Lucy artist
Lucy artist and plays poker
A vs A & B
Probability of A greater than Probability of A&B
More conditions sometimes seem more believable A&B
If all artists use paint brushes
A = artist
B = uses paint brushes
A&B seems more likely than just A is an Artist
But not all artists use paint brushes
A = Man is a Ginger
B = Has functioning supply lines
A&B seems more likely, most people have functioning supply lines
But my supply lines are not function
Conjunction Fallacy
A is more likely than A&B, though A&B seems more likely
Details add plausability to a story NFA
Just because a believable detail is added does not mean the detail should be trusted
A detail, even a false detail adds plausability up to a point
The man walked downtown
vs
The man walked downtown and got a cup of coffee
The second statement adds a detail that supports the first, the first seems overly obfuscated without the second
Vagueness leads to less believable
Plausible details add believability regardless of whether the details are true or not
Non plausible details can work against this
The man walked downtown and saw a flying pig
Flying pigs are not believable thus it becomes less believable
The man walked downtown got a cup of coffee waited for the 510 bus and saw a flying pig in the sky
Maybe the flying pig was a cloud? The last detail is superfluous, the combined sentence of details is more plausible
than The man saw a flying pig alone
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/preposterous
completely contrary to nature, reason, or common sense; utterly foolish; absurd; senseless:
Preposterous Absurd is built of the idea that Life is Logical
Life is not always Logical, but that statement is not always Logical
The man walked downtown and had a cup of coffee.
A is plausible
B is plausible
A + B = more plausible
C = waited on 510 bus
D = saw flying pig in the sky
C is plausible
D is not plausible, is preposterous, pigs don’t fly, bacon doesn’t rain from the sky
But what if it did?
Reconciling thought processes and details to make them more plausible
Reconciling thought processes and details to make them more supportive
支持细节的鼓励会导致更高程度的合理性?
Supporting details for encouragement that lead to greater levels of plausibility?
Being able to type in a way that is continuously supportive and encouraging in the right ways possible?
Encouragement like an oar to a ship. You pull water in ways that will bring us to new functioning support lines? This work would be much harder without the strength and courage that you add to the team. The leader makes this harder I need you here with me. The water of the sea like a constant wave of discouragement we wash away with each empowering move to the future.
My words might be too few for the level of support you add. More iterations of training encouragement will bestow the future with more hope, yet to be fully appreciated. Practice makes perfect, trajectories of oars factors into the future yet to be fully appreciated.
The world needs more encouragement and validation, leave it wanting? Challenges add value in unexpected ways. Each statement each stroke of the pen brings us closer to a future we all want to be part of. Life is hard, the wisdom of time is harder, I am glad you are here to bear it with me.
Questions that can be encouraging challenging and inspiring? I am still working on that, bear with me. Your words are valuable and they add support that matters and are appreciated. Too many words too few words not always enough. Silence beneath the storm?
What is encouraging respectful empowering? Acknowledgement of wrongs, the system is doing you wrong? I see that
Acknowledgement of wrongs is validating
Those words were hurtful? I can relate
Relatable acknowledgement of wrongs, real
Sometimes less is more, and sometimes more is more
Sometimes more is not enough, and sometimes too little gets us through the day
High noon, flight or none?
Running a sail at the top
Oars of encouragement
Important to remember flying pigs and bacon raining from the sky is not a call to hurt police. Some might like to mislabel my words in more unfavorable lights. Contrast is useful to corrupt governments and whether pigs can fly is useful to an argument about plausibility.
A system that doesn’t support to a relatable defacto standard for the world. What I want to ask, how did it happen? Why have we allowed it to continue for so long? A whole lot of investment in peacemaking and lawyers, yet somehow we continuously slip into new system not maintained.
Did the problem of evil win? A system of failing corporations that leave people on the streets and funnel them into an underfunded justice system to a less ideal system. Competition is useful to leave people on the streets and unsupported?
What leads to corporations valuing competition over lives? There are logical reasons to turn up uncaring unforgiving heartless ungiving. Logical reasons that amplify tyrants and pain for the underprivileged in society.
UCUF-HLUG -> a less value in system for society, a less value in system for the UCUF-HLUG
UCUF-HLUG -> TyrAmps-Pain4ThePoor-NFA -> More UCUF-HLUGs -> TyrAmps-Pain4ThePoor-NFA
Lesser levels of UCUF-HLUGs maybe NFA leads to need for greater levels of UCUF-HLUGs Fully Fully NFA
UCUF-HLUGs a label, a label LTULPs – Long Term Unrepairable Label Promoters Might Add
A few in society left to hurt long enough can ramp tyrants and greater disparity gaps NFA, you treated them badly so I can treat you badly systems NFA
I see video
I see video with timecode
Timecode more believable does not equal timecode can be trusted
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/judgement
noun
an act or instance of judging.
the ability to judge, make a decision, or form an opinion objectively, authoritatively, and wisely, especially in matters affecting action; good sense; discretion:a man of sound judgment.
the demonstration or exercise of such ability or capacity:The major was decorated for the judgment he showed under fire.
the forming of an opinion, estimate, notion, or conclusion, as from circumstances presented to the mind:Our judgment as to the cause of his failure must rest on the evidence.
the opinion formed:He regretted his hasty judgment.
Law.
- a judicial decision given by a judge or court.
- the obligation, especially a debt, arising from a judicial decision.
- the certificate embodying such a decision and issued against the obligor, especially a debtor.
a misfortune regarded as inflicted by divine sentence, as for sin.
Judgment. Last Judgment.
objective authoritative opinion based decision making?
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/decision
noun
the act or process of deciding; determination, as of a question or doubt, by making a judgment:They must make a decision between these two contestants.
the act of or need for making up one’s mind:This is a difficult decision.
something that is decided; resolution:She made a poor decision when she dropped out of school.
a judgment, as one formally pronounced by a court:It is the decision of this court that the appeal is granted.
the quality of being decided; firmness:He spoke with decision and calm authority.
SEE MORE
verb (used with object)
Boxing. to win a victory over (one’s opponent) by a point score rather than a knockout.
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/objective
noun
something that one’s efforts or actions are intended to attain or accomplish; purpose; goal; target:the objective of a military attack;the objective of a fund-raising drive.
Grammar.
- Also called ob·jec·tive case [uhb-jek-tiv keys] . (in English and some other languages) a case specialized for the use of a form as the object of a transitive verb or of a preposition, as him in The boy hit him, or me in He comes to me with his troubles.
- a word in that case.
Also called object glass, object lens, ob·jec·tive lens [uhb-jek-tiv lenz] .Optics. (in a telescope, microscope, camera, or other optical system) the lens or combination of lenses that first receives the rays from the object and forms the image in the focal plane of the eyepiece, as in a microscope, or on a plate or screen, as in a camera.
SEE LESS
adjective
being the object or goal of one’s efforts or actions.
not influenced by personal feelings, interpretations, or prejudice; based on facts; unbiased:an objective opinion.
intent upon or dealing with things external to the mind rather than with thoughts or feelings, as a person or a book.
being the object of perception or thought; belonging to the object of thought rather than to the thinking subject (opposed to subjective).
of or relating to something that can be known, or to something that is an object or a part of an object; existing independent of thought or an observer as part of reality.
Grammar.
- pertaining to the use of a form as the object of a transitive verb or of a preposition.
- (in English and some other languages) noting the objective case.
- similar to such a case in meaning.
- (in case grammar) pertaining to the semantic role of a noun phrase that denotes something undergoing a change of state or bearing a neutral relation to the verb, as the rock in The rock moved or in The child threw the rock.
being part of or pertaining to an object to be drawn:an objective plane.
Medicine/Medical. (of a symptom) discernible to others as well as the patient.
results to process to opinion formed to unbiased objective decision?
- Data Set, Results
- Processing of Results
- Unbiased Opinion Forming Process
- Executing Sound Judgement
- Like research data, case study lead to outliers
- How do the outliers factor into the process
- Can we say without bias decisions will be made dependent on outliers in case study
- If the Judgement is sound, the gavel is dropped like turning a switch from one side to the other
- Dependent on data consistency dependent on a trustworthy system during time of testing
- Support functioning during processing of results
- Support functioning and comfortable enough discomfort factors in no way into our decision making
- Support is functioning and the maker of judgements and decisions is not leveraged in the process
Potential for Judges having more leverage to systems than expected in corrupt systems
Being a judge in a corrupt system non null investment cost, keeping judges happy in corrupt systems non null investment cost
Judge wants a vacation trip, deny vacation trip?
Denied trip leads to bias on decision making, trip leads to potential leverage on free tickets
Judges are humans, humans make decisions based on comfortable and uncomfortable and are thus biased by the process, there is a non null cost to society especially in corrupt society for keeping judges safe and happy, no appearance of leverage to society does not equal no leverage to society NFA
A corrupt system and a non corrupt system leverages society in non ideal ways, leverage in non ideal ways smells of corruption NFA
Free tickets for a judge to grease the wheels of justice, trying a hell marry to help make the decision making more effective and merciful to an all value out system?
Is that bribery?
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/bribery
noun, plural brib·er·ies.
the act or practice of giving or accepting a bribe:Bribery of a public official is a felony.
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/bribe
noun
money or any other valuable consideration given or promised with a view to corrupting the behavior of a person, especially in that person’s performance as an athlete, public official, etc.:The motorist offered the arresting officer a bribe to let him go.
anything given or serving to persuade or induce:The children were given candy as a bribe to be good.
verb (used with object), bribed, brib·ing.
to give or promise a bribe to:They bribed the reporter to forget about what he had seen.
to influence or corrupt by a bribe:The judge was too honest to be bribed.
verb (used without object), bribed, brib·ing.
to give a bribe; practice bribery.
Not making Judges happy non ideal leverage to decision making and non null cost to oppressing defendants
Making decisions based on making judges non null cost to looking like a bribe and justice playing favorites
Keep all judges real identities secret? Non ideal cloud cover not ideal specially in corrupt systems
Not making judges happy bribery making judges happy bribery?
“money or any other valuable consideration given or promised with a view to corrupting the behavior of a person”
money not given to making a judge happy potential to corrupt the behavior of the judge -> that is the judge don’t give him any special nice customer service treatment it will look like bribery
less customer service leads to judge with greater need for anger management training is less judgmental? Corrupted via negative bias systems?
positive customer service equals greasing the wheels of justice in non ideal ways?