Judgment are Not Always a Given

Just able to Listen myself, and Just able to communicate to others is Not Truly Sufficient Support for the world. Others seen as don’t need help at times communicating more ideally has failed to deliver in the past. Communication training for the future matters, Not in Always Fully Appreciated Ways.

People that bridge thinking the best of each other is not a given truth not by default. Risk mitigation is useful, Legalism a bit of the default setting. Lighter and Breezier right can be higher value added at times for More Ideal Results.

Encouraged people more likely to work together, more likely to work together in ways that enable water bottles and supplies. People with more water and supplies likely to have better support for actual logic and less missing puzzle pieces.

Rendering One Video on Samsung FE20 Phone and One Video on Samsung S7+ Tablet at the same time both using VideoMaker App, not appreciating costs incurred for multitasking and switching prioritization seems unwise

Having support limited can lead to forgotten puzzle pieces never enabled, enabling support in advance higher potential for access to content that might be turned off in non ideal ways not fully appreciated

Potential for Many Puzzle Pieces to All be turned on at once that can lead to not fully comprehended Epiphanies

15 paths of Gold all turned on at once?

Key Details and Summarization Support, Numbers Support Not Trained can lead to Key Details Missed in Non Ideal Ways at Non Ideal Times, More Training does not equal always perceives Number presented incorrectly, Numbers Support Seen as Ideal a Little More Rounding than I think is True Value Amplified 90% of people useful for example know that

Just because I can add and summarize correctly at at 75% rate does not equal I won’t depend on others with 25% rate

75% is a vague approximation does not equal the point is not important does not equal numbers required for example are always ideal not arbitrarily set

could have said 90% and 10% more distance not always better, not always worse

Rounded numbers for relevance limiting and example are in by design

Glass is half full is a useful system

If I say is the glass 40% full or 60% full is useful to clarify the glass could be half full might not be half full does not equal 40% and 60% aren’t set by me based on non ideal support

How likely is that to be a problem? Possibly 90%, not fully appreciated? Not Fully Pondered?

Non Ideal Numbers Arbitrarily Set for Example Factor into Questions and Answers, Relevance Enabling and Limiting in Not Fully Appreciated Ways. Upsold to arbitrary not all ideal, not acknowledging their arbitrary nature not all ideal.

Listening to this while writing