Divest

LTV-ReqInv-DivLim-FHEinNIW

真正有价值的生活需要投资撤资，以限制自由、希望和非理想方式的鼓励

Life Truly Valued Requires Investing in Divestment from Limiting Freedom, Hope, and Encouragement in Non Ideal Ways

数学、科学和物理因素影响消息吞吐量、吞吐量、覆盖范围、网络得到充分认可，而不是给定的

Math, Science, and Physics factors into Message Throughput, Throughput, Reach, Network Fully Appreciated, Not a Given

观众持有宝石 -> 容易认为演讲者是观众理解的宝石，是闪闪发光的宝石

Audience Holds the Gem -> Easy to think the Speaker is the Gem over Audience Comprehension is the Gem that Sparkles

观众是未来，我是观众的一部分，我自己的信息需要考虑，我们可能会在以后以理想或非理想的方式向我们重播我们的信息和文字

The Audience is the Future, I am part of the Audience for my own message something to consider, we might have our message and words replayed to us at a later time in ideal or non ideal ways

如果我在观众席中，并且我是，我希望默认情况下放入水瓶，默认情况下使用浴室

If I were in the Audience, and I am, I would want water bottles in by default, access to bathrooms in by default

更容易不评论观众需要理解和信息支持这一事实

Easier to not comment on the fact Audience needs Support for Comprehension and Message to Sparkle

被视为一维的利润并不是所有的附加值，利润是金钱还是利润是增加了有效的信息输出？

Profit seen as one dimensional is not all value added, Profit is Money or Profit is Increased Effective Message Output?

如果我今年可以少付 1000 美元，这将使有人活得快死，我会同意吗？如果我的工资是 20,000 美元、40,000 美元、50,000 美元、80,000 美元或 100,000 美元？

If I could be payed $1000 less this year and that would enable someone living over dying, would I agree? If my salary was $20,000, $40,000, $50,000, $80,000, or $100,000?

有人活着只是为了被闪亮的蓝色大理石折磨吗？世界和时间并不总是增值的

Someone living just to be tortured by Shiny Blue Marble? The World and Time is Not Always Value Added

通过设计排除我自己的贪婪、竞争和邪恶是不明智的，人们并不完美，我并不完美，承认任何更少都是不明智的

Factoring out my own Greed, Competition, and Evil In By Design would be Unwise, People are Not Perfect, I am Not Perfect, Acknowledging any less would be Unwise

真理、和平和生命并不总是被重视，导致不舒服的实现的数字并不总是被充分欣赏，因为它们从舒适变成了不舒服

Truth, Peace, and Life is Not Always Valued, Numbers that lead to Uncomfortable Realization are Not Always Fully Appreciated because they turn Comfortable to Uncomfortable

稍微改变初始条件？生活在树林里，年收入 1000 美元，捐出 19000 美元来拯救生命？

Change the initial conditions a little? Live in woods off $1000 a year and give $19000 to saving life?

很容易忘记的事情，即使我给了 19000 美元，也不能保证它会被永久使用，当我在树林里时，其他人也会给 19000 美元来帮助我。

Something easy to forget, even if I give $19000, there is no guarantee it will be used for good, that others would give $19000 as well to help me while I am in the woods.

因此，如果我向一个系统提供 19000 美元，该系统以腐败的方式获取并使用它以非理想方式压迫人们，我实际上是在放大还是损害系统？决策制定中的便利和贪婪因素，不想查看决策制定中的数字因素。

Thus if I give $19000 to a system that takes and uses that in a corrupt way to oppress people in Non Ideal ways, am I actually amplifying or hurting the system? Convenience and Greed factors into Decision Making, not wanting to look at the numbers factors into Decision Making.

社会中有些人给予，以积极的方式帮助彼此放大，以更理想的方式帮助放大和平与恩典。理想的方式并不总是容易理解或容易从 Evil In By Design 中提取出来。

The are some in society that give, that help amplify each other in positive ways, help amplify peace and grace in more ideal ways. Ideal Ways are not always easy to comprehend or easy to extract from Evil In By Design.

现在想象一下，我只给了 19000 美元，然后走进树林。 365天的单词可以用来放大设置到一棵树上没有人听到的树林里？ $19000 或 Words，哪一个更可能导致生命和恩典被放大？金钱并不总是更少的毒品，酒后驾车，驾驶悬崖放大。

Now imagine I just give $19000 and go in the woods. 365 Days of Words that could be used to amplify set to a tree that falls in the woods that nobody hears? $19000 or Words, which one is more likely to lead to life and grace amplified? Money is not always Less Drugs, Drinking and Driving, Driving Off Cliffs Amplified.

人类只需要在一个方向上实现利润最大化以实现更有效的世界的想法在最好的情况下似乎是不明智的，在最坏的情况下是犯罪。

The idea humans only have to maximize profit in one direction to enable a more effective world seems unwise at best criminal at worst.

没有灵感而受到鼓励的艺术家可能会导致更少的灵感，因此更少的鼓励，被视为简单，容易，磨坊，并非所有增值

Artists Encouraged without Inspired can lead to less Inspired and thus less Encouraged, seen as simple, easy, run of the mill, not all value added

艺术家受压迫或未受压迫影响有效信息输出、获得水瓶的能力和有用的逻辑

Artists oppressed or not oppressed factors into Effective Message Output, ability to have access to Water Bottles and Useful Logic

金钱、有效的信息输出、鼓励和启发是四个维度，四个维度不是数学、学习、教学、希望、验证、尊重等……人类被视为只需要在一个维度上最大化利润，或者二维似乎是不明智的。有点假二分法。

Money, Effective Message Output, Encouragement, and Inspiration are four dimensions, four dimensions that aren’t Math, Learning, Teaching, Hope, Validation, Respect, Etc…. Humans seen as only having to Maximize Profit in One Dimension, or Two Dimensions seems unwise. A bit of a False Dichotomy.

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/dichotomy

所有事物都成为好与坏、对与错的因素并不能以正确的方式充分放大复杂性。所有事情都会影响好与坏、对与错，有时确实会给出一个清晰的观点，因为我们都必须根据有限的分辨率做出决定。

All things factor into Good and Bad, Right and Wrong does not fully amplify complexity in a correct way. All things factor into Good and Bad, Right and Wrong does give a clarifying view at times, as we all have to make decisions based upon limited resolution.

战争是坏的，和平是好的 -> 简单，可重用，重要 -> 但是世界一次又一次地知道这一点而进入战争，因此“战争是坏的，和平是好的”的陈述对于问题集是否足够复杂？

War is Bad, Peace is Good -> Simple, Reusable, Important -> yet time and time again the world goes to War knowing this, thus is the statement “War is Bad, Peace is Good” sufficiently complex for the problem set?

有时必须以另一种方式放大信息，这可能更有用，也可能不更有用

Sometimes message has to be amplified in another way, that might or might not be more useful

只是一条可爱的小龙，他不会伤害任何人

Just a cute little dragon he’s not going to hurt anyone

高价值水瓶观众注意事项

Reminder for Audience Water Bottles High Value In

提醒观众我希望他们健康、充满活力、充满力量，我不想根据有限的分辨率来评判他们。

Reminder to Audience I want them healthy, energized, empowered and I don’t want to judge them based on limited resolution High Value In

Reminder to Audience I value their Feedback Upfront, High Value In

建立相关性有时需要时间，时间损失并不总是得到充分重视，时间损失并不总是得到充分重视并不总是增值

Establishing Relevance sometimes takes Time, Time Losses are Not Always Fully Appreciated, Upsold to Time Losses is Not Always Fully Appreciated is Not Always Value Added

观众在您的视频上按下“播放”，被视为一种神圣的信任，是一种选择性的史诗般的购买，时间并不总是得到保证？

The audience pressing Play on your video, seen as a sacred trust, as a selective epic purchase with time that is not always guaranteed?

重视沟通有价值重视沟通有价值不一定要完善

There is value in valuing communication, there is value in valuing communication does not have to be perfected

言语不完美的人可以挽救你的生命吗？最好让他们害怕在默认情况下进行更新？

People with imperfect words that could save your life? Better for them to be too afraid to make updates In By Default?

恩典和感谢更新，鼓舞人心的话语可以放大的不仅仅是提醒人们并不完美，被困在一个慢慢恶化的身体中，并不总是得到朋友、家人和世界的全力支持

Grace and Appreciation for updates, Encouraging Words can amplify more than reminders people are not perfect, are stuck in a body that is slowly deteriorating and that is not always fully supported by friends, family, and the world

观察技能被认为是给定的，不能不明智地放大，有能力的读者和观众可以更充分地欣赏故事，还是默认情况下缺乏足够想象力的限制？

Observation skills seen as given, unable to be amplified unwise, Empowered Reader and Audience member that can more fully appreciate the story or one that is limited without enough Imagination in by default?