Thoughts on Maximizing Profit, Maximizing ROI
Last number less than this number
System leads to A > B, then system that leads to A
System leads to B > A, then system that leads to B
Factors that factor into A and B
Not guarantees that same factors will factor into A and B
A = C+D+E
B = C+F+G
Knowns and Unknowns, C could factor into A and B differently
A could equal 5C and B could equal 0.5C
B could equal 10C and A could equal 0.25C
Different people can use investments to different amounts
One math lesson, might be more value into one person Art lesson might be more value into another person
Idea that one less is more value than the other not always easy or wise system
One artist that inspires 50 doctors, or 51 doctors that quit early?
Unwise to discount encouragement and discouragement into systems
Raising Volume, Quantity does not always lead to higher profit
Kind of like Encouragement, 20 Nice comments might be valued less than a few amazing ones
Encouragement is a Non Null Time Cost, robbed of all time is not encouraging
Giant open outdoor picture or drone shot, or words of encouragement, one always better than the other?
Allowed to get away with being High Discouragement in, is High Discouragement in
Oppressive systems words of encouragement fall short of what they could be
Potential NAFA NAVI
Simple Charming Details with Massive Encompassing Scale that transports us to a new world and journey?
Positive Reaffirming Details are always better than Compare and Contrast for effective delivery of Message? 90% of all people value that > than 10%?
Corrupt Leadership of SSI and UBI Out > Long Term No Support in for Country? Have to stick it to 2020 to 2024 for the good of the world? Not sure children of this time period, people of this time period really appreciate current leader….
Democrats Epic in Negate Support to a permanently disabled party of higher value in, less corrupt party system in permanently out the better, Republicans aren’t really delivering support either, not sure what to do when all leadership fails like a crooked 3 dollar bill full of Ginger haters
Permanent Associations of Political Parties to Shit Storms not all value in for Long Term Unrepairable Label Promoters Out, problem is that has given non ideal cloud cover for leadership to profit from in non ideal ways, non ideal ways that has lead to deaths NFA, to reduced Ginger Support Not Always Full Appreciated
Long Term Ginger Support Out, kind of eating shit in
Bad Output Should Not Be Filtered into Input
Listen, Apologize, I think it important to send a message, Thank because I don’t have to say this, and not sure we should give solve to the people that have left the support out eat shit in by design
Democrats and Republicans to shitty output, Green Party and reduced toilet paper on par with what was given in Jail seems more ideal for government systems that turn up fails and support out time and time again, not very merciful turning off support, leadership should teach better lessons
Protectors of Freedom of Speech and valued pursuers of ideals to help save the world from Evils Not Always Fully Appreciated -> what politicians could have been labeled as
Ginger Hating Toilet Paper Thieves seems more apt
Time Period of the Wrong Not Always Fully Appreciated
Potential for Strengthening Arguments Past Safe NFA-NFR
Potential for Better Sold as More Optimal Not Actually More Optimal?
Said with no emotional element, message fully heard and appreciated?
Callused cold, emotionless not always perceived as more loving, rightly so and wrongly so
Proof is incentivized to be non emotional, non reactionary, responsive
Responsive that is still warm not always easy to get right
Concern and motivation for positive, still providing for our own personal dreams and motivations, and protecting without bias to not always a simple system
If we could say without any bias, would that be more value in?
Thought others don’t value our joy at all to all value in?
If we show any bias they will attach us to a guillotine and cut the rope?
Trust someone with no bias?
The man lives or dies, the facts are A+B+C
Not the most effective of arguments, acknowledging there is bias in the system by design is not always fully appreciated, likely to not always fully be appreciated
Getting people to be biased in the right ways is not always a value in system, left out is not always a value in system
Two bottles of soda in a fridge, open the fridge door and can’t decide, society will judge me dependent on the choice Not Always Fully Appreciated
Society likes Contrast -> Coke registered as Republican Cocaine, Not Fully Appreciated the way the system rolls at times
Sprite -> Green Party no toilet paper in?
Contrast creates real problems for decision making in, no bias creates real problems for decision making in, not all bias is good, does not equal all choices is bad
Judgement is in by design and used in inappropriate ways to control and oppress
System goes through all the work to make messages and fails to allow and a lot room for biases built in
Easy to be biased, easy to be unfair about judging people for bias, easy to be biased about bias, not always bad to be biased about bias, bias has lead to deaths and losses in the system not fully appreciated and turned up over time, reprocessed and reamplified overtime
Arguments are valuable for saving life or losing life
Win a trial > lose a trial, does not always work out in all ideal ways for the one that loses the trial
Competition In By Design leads to trophies, salaries
Trophies, Salaries does not always lead to accurate level of support
TS-DNAL2-AccLoS
Win the trial but lose the war?
Can effectively prove point might lead to more thinks should defend point
Directing others path is not always value in
Doctor or Architect? No Hospitals, Hospital with bad Fire Codes always better?
Shelter and Operating Rooms leads to better ability for Doctors to deliver effectively, sick people to healthy leads to more funding for keeping food on Architects tables
Lawyers and Artists left to eat out of dumpsters? Possibly a better way?
Arguments as No Lose likely sell better but are more unrealistic
Unrealistic Idealism can lead to won elections that can but does not always lead to better ability to deliver for people
Promises built on idealism can lead to suboptimal support for parties not always fully predicted
Green Power Less War > Keeping SSI Working and Gingers Alive
Pet Project Promises Earmarks in Bills > actually delivering support
Toilet Paper for DC > Texan’s Ability to Purchase Bottle of Waters -> to a less fully appreciated system by Gingers with gasoline level fire
Less Water for Texans, Less Water for Gingers -> turned up overtime potentially via mislabels and hatred of Bush after 9/11 overswing
Burning to death in a collapsing building likely had large impact on leadership, trying to increase education and that happened under watch to likely need to overcompensate in not fully appreciated ways with a big Evil In By Design puzzle piece God has left in over time
Easy to think Evil In By Design doesn’t effect our decision making, and Bias is required to make decisions
Strengthening Arguments can lead to non ideals with bias
Bias required, Bias can be raised in Non Ideal Ways that are unexpected and not always fully appreciated
Lawyer to family members (nation viewed as family worth personally protecting) dying
Words, Arguments to less adequate remedies for problems is not always value in
Tendency for world governments to think, words have been inadequate more actions like sanctions, war, intervention is always more value in than peace and moving forward
Making peace is a non null cost, but not all want to actually take the burden of peacemaking, some deaths some problems in society are view as less important than the greater amount of deaths caused by Evil In By Design with High Potential for Overswing and inability to predict the future
Gasoline poured on half of your body, and lit on fire
Scars we can’t fully appreciate always on display for the world to see
Likely effects all decision making, Vanilla Sky, Tyrant
Easy to judge if it happened to me I would do it different, if it happened to me I would have had the strength to do it different
Bias raised in Non Ideal Ways does not always factor into Leadership in Ideal Ways
Systems are strengthened for leadership, Flex is sometimes viewed as less valuable than power. Underfunded teachers flexible vs Teachers need raised 2+2=4 Matters to system in Not Always Fully Appreciated Ways
Potential for people taught 2+2 = something else than 4, potential to cause real problems in the system, if 4 equals guilty on the document, data consistency problems are not always fully respected
Down chain does not always equal something wasn’t switched further up the chain
A -> B -> C -> D -> E
A = 7
E will show A = 7?
What if B sets A to = 4
2+2 = 4 simple as that?
Document said 2+2 = 7 (Might have been flagging something for higher up the chain), might be a way to test data consistency, will well meaning employees modify reports or will they deliver the image shown at the ground level directly
Tested Data Consistency in can be incentivized and disincentivized for good reason
Just because that 2+2 = 7 was left in tact, does not mean the rest of the report was necessarily left in tact, that it would not have been changed at the last second through non ideals in the systems like health problems or neural links (early stage cybernetics maybe not always fully appreciated in leadership)
Expectation of Knowns in a World Full of Technology and a Lot of Reason to Hide things is Not All Value In
People required to operate on knowns to strengthen support that leads to a higher quality of life, operating on knowns does not always lead to optimal support for all parties
The idea is power to prove argument beats the alternative, does not equal there is no potential for that power to be used in non ideal ways by bad actors
Evil In By Design, Need to be Right, Need to be Right to solidify support lines is not all value in to decision making
Alternative not all value in either, 7 people to feed, 2+2 = quota for week, tell them we will be able to provide? Unrealistic expectations of support in is not always value in for decision making, not making decision based on numbers and logic? God will provide no need to go to market, not an all value in for respect system
5 % Gas Left as Norm leads to Higher Quality Output? Too Comfortable leads to razor thin margins that fail in suboptimal ways at suboptimal times?
Teaches a lesson that giving is not always fully respected or appreciated by man, God likely has better memory of the numbers
Too Comfortable set to a system worth valuing out is not always value in
And it can be amplitatory
Uncomfortable for me useful to get results seen as Kosher, can lead to uncomfortable for others useful to get results
UncIBD -> a useful system for turning me up -> a useful system for turning them up -> a system that can turn it up in NAFA ways NAFR ways
Peace to War -> Comfortable to Uncomfortable is useful -> Getting comfortable with uncomfortable not an all value in system
War to Peace -> Uncomfortable Ginger Support Lines In By Design to never able to fuck over Ginger support lines again as a High Value In System
Governments allowed to remain in power while deoptimizing Ginger support -> to less valuable systems long term
People that truly want to make peace, don’t turn off my support
The problem with the system, the competition, can win leads to think should win
The problem with the system, knowing when to speak up not always simple
Strong rebuke to leadership -> likely have heard quite a few of those
Predicting wrong -> people have a tendency to that
Imagine mediating Imperfect Parents Talking in the Past about the Advice they would give their children
Easy to think they had visibility of the events of today way back then
Not sure what that is called
Updated overtime leads to Hubris that others were more updated had more information they did not have back then
Is there a word for that?
Discrepancy in Training that is Magnified over Time in Non Ideal Ways for Judgmental People, for people required to be Judgmental deliver on limited resolution?
Future has more information, rearview is 2020, rearview is thought to be 2020
Non ideal Linguistics modifications overtime, non ideal memory, unlikely to be able to fully remember how we were all trained at earlier dates
Easy to say training was non ideal, based on knowns we have while limiting visibility to unknowns that are in by design
Words can be condensed does not always equal words should be condensed
Life is a Limited Time Limited Memory Limited Resolution System that is Not Always Fully Appreciated and Not Always Fully Respected -> Life is but a Vapor
vs
Easy to say training was non ideal, based on knowns we have while limiting visibility to unknowns that are in by design
Life-LTLM-LRS
Easy to training was non ideal while limiting access to unknowns (unknowns that are magnified over time in non ideal ways)
Proof that is valuable to our argument is in by design
Proof that is less valuable to our argument is not always fully pondered, conjectured, theorized, implicated, associated, assumed, derived
Proof Valuable > Conjecture that Could Save Lives Not Always Fully Appreciated
Life can’t be summed up in concise one liners? “Since when” – Van Wilder
Life tendency to deliver on limited resolution proof valued greater than observation
Time is limited Observation takes time -> Observation a Not Always Fully Appreciated System that can be High Value In
TLim-ObsNNTCs-ObsNAFASys-TCB-HVI
Observation can lead to more information does not always lead to more information, potential for more unknowns in mind opened to new learning not all value out, computers have sensors for a reason
Expectation of Observation to always deliver perfect resolution more than not ideal
Leveraged Observation not always value in
Scientists with a guy with a gun standing over their shoulder when they look through the microscope, someone dies if no discovery?
Scientists know how to get oxygen does not equal scientist are always to be trusted
Scientist know how to mitigate does not equal scientist do not need oxygen, nor is it wise to leverage observation in non ideal ways
Demand for non ideal support lines can lead to non ideal support lines not fully appreciated
Requirement for delivery does not always lead to non biased delivery
Req2Delv-DNAL2-NBD
TLim-ObsNNTCs-ObsNAFASys-TCB-HVI-Req2Delv-DNAL2-NBD
Time Limited Observation Takes Time, Observation is Not Always a Fully Appreciated System that can be High Value In, Important to remind people though, Required to Deliver does not always lead to Non Biased Delivery, Non Biased Delivery is Not Always Value In
Time Variation in Results Delivered Not Always Fully Appreciated
NNTCsL2VarsNAFA
NNTCsL2VarsNAFA-TLim-ObsNNTCs-ObsNAFASys-TCB-HVI-Req2Delv-DNAL2-NBD-IBD
Non Null Time Costs Lead to Variables Not Always Fully Appreciated
Time Limited In By Design
Observation Requires Non Null Time Costs
Observation is Not Always a Fully Appreciated System that can be and has proven to be High Value In -> Cancer Research vs No Cancer Research, Looking in Microscope or Starting Wars? People Need Challenges, Including Scientists
Required to Deliver Does Not Always Lead to Non Biased Deliver In By Design
Shitty No Delivers In By Design currently expect better from the past would be an unwise assumption, high likelihood to limit the future in not fully respected ways
God that gets away with Snake In By Design
I fundamentally do not like the way God has run this planet
Is law really any value in when all inputs have been iffed?
Reality is veiled, potentially always veiled
Results value iffed
My Tech Blog 