DRIBD CNSOS -> RIBD CPSIS
不尊重设计组合负支持系统 尊重系统设计组合正支持
Disrespect In By Design Combinational Negative Support Out System to Respect In By Design Combinational Positive Support In System
默认情况下，当前系统的价值较低未得到充分认可
Current System to Less Value by Default Not Fully Appreciated
投资数学课是增值而不是 100% 增值
Investing in Math Lessons is Value Added Not 100% Value Added
Unforgiveness and Grace Out By Design Teaches a Lesson, Expectation and You Wronged Me is Higher Value Added than making Peace Immediately, Adding Support and Training, If Can’t Fix that is a Trained System, People are likely to Reflect what they have learned
People that make mistakes are not always forgiven, thus Judgment Iffy systems can be used to gauge level of trust, value added
Hypothetical if fake Character did X would you do Y or would you do Z? Expectation factors into training in non ideal ways, hypothetical does not even have to be presented to other parties
Person A has done B in the past therefor C is only logical conclusion therefor course of action is D
Whether B has been done or not whether A was trained correctly is inconsequential to the projection of C and D
Whether the data was consistent or not considered irrelevant to enabling support, Water Bottles Out By Design changes ability to factor in more relevant information in truly meaningful ways
If Unreasonable Demands are all that deliver results, Unreasonable Demands will be made regardless if those Demands are Reasonable or Not Reasonable
What gets results matters, if better words gets results, better words will be valued, if correct numbers 2+2=4 gets results, better numbers will be valued. Important to remind people Humans have a tendency to forget that one case does not lead to ideal for all cases.
Systems and Projections are adopted in Non Ideal Ways that lead to Non Ideal Support at Non Ideal Times
真相、谎言、支持 足够的对比不需要
Truth, Lies, Support Adequate Not Required for Contrast
导致基本属性 完成工作所需的对比度并不总是能以理想的方式完成工作
Leads to a fundamental property Contrast required to get the job done does not always get the job done ideally
故事中的真相或否定真相不是手头的问题，故事将如何影响重视故事的观众
Truth or Negate Truth in the Story not the Question at hand, how the story will effect the audience valued over the story
判断训练更多判断还是建立在有用的品质上，刀片就是刀片？
Judgmental train more Judgement or build on a useful quality, a blade is a blade?
人们倾向于不检查门口的判断，人们倾向于不尝试并首先理解
People tendency to not Check Judgment at Door, People tendency to not Try and First Understand
如果你不能通过不断的恳求来对抗潮流？
If you can’t fight the flow via constant pleading work with it?
人们说他们关心爱和恩典，教会声称出现了爱、恩典和宽恕，然后似乎放大了不宽恕和支持
People say they care about Love and Grace in, The Church claims to turn up Love, Grace, and Forgiveness, then seems to amplify Unforgiveness and Support Out Instead
基于有限分辨率和不良培训的惩罚比真相和增加支持更有价值
Punishment based on Limited Resolution and Poor Training is valued over Truth and Adding Support
为教会祈祷和支持会导致祈祷得到回应或祈祷未得到回应吗，对教会的祈祷和支持会导致系统中更多的宽恕和恩典，还是会导致系统中的宽恕和恩典减少，祈祷和支持教会会导致 设计中的更多真相和答案，还是设计中的更少真相和答案？
Do Prayers and Support for The Church lead to prayers answered or to prayers unanswered, Do Prayers and Support for The Church lead to more forgiveness and grace in the system or less forgiveness and grace in the system, Do Prayers and Support for The Church lead to more Truth and Answers In By Design, or less Truth and Answers In By Design?
由无限上帝驱动的系统无法提供更多 In By Design？ 就像上帝应该在太阳前有一个巨大的放大镜，它产生惊人的圣光并提供失败的支撑线
A system powered by an Infinite God can’t deliver more In By Design? It is like God is supposed to have a giant magnifying glass in front of the sun that yields amazing holy light and delivers failed support lines instead
证据在布丁里？
Proof is in the Pudding?
善意的人使用对比和语言来传达他们的观点，善意并不等于考虑所有相关信息，而不是混淆焦点以更有利地带来清晰
People meaning well use contrast and language to communicate their point, meaning well does not equal factoring in all relevant information, not obfuscating focus to bring clarity in a more favorable light
提出论点需要建立相关性，建立的两方之间的相关性不等于建立的各方之间的相关性
Making an argument requires relevance established, relevance between two parties established does not equal relevance between all parties established
A ManB creates a story, a product in Story name is similar to companyA, AudienceMemberC listens to story
B is trying to create a memorable story for audience C does not equal there is no side effect for companyA
If I draw Hypotheticals I likely need a Hypothetical Name, say VarA might lead people to think Amy, Amber, Aaron, Arnold. Using a name like Amy or Arnold is less obtrusive to the Story does not equal it is less obtrusive to Amy or Arnold.
If I say Amy went to the story. People are likely to think about people they know named Amy going to a store, or the form version of a store they know in their mind. If I say convenient store, changes the story, if I say grocery store, it changes the story, if I say market by the sea, changes the story.
Does it Matter that I don’t know anyone named Amy that went to the store? People sometimes look for hidden meaning, specially when they are searching for answers, a bit of a non ideal quality that isn’t turned down via foreshadowing, motifs, themes, and symbols.
If I say the man died. It doesn’t matter that no mad died, it evokes thoughts, possibly thoughts of recent funerals. It evokes different thoughts in different listeners. Words are a bit of vagueness unpredictability in by design. Comprehension thought to be 100% unwise. A lot of Grace Required In By Design for Storytelling, does not equal 3rd parties are always given appropriate level of Grace. Telling the Story many times valued over Inspiring the Grace Required for Hearing the Story.
A story about a man dying walking on a sidewalk might make the reader or listener not walk on the sidewalk, be scared to walk on the sidewalk, does not equal someone actually died on the sidewalk, does not equal there is a good reason to fear walking on the sidewalk. Fear does not make reasonable demands.
Fear plays on irrational. Such as slippery slope arguments, walking on the sidewalk will inevitably lead to a trip, a fall, and run over by a car. Factoring Fear in over God In By Design unwise. Factoring Fear, Worry in over God In By Design unwise. God set to always delivers in a timely fashion unwise, God always delivers prepare for anything?
The combination is a bit more than non ideal
Shallow, Deep, Not Enough Sparkles Not All Value Added
Distinct Lack of Appreciation for Diagrams
October Diagram Appreciation Month?
Diagram Part Story and Part Art that requires Focus and Non Null Time Costs for Writing as well as Non Null Time Costs for Reading
Skill Reallocation Algorithm?
Current Administration to “Bad as Bad as Bad as Can Be”?
A Little Bird Leading the Charge?
נקודה קריטית שבה התמיכה בחוץ גדולה יותר מהתמיכה בפנים, באמת לחכות כל כך הרבה זמן או להעיף את המושחתים מהמשרד מיד?
Critical Point ที่ Support Out มากกว่า Support จริงๆ แล้วรอนานขนาดนั้นหรือโยนคอรัปชั่นออกจากตำแหน่งทันที?
महत्वपूर्ण बिंदु जहां समर्थन समर्थन से अधिक है, वास्तव में इतना लंबा इंतजार करें या भ्रष्ट को तुरंत कार्यालय से बाहर कर दें?
Punto critico in cui il supporto è maggiore del supporto, aspettare davvero così a lungo o buttare via immediatamente il corrotto dall’ufficio?
Titik kritis dimana dukungan kaluar langkung ageung tibatan dukungan, leres-leres ngantosan lami atanapi langsung ngalungkeun koruptor ti kantor?
支持大于支持的临界点，真的等待那么久还是立即将腐败者赶下台？
외부의 지지가 내부의 지지보다 더 큰 크리티컬 포인트, 정말로 그렇게 오래 기다릴 것인가 아니면 부패한 사람을 즉시 퇴출시킬 것인가?
サポートアウトがサポートインよりも大きいクリティカルポイント、本当にそれを待つか、すぐに腐敗したオフィスを追い出しますか?
Critical Point where support out is greater than support in, really wait that long or throw the corrupt out of office immediately?
Impeach as a Momentum Storm? Challenges per second increased increase potential for current administration to be thrown off king of the hill? Corrupt Value Politicians in Not All Value Added
Good Respectful Questions for People getting the Corrupt Out, Time Lag Throughput Limited to 0 for all others?
Throughput Limited to 0 might create a safety problem, what has been done to me unwise to do to others
0 Throughput leads to a different channel chosen, greatly reduced throughput can lead to still using right up to out of office
Dependent on support is useful until it is not, kind of what the current administration is teaching, might not be wise to reamplify
Current system is teaching relying on support leads to woe, moving to a system that teaches support is value added?
Support the people robbing water bottles in by design? Or limit their support to bare essentials? We need to facilitate and inspire positive change
通过支持机制来促进积极的变化，而不会让人们因设计而受到伤害
Facilitating Positive Change through Support Out Mechanisms Without Getting People Hurt In By Design
通过制裁限制我支持的人可能会对阻止我的人做同样的事情
People limiting my support through Sanctions are likely to do the same to those blocking me
被视为一致的事情，需要在所有这些中加起来，不明智
Things seen as Consistent, Required to Add Up In All This, Unwise
没有弹劾的人正在死去的潜力 被弹劾的人死去的潜力
Potential for people are dying without Impeachment potential for people dying with Impeachment
华盛顿特区无法提供真正的支持，因为在设计系统中价值较低
Washington DC that can’t deliver real support as less value In By Design System
100 万人死于现任政府还是 100,000 人死于新政府？
1 Million People die with Current Administration or 100,000 die with New Administration?
政府也许能够给出预测，但不确定他们是否应该相信这些数字
Government might be able to give projections, not sure they should be trusted with the numbers
Pieces of Cheesecake while I go without Water Bottles?
Lag not good enough.
My Tech Blog 