从 YouTube 或 Vlog 中的内容判断,谁支持内容,谁启发了内容,人们喜欢认为他们可以根据袋子里的内容来判断贡献或缺乏贡献,这并不是一件公平的事情
Judging by what is in YouTube or What is in the Vlog, Who supported the content, who inspired the content, People like to think they can judge contributions or lack of contributions based upon what is in the bag, not really a fair thing to do
为什么? 因为腐败的政府有时会阻止人们的内容和声音,而且除了 WordPress 和 YouTube 之外还有很多其他系统
Why? Because corrupt governments block content and voices from people at times, and there are a lot of other systems than WordPress and YouTube
如果幸运的话,YouTube 或许可以访问 0.5% 的世界内容? 并不意味着 YouTube 不具有高价值,仅根据人类知识进行判断并不能适当地展示 Shiny Blue Marble 的宏伟
YouTube maybe has access to 0.5 % of the worlds content if it was lucky? Doesn’t mean YouTube isn’t High Value In, just judging based only on human knowledge does not give proper scope to grandeur of Shiny Blue Marble
善意和鼓励的正确话语可以从积极的角度影响世界领导人,可以提前数年停止战争
Right words of kindness and encouragement could influence a world leader in a positive light, could stop a war years in advance
YouTube 可以成为世界和平的价值,不等于只有 YouTube 或 WordPress 就足以满足世界和平
YouTube can be value into World Peace, does not equal only YouTube or WordPress are adequate for World Peace alone
将我的供应线限制在 YouTube 和 WordPress 上,阻止我的供应品获得购买另一台电视的资金限制了我对 Spectrum 的访问,也许 Spectrum 对建立和平可能具有很高的价值
Limiting my supply lines to only YouTube and WordPress, blocking my supplies from access to funds to buy another TV limits my access to Spectrum, maybe Spectrum could be High Value In to Peacemaking
媒体巨头飞得很高,而德克萨斯州的 Gingers 窒息? 以任何方式限制我的供应线都没有价值
Media Giants fly high while Gingers in Texas suffocate? Limiting my supply lines is not value in whatever way you spin it
仍然没有 SSI | Still no SSI
And YouTube block keywords on search as a value in feature? wonder how some JavaScript proxies in front of Googles data center might do it? Would be wiser not to do that
Can’t trust network output from Googles data centers? Reliability considered a feature not worth counting on by Google? Leaves a non ideal feeling of not a good deal
Minimize leave resistance
想办法让腐败的领导人早日冬眠?
Find a way to get corrupt leaders to hibernate early?
不断断章取义的人不断断章取义?
People that continually take things out of context to continually taken out of context?
每个人都限制上下文的对话对任何人都没有价值
A conversation were everyone limits context is not value in for anyone
If you don’t like the clue, curve it?
直线运动不等于同方向运动
Moves in a straight line does not equal moves in same direction
人是直线运动还是光是直线运动?
The man moves in a straight line or light moves in a straight line?
硬上下文线索伊菲斯?Hard Context Clues Iffies?
混淆事物,例如优先级,优先级与 50 级?
Confuses things, like prioritization, Prioritization with 50 levels?
高优先级项目和低优先级项目比优先级 34 或 35 更容易理解,50 是主要对象任务,0 不值得做,我如何处理优先级 34 或 35?
High Priority Item and Low Priority items like easier to understand than Priority 34 or 35, 50 is Primary object task, 0 not worth doing, what do I do with Priority 34 or 35?
过度复杂化会影响快速做出决策的能力,无法快速做出决策会导致有效计划能力下降和执行计划能力下降
Excessive complication can confuse ability to make decisions swiftly, inability to make decisions quickly can lead to reduced ability to effectively plan and reduced ability to deliver on plans
可以增加所有决策的非空时间成本的系统可能是一个组合负支持系统未得到充分认识
Systems that can increase Non Null Time Costs for all Decision Making can be a Combinational Negative Support Out System Not Fully Appreciated
CNSOS-NFA
混合遗传学热门搜索结果 Hybrid Genetics Top Search Result
在不减少有效决策的情况下加快决策制定并不总是一个简单的系统
Speeding up Decision Making without Reducing Effective Decision Making Not Always a Simple System
SPUDM-woREDM-NAASS
时光荏苒,有些决定可能导致快速失败,有些决定可能导致长期失败
Time bends, some decisions can lead to fail fast, some decisions can lead to fail long
5秒后失败,结果,可以前进
Fails after 5 seconds, result and can move forward
5 天后失败,5 天的潜在损失时间
Fails after 5 days, 5 days of potential lost time
快速失败,结果以光速与声速发回?
Fails fast, results sent back at speed of light vs speed of sound?
光比声音快得多,相对于人类没有那么大的区别?
Light much faster than sound, relative to humans not that big of a difference?
唇形同步并不总是一个简单的系统
Lip syncing not always a simple system
给剪辑师 10 小时的镜头浏览时间,还是 1 小时的顶级镜头?
Give editors 10 hours of footage to look through, or 1 hour of top notch footage?
1 小时是一流的,还是可以在更短的时间内提供类似的灵感?
Is the 1 hour hour top notch, or could similar inspiration be delivered in less time?
Keyboard short cuts require Non Null Memory Cost traded for NNTC
NNMemC – Non Null Memory Cost
NNMC – Non Null Maintenance Cost
ESMA-GCW – Earth Shattering, Epically Mind Altering, Game Changing Wins
将未知数归咎于人们被认为是系统中的一种价值以及导致这种情况的原因
Blaming people for Unknowns Considered a Value In System and What Leads to That
BPFUnks-CVIS-&WL2T
将未知数归咎于人们被认为是系统中的一种价值以及导致这种情况的原因
Blaming people for Unknowns Considered a Value In System and What Leads to That
预期培训水平低于实际培训水平
Expected level of training is less than actual level of training
培训水平值得商榷 什么是好的培训值得商榷
Levels of training can be debatable what is good training can be debatable
限制生姜的供应线等于生姜仇恨者
Limiting Supply Lines for Ginger equals Ginger Hater