Evil In By Design People Need Positive Challenges People Don’t Like Their Time Being Wasted
Evil In By Design Peacemaking Non Ideal Historic Track Record – WWI, WWII, Korean War, Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq, potential for China and Taiwan
EIBD-PNPC-PDNL-TTBW -> EIBD-PM-NI-HTR -> If we don’t learn from past doomed to repeat it
Learning from Past > Non Ideal Historic Track Record++
Learning from Past > Promoting Non Ideal Historic Track Record
LFP > Promo-NIHTR -> EIBD Not Enough Challenges Non Ideal Setup for Society
NEC-NIS4Soc
Early Divest Reasons from Challenges
Challenges have Buy In -> Can Fix that, can make that better, can change the world
Challenges have Divest Potential -> Can’t Fix that, brilliant minds from past couldn’t fix that what hope do I have?
CHBI-CHDP-CHP4EarlyDivestNFA-NFR
What makes for an interest sparking valuable challenge vs what makes for a challenge that is passed up for drugs, alcohol, starting wars, shooting guns all day?
Interest Sparking Challenge > Challenge Shelved
IntSpkCh > ChShlvd
IntSpkCh > NNTCs that are wasted and don’t empower my future
Non Null Time Costs that waste my time and don’t empower my future are shelved for more Interest Sparking Challenges
NNTCs-TWMT-&DNEmpF -> Shlvd
Results Matter, Empowerment Matters, Work today, for no food tomorrow? Not really an ideal setup
RMEmpM-WT-4NFT? NRIS-EIBD-PM-NI-HTR
RMEmpM -> For Challenge being Valued
Life is not always logical, doesn’t equal People are Not Generally Logical in their Choices
LinaL-DNE-PNGLogicIn
Logic Generally based on Knowns and Unknowns, logic can be optimized closer to real life if we know what those knowns and unknowns are, like when they type or when they talk, Non Null Investment in Faith, making comments, talking to world online
A = Likes Challenges
B = Does not like Drawing Flowers all Day Long
C = Where treasure is located at bottom of the ocean (Unknown, big ocean, limited resolution, diving is costly hard and not convenient)
A+B+C = Insight into how I use my time
If results and empowerment is limited such as working today for no increased potential for tomorrow
Might begin to think the formula is wrong
Cannot solidify working support lines, such as paint for my non flower drawings, potential to look into solutions that can solidify my support lines, like Impeachment
Politicians that wish to stay in office, generally need to deliver on Results Matter on delivering Working Supply Lines
Leadership maintained, results matter 2 delivering WSLs
TRP – Trustworthy Resilient Power
TRP-RM2-Delivering-WSL
TRP-RM2D-WSL
TRP-RM2D-WSL > TRP-RM2-Delivering-WSL
Efficiency In Characters Typed, Reduced Number of Non Null Time Costs at cost of Clarification
Clarification Not All Value In Obfuscation Not All Value In
Leadership that Delivers Challenges are Not Value In Challenges are Jading High Potential for Removed from Office
LTD-ChRNVI-ChRJade-NoResultsNoEmpowered-HP4-RFO
LTD-ChRNVI-ChRJade-NRNE-HP4-RFO
LTD – Leadership that Delivers, ChR – Challenges Are
NRNE -> HP4Shelved
No Results No Empowerment High Potential for Challenge Shelved
Leadership that does not provide empowering challenges Leadership that inspires empowering challenges become NRNE HP4-RFO
LTDNP – Leadership that does not provide
LTDNP-EmpCh-LTI-EmpCh-NRNE-HP4-RFO
LTI – Leadership That Inspires
What leadership Inspires Matters, What leadership fails to Inspire Matters
WLIMs-WLF2IMs
I reiterate what leadership inspires matters and what leadership fails to inspire matters
Leadership is currently inspiring results matter less and future is less empowered by challenges
I assert leaderships failure to deliver on working supply lines is high value out for feeling challenges add value and are empowering
IA-LF2D-WSL-HVO-Ch2-RDNM-FNE
Leadership of Results Do Not Matter – LofRDNM
Leadership of Future Not Empowering – LofFNE
LofRDNofFNE-HP4-RFO
LofRDNM -> Work 30 days for a paycheck, find out leadership bet company payroll on roulette table
Why is it so bad? Breach of Trust
Leadership is a sacred trust, a sacred trust currently being broken
LST-STCBB
Democrats to breakers of sacred trust of leadership
Democrats to future less empowering future of hard work matters less
Dems-2FLE-FofHWML
Future Dems Future Dems families rely on support lines established today, support lines that are limited by current Democrats
Current Democrats High Potential to Hurt their own People NFA-NFR
2022 年 6 月的民主党人和共和党人喜欢桌子上的锋利边缘，就像地板上的碎玻璃一样，结果不重要，为未来工作不值得
Democrats and Republicans in June 2022 like sharp edges on tables like broken glass on the floor like results don’t matter work for future is not value in
民主党人破坏人民的信任是不好的，民主党人破坏工作供应线更糟糕，为了更美好的明天需要更好的领导来提供工作供应线
Democrats breaking trust of the people is bad, Democrats destroying working supply lines is worse, better leadership that delivers working supply lines is required for a better tomorrow
DemsBT-Bad-DemsBSLsIn-Worse-RFOBetter-P4WSL-DrivesPositiveChange
民主党人破坏信任，民主党人在供应线中表现不佳，被免职 更好的供应线潜力推动了积极的变化
Democrats breaking trust, Democrats are bad supply lines in, removed from office better potential for working supply lines drives positive change
Dems Trust Out Dems BSLs Dems RFOBetter Others Greater Potential for Working Supply Lines
Dems-TOBSLsIn-OGP4-WSLs
其他关心不在办公室的人不好，其他有更大潜力在办公室外工作的供应线更糟糕，迅速撤除阻碍供应线的民主党人是未来的高价值尚未得到充分赞赏
Others that care out of office bad, others that have greater potential for working supply lines out of office is worse, Swift removal of Democrats that block supply lines are High Value In For Future Yet to Be Fully Appreciated
OTC-OOOB-OTHGP-4WSLs-OOOW-SwiftRemovalofDems-TBSLs-HVI4F-Y2BFA
OTC3OBad-OTHGP-4WSLs-3OWorse-SRD-TBSLs-HVI4F-Y2BFA
Dems-TOBSLsIn-OGP4-WSLs
DemsBT-Bad-DemsBSLsIn-Worse-RFOBetter-P4WSL-DrivesPositiveChange
OTC3OBad-OTHGP-4WSLs-3OWorse-SRD-TBSLs-HVI4F-Y2BFA
Dems-TOBSLsIn-OGP4-WSLs
DemsBT-Bad-DemsBSLsIn-Worse-RFOBetter-P4WSL-DrivesPositiveChange
OTC3OBad-OTHGP-4WSLs-3OWorse-SRD-TBSLs-HVI4F-Y2BFA
Dems-TOBSLsIn-OGP4-WSLs
DemsBT-Bad-DemsBSLsIn-Worse-RFOBetter-P4WSL-DrivesPositiveChange
OTC3OBad-OTHGP-4WSLs-3OWorse-SRD-TBSLs-HVI4F-Y2BFA
Dems-TOBSLsIn-OGP4-WSLs
DemsBT-Bad-DemsBSLsIn-Worse-RFOBetter-P4WSL-DrivesPositiveChange
Others that care out of office bad, others that have greater potential for working supply lines out of office is worse, Swift removal of Democrats that block supply lines are High Value In For Future Yet to Be Fully Appreciated
Democrats breaking trust, Democrats are bad supply lines in, removed from office better potential for working supply lines drives positive change
Democrats breaking trust of the people is bad, Democrats destroying working supply lines is worse, better leadership that delivers working supply lines is required for a better tomorrow
Democrats to future less empowering future of hard work matters lessDems-2FLE-FofHWML
OTC3OBad-OTHGP-4WSLs-3OWorse-SRD-TBSLs-HVI4F-Y2BFA
Dems-TOBSLsIn-OGP4-WSLs
DemsBT-Bad-DemsBSLsIn-Worse-RFOBetter-P4WSL-DrivesPositiveChange
I assert leaderships failure to deliver on working supply lines is high value out for feeling challenges add value and are empowering
IA-LF2D-WSL-HVO-Ch2-RDNM-FNE
I assert leaderships failure to deliver on working supply lines is high value out for feeling challenges add value and are empowering
Others that care out of office bad, others that have greater potential for working supply lines out of office is worse, Swift removal of Democrats that block supply lines are High Value In For Future Yet to Be Fully Appreciated
Democrats breaking trust, Democrats are bad supply lines in, removed from office better potential for working supply lines drives positive change
Democrats breaking trust of the people is bad, Democrats destroying working supply lines is worse, better leadership that delivers working supply lines is required for a better tomorrow
Quality not a guarantee
Context not a guarantee
Context Matters Quality Matters Context Matters to Quality
Discernment of Context Matters
Irrelevant information to more relevant information hard
Irrelevant information to more relevant information when data security and consistency is not guaranteed is harder
Quality Decision Making Equals Less Evil In By Design
Quality Decisions Made Do Not Always Equal Less Evil In By Design, does that mean the choice was not a quality decision?
QDM-DNAE-LEIBD-DTMTC-WNAQD?
Ethics -> Quality Decision Making is not in by design
QDM-NIBD -> to More -> Not Always a Simple System
Evil In By Design and Quality Decision Making Is Not In By Design to More is Not Always A Simple System
Ethics -> A System -> A System that requires a Non Null Training Cost
Multistage ethics not always easy to fully appreciate
If the motive is decision A leads to B+C+D and finally to E, the motive was for E but the motive looks like B
Like Punishment or Prosecuting, the immediate value not always the motive
Sinking ship
A = Patching hole
E = Can go to sleep on ship without being scared ship is going to sink
Immediate result of A is B = ship stops sinking
Where E is the actual motive, the ability to stay alive and go to sleep without the ship sinking
People might act in very logical ways that are non logical
Easy to expect people mean for B to happen rather than for E to happen
Punishment equals uncalled for non null time costs – B
Where E equals better Decision Making long term
Life is but a vapor, C+D can be Non Null Time Costs, Non Null Time Costs to a life this is potentially vapor, is not always ideal for leading to E
Punishment B is not always optimal for creating E
B set from = Punishment to B = Positive Challenges Earlier on in Life
B set from Punish to B = PCEonNLife
Could potentially lead to C = Better Long Term Decision Making Faster
PCEonNLife > Punishment NFA-NFR
A Video on Understanding and Optimizing Customer Service? A Positive Challenge Finding the Good and the Bad in this Video?
Think about the future
Listening to the environment, storm or no storm
Apologies – can mean peace or war, a knife in the back or no knife in the back
Solve – solving, able to fix a tire on the way through the dessert, or walking without enough water?
Thank – what is the value in a thank you, how does it value us, it reminds us of people need validation, there is reasons to value what it adds to us as well -> Thanking ourselves for money we save for that critical time, for the bottle of water we added at the right time earlier to save ourselves time, can help empower our future with better ability to use time
Updates that can optimize remaining years of life to less value?
Correct time management can mean spending 10 hours in a meeting or spending 10 hours doing something we love
10 Hours in a meeting about a topic you love, challenging, taxing, beats 10 hours in a meeting about a topic you hate
2 hour Concert awesome, 10 hour concert maybe a little less awesome
Time is valuable, Respecting it is not always a given
Working supply lines are valuable, Respecting them correctly are not always a given
Positive Challenges are Value In, Opportunity Positive Challenge Inspiring is not a given
PosChRVI-OPCI-NAGiven
People are good logic in is not always a given
Motives are understandable is not always a given
Now watch Time Management Again, Critical thinking change anything we pick up on?
For Me
Pre Critical Thinking
In Control of Our Time
Hell Yeah or No (Early Life Yes easier, Later in Life No can be more value in)
Treating others as you wish to be treated, Golden rule (Hell Yes leads to less regret)
Inspiring Less Regret for use of Time kind of what video is about
Writing Down Tasks can help for checking things off
Validation of Task Complete Value in, Creates Validation Dopamine In NFA-NFR
Success and Validation feeling of progress can encourage more progress
Also better use of time
Deadlines matter, artificial deadlines add leverage, leverage can lead to anxiety can lead to stress
NFA-NFR by perfectionists
Things we enjoy matters, protected time
Delegation matters, out sourcing responsibility and tasks can add a lot of value
Rewrite a word processing software or utilize notepad or word already built in? Value in not always fully appreciated
Critical Thinking
Some decisions have higher value than others
10% more water in my glass or not? 60% in glass Maybe not that big of deal
99% in glass, likely to spill, spills not always value in for less Non Null Time Costs
Clarifying Relevant from Irrelevant information can be High Value In
Knowing how much water is in the glass, helps us prioritize how important the remaining water
in the glass being added matters
Unintended consequences matter, A leads to B but what does B lead to
If B leads to C,D,E is that value in or value out?
Potential for combinations of high value in matter as well, A leads to B leads
to positives F,G,H,I
4 Positives beats 3 Negatives In By Accident Principle
Post Critical Thinking
We own all of our time -> Value in this statement? Time like water we pour it where we want
“Any time you are doing what you most want to be doing” – Fortune Cookie, eating the fortune cookie because sweet desert is nice
Wouldn’t be reading message if not, if you don’t want to be using your time in this way, can you change it? Oppressive systems exist, oppressive
systems don’t always have ability to truly control how we use our time, is it setting a good example to a corrupt system to allow them to control
our time?
Time is like water, others can divert its path like a stream, water sometimes takes path of least resistance
Hell Yes or No -> Potential to be hit by a bus potential to get cancer, time life is not guaranteed
Waste time doing something you really don’t love doing?
Daily Highlight -> One thing of high priority to get done each day, one thing that can make that day feel like a success
Organization is important and valuable, Hard to get right and takes time, to do lists without prioritization can make direction and
forward momentum harder, too many tasks to juggle leads to less effective juggler
To do lists matter, physical tactile -> no need for batteries, batteries that can fail, potential power savings for devices NFA-NFR
Have to use this for that not the best for creative problem solving
[Half way through]
Streaming Data is Valuable, how could streaming data vs holding updates into big updates add value to time management?
Throughput matters, combining information into bigger sections, more to read more to verify, not always as simple as we would like it to be
Too much time on productivity system can lead to problems
Not enough time on productivity system can lead to problems
Balance is required, all time spent on productivity system, productivity system is no value
No time spend on productivity system, life changing time saving updates and optimizations might be missed
Family time is easy to forget, adding value to Family and Social Networks is a Non Null Investment Cost
Parkinson’s Law -> give myself a day to get something done, will take a day, give myself a week to get something done will take a week, no artificial deadlines are not all value in
“Actionable Advice Leverage Artificial Deadlines” -> also reminder creates Risk for Anxiety, a risk worth mitigating “Do it badly” can be high value in for getting things done and less anxiety
Protected Time, Productivity Tasks, Constant Interrupts in Life can lead to things not getting done, things that we love and care about
Delegation Matters, systems that add value that are reliable can be high value in, also reminder that systems we rely upon can be taken away at non ideal times, forest fires, natural disasters, potential to not have access to things we rely on everyday, same thing for being stuck in a corrupt jail, not a problem in all places in the world does not always equal not a problem in our country in our life, NFA-NFR “we plan and God laughs”
Reliability matters to product lines, to continued use of product lines, a pen and paper that saves data correctly or loss of power causes problems, potential for flood, electronic might be higher value in
Context matters to usefulness of tool NFA-NFR
Better uses of tools such as short cuts like Ctrl-C and Ctrl-V can go a long way for decreasing Non Null Time Costs
Potential for tools like hot keys in life? Life hacks if you will?
Automate scheduling -> rely on reliable systems that provide value (as long as they are value in, visibility is limited NFA-NFR by many in society)
Dissatisfaction to More Not Always a Simple System, Efficiency is Never Perfected, the speed of technology and updates 5 years from now will be much greater
8 Billion people and giant super computers plus 5 years equals less efficient future use of time?
Basically I am saying unwise to beat ourselves up about not perfected optimizations that will be much outpaced by future updates, and a reminder why protected time is so much high value in
Diagnosed with Cancer a Month from Now, 6 months from now, 10 years from now? Do what you love and worrying about not perfectly optimized can lead to less optimized NFA
改进的批判性思维和决策研究数据，关于那个的组合？
Improved Critical Thinking and Decision Making Research Data, Combinatorics on that?
更好地鼓励光顾风险 降低风险 降低风险等于减少对焦虑的需求
Better Encouragement Potential for Patronizing Risk Mitigated Risk Mitigated equals less need for Anxiety
BEncP-PatRM-LRLN4A
Better Encouragement Potential Patronizing Risk Mitigated
Less Risk Less Need for Anxiety
More Risks mitigated less need to worry about the future
MRM-LN2W
Don’t worry -> God controls the weather, Life but a vapor
GCTW-LBAV-MRM-LN2W
Acts of Gods, Storms and Limited Resolution In By Design
Evil Also In By Design
The Sun keeps rising, and while we are alive heart keeps ticking
AoG-SLR-IBD-EIBD-TSKR-WWRA-HKT
AoG-SLR-IBD-EIBD-TSKR-WWRA-HKT-GCTW-LBAV-MRM-LN2W
Acts of God, Storms, Evil, and Limited Resolution is In By Design but the Sun Keeps rising and our hearts keep ticking, able to breathe able to see, risks that are being actively mitigated, seeing the battle is half the battle NFA-NFR
More Risks being Actively Mitigated equals Less Need to Worry
God In Control -> More Risks Being Actively Mitigated
GIC -> MRBAM
GIC -> Faith -> MRBAM -> Not Worrying is High Value In -> Perfectionism that leads to Worry is Not High Value In, Not High Value in to making updates that are High Value In
Potential for more Flexible Systems NFA-NFR
Creating Resilient Supply Lines possibly underappreciated up to June 2022, Potential for Future NFA-NFR
Water is a perfect system necessary for life and it will never be improved upon
Water with sugar or water with no sugar
Someone low on sugar might gain value added by water with sugar
Not all Brown water is good, Coffee and Tea are value in not always fully appreciated
Water in original pure form is useful in some cases, water with sugar or coffee and tea is useful in other cases
Updates add value don’t always add value NFA-NFR
Tea in a Bottle of Water? Could look like something is wrong with the water
Preconceived notions of whether or not a bottle of water is safe not always a simple system
Prone to judgement about molecules we can see, not ones that might be dissolved in the system
Values on this planet control by different systems than can likely be appreciated in other Universes on different planets
System is confusing and irrational at times on Shiny Blue Marble more complicated than people would likely to believe at times, Miracles, Angels, more Unknowns than we can imagine seems very possible and very not fully appreciate not fully respected
Easy to claim we should make decision D based on A+B+C when A+B are knowns and C is considered less relevant, easy to factor out God, Angels, and Other Unknowns F,G,H,I,J
D=A+B+C vs D=A+B+C+F+G+H+I+J
We have a tendency to understate importance of the amount of unknowns into the system to this being a point more worth reiterating possibly not fully appreciated
T = Can modify physics
U = Virtual systems can modify physics
V = Inputs can be iffed
T = Pulleys
U = Magnet under the table
V = Magnet visible to people on one side of the table
Physics can be modifiable in visible and non visible ways, physics of particles happen when dissolving in solution, easy to have faith they will dissolve even though we don’t see the interactions at a microscopic level
Believable dictates belief, believable does not always equal rational
Belief based on deduction, knowns that matter and knowns that do not
Potential to make relevance harder?
Is a document about relevance relevant or not relevant, process matters, thus I assert it is relevant to systems in the world
Systems that factor out relevance by design are less value in logic in by design
Easy to factor out a mans contributions harder to factor them in at times
Creating a document around Relevance potential to require all lawyers to add it to their decision making, they might not fully appreciate the required update
Maybe they just forgot to factor in relevant information, never happened before?
My Tech Blog 