March 9th, 2022 Pt 2

Split and Woe won’t sink Shiny Blue Marble

Free Starter Image

Had some gems, maybe I can find some more

Jared Dunn equals too accommodating

Jared Dunn > Russ Hanneman, > Russ Hanneman does not equal Good Enough

“You do the math” – Russ Hanneman

Free Starter Image

Early Game Mike Ross (USA Suits), Jared Dunn(HBO Silicon Valley), and Russ Hanneman(HBO Silicon Valley) what do they have in common outside of this diagram?

All people with something to prove

Something to prove, Incentive for self proof, self reaffirmation through others

People that lack real validation?

“Does it go like this….. think about it” – Russ Hanneman(HBO Silicon Valley)

People that externalize need for validation useful? Promote that?

Likely equals less validation for all

Insecure and Hug less, so needy

Validation without needy for Validation from others

The work was sufficient, “next”

No want to pull a smile out, no want for return validation?

Likely leads to cold communication

Won’t validate, leads to less appreciation for wanting to bring smile out in some, still validating when the world won’t return validation

truly inspiring is different than half inspiring

Warm communication that is not needy

Does not insist upon itself

Love doesn’t demand its own way? Any cases where that might be problematic?

Not killing that inmate really would be better but love doesn’t demand its own way?

Depends on who is being loved?

Debate, arguing for something, persuasion without demand?

Gun to the head “Drop the gun” or “I really wish you would put the gun down”

Likely cases where both win, likely cases where both fail

Words can inspire actions, words do not fully dictate physics

Cause and effect barrier? Words to delivery?

If the inmate dies either way

“Drop the gun” or “I really wish you would put the gun down”

What looks better for Bad Ass Image?

Incentives to what words are used and why

Incentive for the lesson

We say we don’t inspire assholes

but

really

really

we do

Talks too much incentivize the negative

No issue in that?

Gives funding when I speak less, removed funding now that I am speaking more?

Limited oxygen in room argument?

Like paying people to sit quiet during Flint Michigan

Not how it was meant? Just conveniently turned off funding in October?

Sits silent on issue equals high ground, wise to affirm that in leaders?

Need to reduce ego, Need to humble leads to over reach, leads to under deliver?

Need to deliver punishment, loss, suffering, forfeiture for sake of humbling and abandonment of ego, possibly turned on gas and never turned gas off? Easy to forget, seeing as we don’t have an ego

Person delivering the ego reduction has the ego?

Person delivering punishment is one who actually needs to be punished?

Person making false accusations actually one who is guilty?

Victim of false accusation makes false accusation?

Without sin cast first stone

Forgiven of sin equals can cast stones freely?

Don’t think I agree with that

Systemic Stone Throwing Reduction Algorithm

Forgiveness In

IPV = Increasing Probability of Violence

IPV System = Unforgiveness in

Unforgiveness leads to miscommunication

Miscommunication leads to people picking up rocks and guns at wrong times for unjust reasons

Lot of Unforgiveness in being pushed by system, promote gun sells for self defense?

Self defense likely to be misrepresented?

On table vs off table solutions

Oppression in equals greater gun sales

Oppression in equals less communication

less communication + more guns = less probability for just solutions

Oppression is bad for the system, bad as can be

Odd combo, took the conversation in a direction I did not expect

Guns on the table, guns in the bar, when something doesn’t go right at the poker table

Or another system

No guns on the table, no guns in the bar, when something doesn’t go right at the poker table

might be wise to have two videos, showing the contrast

One reminds me of wild west, one reminds me of a Vegas show

A system full of people all interconnected, kind of like being at the poker table 100% of the time

1800s guy sitting in his shed

Some bullshit happens at the bar, might be a couple days before he hears word about it

News after dust has settled, or news immediately, of no consequence?

Free Starter Image

I agree stone throwing over adultery is messed up in this day and age

Too easy to orchestrate, sadly though doesn’t seem to fix the breach of trust

Breach of contract different than breach of trust?

Relationships just a legal document to you?

Incentivizing Adultery doesn’t lead to unforgiveness and judgement? Doesn’t increase IPV?

Some good in that

Breach of Trust is less than excuse for murder by imperfect sinful people?

Breach of Trust bad, breach of trust no excuse for murder

Breach of Trust bad, can lead to irrational actions

irrational actions with guns on the table or irrational action without guns on the table?

history before breach of trust or no history before breach of trust better?

not a marriage counselor, how much is that data worth? Likely huge

no history, person cheats, is found out -> result1

vs

history of breach of trust, person cheats, is found out -> result2

Not having the data equals a bit of AB testing

We judge how we punish criminals based on criminal records

Should we?

Oppressive system mislabels, then oppressive system gets to mislabel again?

OSM = Oppressive System Mislabels = Like a bully giving a special name

OSM, then OSGMA

if (OSM) then OSGMA

Issue here being the OS

An Operating System of Oppression non ideal for USA

OS = Operating System of Oppression = Oppressive System = Windows on the Devil 3.1?

Operating Systems and Oppressive Systems? OSOS? Similar names are valuable

sqrt(OSOS) still equals an Oppressive System?

Who would have thought

The logic is not flawless?

Increase voice of those promote support network, reduce voice of those that disagree with our flawless logic?

Limited oxygen argument and where support goes matters

Issue is disincentivizing a voice leads to that voice less valuable in dark times

“No path to redemption” equals boomerang of death

What is the “path of redemption”, righteousness, who defines what the path is to real growth matters

Better communication and a system that remains as an engine of oppression is not really a path of redemption I can get on board with

Results matter, support matters, not punishing people so far that voice is silenced or pushed to darker side matters

Feels a bit unwinnable at times

RM, SM, not pushing people to dark side matters

RM, SM, !lead DSM

Results, Support, not leading to Dark Side Matters

RSN2DSM

N2DS = Not lead to Dark Side

Corruption = Dark Side?

N2C

RSN2CM

Results and Support, any word for combining those two?

Delivery?

Delivering Not To Corruption Matters

Trajectory = Supported Moment and Target Result?

Trajectory Not To Corruption Matters

goal = TN2C = RSN2C = RSN2DS

Goal = Intent

Intent Matters

Specific vs General Intent?

Carrying away with coral reef? Grand Theft Big Fish?

Did you or did you not inspire more coral reefs, I remind you you are under oath

Free Starter Image
Free Starter Image

Specific intent to scream like a banshee for all the injustice I have experienced in my life?

Yes I intend to add that video to my vlog

Is useful support support that cannot be depended upon?

All support theoretically has a time table

paper found in a lost briefcase 500 years from now?

Support is useful support is temporary

temporary could be day to 10 years to 100 years to 200 years

Free Starter Image

Video Game guns cool, real life guns less cool

Published by techinfodebug

Flex and Java Developer, Christian, Art, Music, Video, and Vlogging

Leave a comment