October 21st, 2022 Pt 2

Relevance limiting and inconsistent systems in by design do not lead to ideal conditions for projecting risk

Inconsistent Numbers and Data does not equal no requirement to make choices for Risk Mitigation based on Inconsistent Numbers and Data

Projections based on Non Ideals Upsold to Best Choice Not All True Value Amplified

Reduced Data Consistency Support combined with continued need to Mitigate Risk does not always lead to ideal projections

Potential for having to make decisions on 60% 40% decisions where the numbers are actually generated based on non ideal data and non ideal system design

Thoughts of Eye in the Sky

Insufficient Data leads to War Time Choices, Peace High Value Added, Peacemaking High Value Added in Not Fully Appreciated Ways, negate consistent numbers support is not all less non ideal death amplified

Wrongs Righted Throughput Set to Will Be Ideal, Not All True Value In

System Less than Ideal Likely to be Upsold to Ideal Non Ideally

Inefficient Urine Out By Design can be Non Ideally Turned Up, High Disrespect Urine In By Design can be Non Ideally Turned Up, Golden showers of Doom set to cannot be turned up in Not Fully Appreciated Ways would be unwise

System as Optimal Urine Out as Optimal Urine In can be Non Ideally Limited in Not Fully Appreciated Ways

Suboptimal Access to Alcohol and Aspirin can be turned up in Non Ideal Ways Not Fully Appreciated, Comprehension of Statement set to more than limited would be unwise

Alcohol can thin blood, Aspirin can thin blood, potential possibilities for non ideals with plaque in arteries?